The Myth of Men’s Stable, Continuous Labor Force Attachment: Multitrajectories of U.S. Baby Boomer Men’s Employment

IF 3 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Socius Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23780231231197031
Adrianne Frech, Jane Lankes, Sarah Damaske, Adrienne Ohler
{"title":"The Myth of Men’s Stable, Continuous Labor Force Attachment: Multitrajectories of U.S. Baby Boomer Men’s Employment","authors":"Adrianne Frech, Jane Lankes, Sarah Damaske, Adrienne Ohler","doi":"10.1177/23780231231197031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past several decades, U.S. men’s paid work has transformed from a state of high stability and continuity to a state of increased instability and precarity. Despite this, full-time employment throughout adulthood remains the presumed standard for modern American men. The authors investigated the diversity of men’s workforce experiences using the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth “National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 1979 cohort” and identified six multitrajectories of men’s time spent employed, unemployed, and out of the labor force from ages 27 to 49. The authors identified one multitrajectory of steady work, three of increasing unemployment or time out of work, one of increasing steady work, and one of intermittent work. Contrary to conventional assumptions, only 41 percent of men followed a trajectory of continuous, high employment over the duration of their prime earning years. This suggests that most men do not achieve the “ideal worker norm,” raising implications for how research and policy conceptualize men’s work experiences.","PeriodicalId":36345,"journal":{"name":"Socius","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socius","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231231197031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past several decades, U.S. men’s paid work has transformed from a state of high stability and continuity to a state of increased instability and precarity. Despite this, full-time employment throughout adulthood remains the presumed standard for modern American men. The authors investigated the diversity of men’s workforce experiences using the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth “National Longitudinal Survey of Youth - 1979 cohort” and identified six multitrajectories of men’s time spent employed, unemployed, and out of the labor force from ages 27 to 49. The authors identified one multitrajectory of steady work, three of increasing unemployment or time out of work, one of increasing steady work, and one of intermittent work. Contrary to conventional assumptions, only 41 percent of men followed a trajectory of continuous, high employment over the duration of their prime earning years. This suggests that most men do not achieve the “ideal worker norm,” raising implications for how research and policy conceptualize men’s work experiences.
男性稳定、持续的劳动力依附的神话:美国婴儿潮一代男性就业的多重轨迹
在过去的几十年里,美国男性的有偿工作已经从一种高度稳定和连续性的状态转变为一种越来越不稳定和不稳定的状态。尽管如此,整个成年期的全职工作仍然是现代美国男性的假定标准。作者利用全国青年纵向调查(1979年全国青年纵向调查)调查了男性劳动力经历的多样性,并确定了27至49岁男性就业、失业和退出劳动力时间的六条多轨迹。作者确定了一个稳定工作的多重轨迹,三个是失业或失业时间的增加,一个是稳定工作的增加,一个是间歇性工作。与传统的假设相反,只有41%的男性在他们的黄金收入年里保持了持续的高就业率。这表明,大多数男性没有达到“理想的工人标准”,这对研究和政策如何将男性的工作经历概念化提出了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Socius
Socius Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
84
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信