Privileged Omissions: The Impact of Discriminatory Inaction

IF 3.2 3区 管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Addrain Conyers, Tony Carrizales
{"title":"Privileged Omissions: The Impact of Discriminatory Inaction","authors":"Addrain Conyers, Tony Carrizales","doi":"10.1177/00953997231204980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars commonly study bias and discrimination from the perspective of those discriminated against and, to some extent, the institutional practices that foster discrimination. Within the research of institutional oppression, there is a concurrent area of discriminatory omissions that is often excluded from such studies. Research on privileged omissions as a discretionary bias provides a more holistic view of discretionary decision-making. The concept of discriminatory omissions has limited research, but this paper adds to scholarship in this critical area by providing analysis and calls upon public service practices to disrupt the unintended consequences of privileged omissions.","PeriodicalId":47966,"journal":{"name":"Administration & Society","volume":"28 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997231204980","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scholars commonly study bias and discrimination from the perspective of those discriminated against and, to some extent, the institutional practices that foster discrimination. Within the research of institutional oppression, there is a concurrent area of discriminatory omissions that is often excluded from such studies. Research on privileged omissions as a discretionary bias provides a more holistic view of discretionary decision-making. The concept of discriminatory omissions has limited research, but this paper adds to scholarship in this critical area by providing analysis and calls upon public service practices to disrupt the unintended consequences of privileged omissions.
特权遗漏:歧视性不作为的影响
学者们通常从被歧视者的角度来研究偏见和歧视,在某种程度上,也从助长歧视的制度实践的角度来研究偏见和歧视。在对制度压迫的研究中,有一个同时存在的歧视性遗漏领域,通常被排除在此类研究之外。将特权遗漏作为一种自由裁量性偏见的研究,为自由裁量性决策提供了更全面的视角。歧视性省略的概念研究有限,但本文通过提供分析和呼吁公共服务实践来破坏特权省略的意外后果,增加了这一关键领域的学术研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Administration & Society
Administration & Society PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Administration & Society seeks to further the understanding of public and human service organizations, their administrative processes, and their effect on society. The journal publishes empirically oriented research reports and theoretically specific articles that synthesize or contribute to the advancement of understanding and explanation in these fields. Of particular interest are (1) studies that analyze the effects of the introduction of administrative strategies, programs, change interventions, and training; and (2) studies of intergroup, interorganizational, and organization-environment relationships and policy processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信