Safety and efficacy of complementary medicines for eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders in adults: a systematic review and exploration of candidate interventions.

IF 1.7 Q2 Medicine
Nicole Hannan, Janet Schloss, Matthew J Leach
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of complementary medicines for eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders in adults: a systematic review and exploration of candidate interventions.","authors":"Nicole Hannan, Janet Schloss, Matthew J Leach","doi":"10.1016/j.aimed.2023.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) are a group of Th2-mediated antigen-driven conditions. The limitations of conventional management options (i.e. invasive monitoring, adverse effects of pharmacological treatments and challenges with maintaining dietary restrictions) may lead people with EGIDs to seek other treatment options, such as complementary medicine (CM). Although there is mounting evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of some complementary medicines (CMs) for the management of gastrointestinal diseases, the evidence of effectiveness of CMs for EGIDs has not yet been systematically reviewed. A systematic review of controlled clinical trials and randomised controlled trials, including cross-over trials, examining the safety and / or efficacy of any CM, against any comparator, was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of CMs in adults with EGIDs and to explore potential candidate interventions. The search identified 4,304 references. After title and abstract screening, 4,297 studies were excluded. The 7 identified studies were retrieved as full-text and assessed for eligibility. All 7 studies were excluded due to wrong study design (n = 1; retrospective study), and wrong patient population (n = 6; e.g. patients with functional dyspepsia or heartburn). No studies met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in this review. While there is a paucity of clinical studies examining the effectiveness of CM for EGID, findings from observational and experimental studies highlight possible directions for future research. These studies point to a number of CMs (i.e. nutritional supplements and herbal medicines) that show promise as a treatment for EGID; the clinical safety and efficacy of these interventions therefore warrants further investigation. Identifying safe, effective and acceptable treatment options for people living with an EGID may help to reduce disease and treatment burden in this population, and in turn, improve quality of life.","PeriodicalId":7343,"journal":{"name":"Advances in integrative medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in integrative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aimed.2023.09.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) are a group of Th2-mediated antigen-driven conditions. The limitations of conventional management options (i.e. invasive monitoring, adverse effects of pharmacological treatments and challenges with maintaining dietary restrictions) may lead people with EGIDs to seek other treatment options, such as complementary medicine (CM). Although there is mounting evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of some complementary medicines (CMs) for the management of gastrointestinal diseases, the evidence of effectiveness of CMs for EGIDs has not yet been systematically reviewed. A systematic review of controlled clinical trials and randomised controlled trials, including cross-over trials, examining the safety and / or efficacy of any CM, against any comparator, was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of CMs in adults with EGIDs and to explore potential candidate interventions. The search identified 4,304 references. After title and abstract screening, 4,297 studies were excluded. The 7 identified studies were retrieved as full-text and assessed for eligibility. All 7 studies were excluded due to wrong study design (n = 1; retrospective study), and wrong patient population (n = 6; e.g. patients with functional dyspepsia or heartburn). No studies met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in this review. While there is a paucity of clinical studies examining the effectiveness of CM for EGID, findings from observational and experimental studies highlight possible directions for future research. These studies point to a number of CMs (i.e. nutritional supplements and herbal medicines) that show promise as a treatment for EGID; the clinical safety and efficacy of these interventions therefore warrants further investigation. Identifying safe, effective and acceptable treatment options for people living with an EGID may help to reduce disease and treatment burden in this population, and in turn, improve quality of life.
补充药物治疗成人嗜酸性胃肠道疾病的安全性和有效性:候选干预措施的系统回顾和探索。
嗜酸性胃肠道疾病(EGIDs)是一组由th2介导的抗原驱动的疾病。传统治疗方案的局限性(即侵入性监测、药物治疗的不良影响和维持饮食限制的挑战)可能导致egid患者寻求其他治疗方案,如补充药物(CM)。虽然有越来越多的证据支持一些补充药物(CMs)用于胃肠道疾病管理的安全性和有效性,但CMs对EGIDs有效性的证据尚未得到系统的审查。对对照临床试验和随机对照试验(包括交叉试验)进行系统回顾,检查任何CM与任何比较物的安全性和/或有效性,以确定成年EGIDs患者CM的安全性和有效性,并探索潜在的候选干预措施。搜索确定了4304个参考文献。经过标题和摘要筛选,4297项研究被排除在外。7项被确定的研究被检索为全文并评估其合格性。7项研究均因错误的研究设计而被排除(n = 1;回顾性研究)和错误的患者群体(n = 6;如功能性消化不良或胃灼热患者)。没有研究符合纳入本综述的资格标准。虽然缺乏临床研究检查CM对EGID的有效性,但观察和实验研究的结果突出了未来研究的可能方向。这些研究指出,一些营养补充剂(即营养补充剂和草药)有望成为治疗EGID的方法;因此,这些干预措施的临床安全性和有效性值得进一步研究。为EGID患者确定安全、有效和可接受的治疗方案,可能有助于减轻这一人群的疾病和治疗负担,进而改善生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in integrative medicine
Advances in integrative medicine INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Integrative Medicine (AIMED) is an international peer-reviewed, evidence-based research and review journal that is multi-disciplinary within the fields of Integrative and Complementary Medicine. The journal focuses on rigorous quantitative and qualitative research including systematic reviews, clinical trials and surveys, whilst also welcoming medical hypotheses and clinically-relevant articles and case studies disclosing practical learning tools for the consulting practitioner. By promoting research and practice excellence in the field, and cross collaboration between relevant practitioner groups and associations, the journal aims to advance the practice of IM, identify areas for future research, and improve patient health outcomes. International networking is encouraged through clinical innovation, the establishment of best practice and by providing opportunities for cooperation between organisations and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信