Personal Security Concepts of Law Students

T.M. Krasnyanskaya, V.G. Tylets
{"title":"Personal Security Concepts of Law Students","authors":"T.M. Krasnyanskaya, V.G. Tylets","doi":"10.17759/psylaw.2023130308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The work is aimed at identifying the structural, substantive and comparative features of personal security concepts of law students. The results of an empirical study conducted on a sample of students studying in a legal specialty are presented. The study (N=120) involved respondents aged 18 to 21 years (M=19.7&amp;plusmn;1.3), of which 81.7% were male. The main research method used is the method of free associations. The results were processed using the simplest mathematical statistics (finding averages, spread, percentage distribution) and a nonparametric method &amp;mdash; the Pearson criterion &amp;chi;2. The obtained results showed that law students have personal security concepts that are built according to a similar scheme, including, depending on the focus on danger/security, elements of \"wrong/right actions\", \"undesirable/desirable future\", \"negative/positive reality\", \"bad/good people\". These concepts are differentiated depending on their correlation with the household or professional sphere, differing in the dominance of objectivity/ subjectivity and internality / externality; they contain signs of professionalism and are associated with manifestations of the Self-concept of personality. The results of the study have explanatory potential for cases of security violations by lawyers in everyday life and in the profession.</p>","PeriodicalId":426732,"journal":{"name":"Psihologiâ i Pravo","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psihologiâ i Pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2023130308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The work is aimed at identifying the structural, substantive and comparative features of personal security concepts of law students. The results of an empirical study conducted on a sample of students studying in a legal specialty are presented. The study (N=120) involved respondents aged 18 to 21 years (M=19.7&plusmn;1.3), of which 81.7% were male. The main research method used is the method of free associations. The results were processed using the simplest mathematical statistics (finding averages, spread, percentage distribution) and a nonparametric method &mdash; the Pearson criterion &chi;2. The obtained results showed that law students have personal security concepts that are built according to a similar scheme, including, depending on the focus on danger/security, elements of "wrong/right actions", "undesirable/desirable future", "negative/positive reality", "bad/good people". These concepts are differentiated depending on their correlation with the household or professional sphere, differing in the dominance of objectivity/ subjectivity and internality / externality; they contain signs of professionalism and are associated with manifestations of the Self-concept of personality. The results of the study have explanatory potential for cases of security violations by lawyers in everyday life and in the profession.

法律专业学生的人身安全观
<p style="text-align: justify;">本研究旨在识别法律专业学生个人安全概念的结构特征、实质特征和比较特征。本文提出了一项对法律专业学生样本进行的实证研究结果。该研究(N=120)涉及18至21岁的受访者(M=19.7±1.3),其中81.7%为男性。使用的主要研究方法是自由联想法。使用最简单的数学统计(查找平均值、差值、百分比分布)和非参数方法处理结果。皮尔逊标准;结果显示,法律专业学生的个人安全概念是根据类似的方案建立的,根据对危险/安全的关注程度,包括“错误/正确的行为”、“不希望/理想的未来”、“消极/积极的现实”、“坏人/好人”等要素。这些概念根据其与家庭或专业领域的相关性而有所区别,在客观性/主观性和内部性/外部性的主导地位方面有所不同;它们包含专业精神的标志,并与人格自我概念的表现相关联。研究结果对律师在日常生活和职业中违反安全的案例具有解释潜力。</p>
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信