What Makes Collegiate Sport Club Programs Successful? Exploration of How Success Is Measured and Perceived

IF 0.7 Q4 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
Leeann M. Lower-Hoppe, Ali Talcott, Alina Cioletti, Daniel Springer, W. Andrew Czekanski, Richard J. Buning
{"title":"What Makes Collegiate Sport Club Programs Successful? Exploration of How Success Is Measured and Perceived","authors":"Leeann M. Lower-Hoppe, Ali Talcott, Alina Cioletti, Daniel Springer, W. Andrew Czekanski, Richard J. Buning","doi":"10.1177/15588661231203969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collegiate sport club programs are increasingly expected to demonstrate effectiveness and impact, as such the evaluation of program success is critical. Current evaluation methods are often subjective and lack standardization across programs. Unlike other recreational programs, sport clubs have unique organizational structures, with student officers responsible for various tasks related to club operations with unclear measurable outcomes. This study aimed to address this gap by investigating how collegiate recreation departments evaluate sport club program success and identifying critical success indicators. A Delphi design was used to gather expert opinions, and qualitative and quantitative data analysis was employed. The findings highlight various evaluation methods employed by administrators, including annual assessments, participant interviews, and point systems. Furthermore, indicators of success encompassed club activities, operations, and status, as well as participants’ experiences and development. These findings provide valuable insights for program administrators to tailor support and enhance the effectiveness of collegiate sport club programs.","PeriodicalId":55615,"journal":{"name":"Recreational Sports Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recreational Sports Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15588661231203969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Collegiate sport club programs are increasingly expected to demonstrate effectiveness and impact, as such the evaluation of program success is critical. Current evaluation methods are often subjective and lack standardization across programs. Unlike other recreational programs, sport clubs have unique organizational structures, with student officers responsible for various tasks related to club operations with unclear measurable outcomes. This study aimed to address this gap by investigating how collegiate recreation departments evaluate sport club program success and identifying critical success indicators. A Delphi design was used to gather expert opinions, and qualitative and quantitative data analysis was employed. The findings highlight various evaluation methods employed by administrators, including annual assessments, participant interviews, and point systems. Furthermore, indicators of success encompassed club activities, operations, and status, as well as participants’ experiences and development. These findings provide valuable insights for program administrators to tailor support and enhance the effectiveness of collegiate sport club programs.
是什么让大学体育俱乐部项目成功?探索如何衡量和感知成功
越来越多的人期望大学体育俱乐部项目显示出有效性和影响力,因此对项目成功的评估是至关重要的。目前的评估方法往往是主观的,缺乏跨项目的标准化。与其他娱乐项目不同,体育俱乐部有独特的组织结构,学生官员负责与俱乐部运营相关的各种任务,但结果不明确。本研究旨在通过调查大学娱乐部门如何评估体育俱乐部项目的成功,并确定关键的成功指标来解决这一差距。采用德尔菲法收集专家意见,采用定性和定量数据分析。研究结果强调了管理人员采用的各种评估方法,包括年度评估、参与者访谈和计分系统。此外,成功的指标包括扶轮社的活动、运作和地位,以及参与者的经验和发展。这些发现为项目管理者提供了有价值的见解,以定制支持和提高大学体育俱乐部项目的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Recreational Sports Journal
Recreational Sports Journal HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
64.30%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信