Correlation of Atherogenic Index of Plasma and Atherogenic Coefficient with Cardiovascular Disease Risk assessed by ASCVD Risk Calculator

Rahal Widanagamage, None K.H.M. Silva, None H.A.C. Ayeshmantha, None K.U.G.D.M. Kariyawasam, None R.A.N.K. Wijesinghe
{"title":"Correlation of Atherogenic Index of Plasma and Atherogenic Coefficient with Cardiovascular Disease Risk assessed by ASCVD Risk Calculator","authors":"Rahal Widanagamage, None K.H.M. Silva, None H.A.C. Ayeshmantha, None K.U.G.D.M. Kariyawasam, None R.A.N.K. Wijesinghe","doi":"10.31357/jhsir.v4i01.6329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of approximately one-third deaths worldwide. Absolute lipid parameters are inadequate in predicting CVD risk and several lipid indices have been introduced namely “Atherogenic index of plasma” (AIP) and “Atherogenic coefficient” (AC). CVD risk of a patient for the upcoming 10 years can be calculated using atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk calculator. Though, this method currently accepts as the gold standard, certain drawbacks have been reported. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the correlation of AIP and AC with CVD risk estimation for the upcoming 10 years calculated by ASCVD risk calculator. Methods: Hundred and fifty-three patients were recruited for the study. Socio-demographic data were collected through interviewer-based questionnaire. Total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides values were obtained from the lipid profile test results of the study participants. AIP and AC were calculated using formulas while 10-year ASCVD risk was calculated by ASCVD risk calculator. Results: There was no significant correlation between AIP and 10-year ASCVD risk (p>0.05) and AC and 10-year ASCVD risk (p>0.05), but a significant correlation was observed between AIP and AC (Pearson’s correlation r=0.425, p<0.05). Conclusions: CVD risk of patients should be assessed routinely especially as it is overlooked in most patients presenting normal lipid profile variables, hence the actual risk remains silent unless it is properly investigated using laboratory investigations","PeriodicalId":493801,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health sciences and innovative research","volume":"184 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health sciences and innovative research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31357/jhsir.v4i01.6329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of approximately one-third deaths worldwide. Absolute lipid parameters are inadequate in predicting CVD risk and several lipid indices have been introduced namely “Atherogenic index of plasma” (AIP) and “Atherogenic coefficient” (AC). CVD risk of a patient for the upcoming 10 years can be calculated using atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk calculator. Though, this method currently accepts as the gold standard, certain drawbacks have been reported. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the correlation of AIP and AC with CVD risk estimation for the upcoming 10 years calculated by ASCVD risk calculator. Methods: Hundred and fifty-three patients were recruited for the study. Socio-demographic data were collected through interviewer-based questionnaire. Total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides values were obtained from the lipid profile test results of the study participants. AIP and AC were calculated using formulas while 10-year ASCVD risk was calculated by ASCVD risk calculator. Results: There was no significant correlation between AIP and 10-year ASCVD risk (p>0.05) and AC and 10-year ASCVD risk (p>0.05), but a significant correlation was observed between AIP and AC (Pearson’s correlation r=0.425, p<0.05). Conclusions: CVD risk of patients should be assessed routinely especially as it is overlooked in most patients presenting normal lipid profile variables, hence the actual risk remains silent unless it is properly investigated using laboratory investigations
用ASCVD风险计算器评估血浆动脉粥样硬化指数和动脉粥样硬化系数与心血管疾病风险的相关性
导读:心血管疾病(CVD)是全球约三分之一死亡的主要原因。绝对脂质参数不足以预测心血管疾病的风险,因此引入了“血浆动脉粥样硬化指数”(AIP)和“动脉粥样硬化系数”(AC)等脂质指标。使用动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险计算器可以计算患者未来10年的CVD风险。虽然这种方法目前被认为是金标准,但也有一些缺点。因此,本研究的目的是研究AIP和AC与ASCVD风险计算器计算的未来10年CVD风险估计的相关性。方法:共纳入153例患者。通过访谈问卷收集社会人口统计数据。总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和甘油三酯值从研究参与者的血脂测试结果中获得。AIP和AC采用公式计算,10年ASCVD风险采用ASCVD风险计算器计算。结果:AIP与10年ASCVD风险(p>0.05)、AC与10年ASCVD风险(p>0.05)无显著相关性,但AIP与AC有显著相关性(Pearson相关r=0.425, p<0.05)。结论:患者的心血管疾病风险应进行常规评估,尤其是在大多数血脂变量正常的患者中被忽视,因此实际风险保持沉默,除非通过实验室调查进行适当的调查
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信