Adapting evidence-informed peri-discharge complex interventions in reducing 30-day hospital readmissions for heart failure and COPD

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Claire CW Zhong , Charlene HL Wong , Chi-tim Hung , Eng-kiong Yeoh , Eliza LY Wong , Vincent CH Chung
{"title":"Adapting evidence-informed peri-discharge complex interventions in reducing 30-day hospital readmissions for heart failure and COPD","authors":"Claire CW Zhong ,&nbsp;Charlene HL Wong ,&nbsp;Chi-tim Hung ,&nbsp;Eng-kiong Yeoh ,&nbsp;Eliza LY Wong ,&nbsp;Vincent CH Chung","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To select and refine evidence-informed peri-discharge complex interventions(abbrev. <em>Interventions</em><span>) for reducing 30-day hospital readmissions among Heart Failure(HF) and COPD patients in Hong Kong public healthcare system context using GRADE Evidence to Decision(EtD) framework.</span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Two 18-participant panels were recruited to carry out a two-step process for both conditions. In Step 1, participants were invited to prioritize <em>Interventions</em> and suggest important combinations of <em>Interventions</em>. In Step 2, based on the priority lists, participants were invited to conduct a two-round Delphi study for generating consensus-based <em>Interventions</em> for reducing 30-day hospital readmissions. GRADE EtD framework was used to guide the decision-making process, taking into consideration of benefits, harms, values and preferences, equity, acceptability, and feasibility.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Five out of ten <em>Interventions</em> reached positive consensus for HF, while six reached positive consensus for COPD. Case management, discharge planning, patient education, self-management, and telephone follow-up were common components, and were considered as core elements for reducing 30-day hospital readmissions among HF and COPD patients in Hong Kong. Preliminary implementation issues mainly included governance and leadership, financing, health workforce development, service access and readiness, as well as empowerment of patients and caregivers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study successfully applied the GRADE EtD framework for starting the adaptation process of complex interventions and established a list of local stakeholders-endorsed <em>Interventions</em> for reducing 30-day hospital readmissions for HF and COPD in Hong Kong. Before implementing and maintaining these endorsed <em>Interventions</em> at scale in local context, further research to improve intervention-context fit as well as piloting and evaluation is necessary.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883723000801","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To select and refine evidence-informed peri-discharge complex interventions(abbrev. Interventions) for reducing 30-day hospital readmissions among Heart Failure(HF) and COPD patients in Hong Kong public healthcare system context using GRADE Evidence to Decision(EtD) framework.

Methods

Two 18-participant panels were recruited to carry out a two-step process for both conditions. In Step 1, participants were invited to prioritize Interventions and suggest important combinations of Interventions. In Step 2, based on the priority lists, participants were invited to conduct a two-round Delphi study for generating consensus-based Interventions for reducing 30-day hospital readmissions. GRADE EtD framework was used to guide the decision-making process, taking into consideration of benefits, harms, values and preferences, equity, acceptability, and feasibility.

Results

Five out of ten Interventions reached positive consensus for HF, while six reached positive consensus for COPD. Case management, discharge planning, patient education, self-management, and telephone follow-up were common components, and were considered as core elements for reducing 30-day hospital readmissions among HF and COPD patients in Hong Kong. Preliminary implementation issues mainly included governance and leadership, financing, health workforce development, service access and readiness, as well as empowerment of patients and caregivers.

Conclusions

This study successfully applied the GRADE EtD framework for starting the adaptation process of complex interventions and established a list of local stakeholders-endorsed Interventions for reducing 30-day hospital readmissions for HF and COPD in Hong Kong. Before implementing and maintaining these endorsed Interventions at scale in local context, further research to improve intervention-context fit as well as piloting and evaluation is necessary.

采用循证出院期复杂干预措施,减少心力衰竭和慢性阻塞性肺病患者30天再入院率
选择和完善循证出院期复杂干预措施(简称。干预措施)在香港公共医疗系统背景下使用GRADE证据到决策(EtD)框架减少心力衰竭(HF)和慢性阻塞性肺病患者30天再入院率。招募了两个18名参与者的小组,对这两种情况进行两步处理。在步骤1中,参与者被邀请对干预措施进行优先排序,并建议重要的干预措施组合。在步骤2中,根据优先级列表,邀请参与者进行两轮德尔菲研究,以产生基于共识的干预措施,以减少30天的再入院率。使用GRADE EtD框架来指导决策过程,考虑到利益、危害、价值和偏好、公平性、可接受性和可行性。10项干预措施中有5项对心力衰竭达成积极共识,而6项对慢性阻塞性肺病达成积极共识。病例管理、出院计划、患者教育、自我管理和电话随访是常见的组成部分,被认为是减少香港HF和COPD患者30天再入院的核心要素。初步实施问题主要包括治理和领导、筹资、卫生人力发展、服务获取和准备,以及增强患者和护理人员的权能。本研究成功应用GRADE EtD框架启动复杂干预措施的适应过程,并建立了一份由本地利益相关者认可的干预措施清单,以减少香港心力衰竭和慢性阻塞性肺病患者30天的再入院率。在当地大规模实施和维持这些认可的干预措施之前,有必要进一步研究以改善干预措施与环境的契合度,并进行试点和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Policy and Technology
Health Policy and Technology Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments. HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology. Topics covered by HPT will include: - Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems - Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches - National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives - Cross-border eHealth including health tourism - The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare - Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies - Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies - Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making - Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in) - Regulation and health economics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信