Autistic Communication: A Survey of School-Based Professionals

Amy L. Donaldson, Alyssa Hillary Zisk, Brandon Eddy, endever* corbin, Melissa Ugianskis, Erin Ford, Olivia Strickland
{"title":"Autistic Communication: A Survey of School-Based Professionals","authors":"Amy L. Donaldson, Alyssa Hillary Zisk, Brandon Eddy, endever* corbin, Melissa Ugianskis, Erin Ford, Olivia Strickland","doi":"10.1044/2023_persp-23-00107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Access to communication is a basic human right, yet autistic adults have reported challenges fully and effectively expressing themselves throughout childhood. This may be due to the historical (and ongoing) focus and prioritization of speech skills as a barometer of communicative success. The result is a lack of support for other forms of communication for children who may speak but still require support to fully meet their communication needs. This study aimed to examine the knowledge, experience, and training of school-based professionals in order to better understand one possible barrier to early communication access for autistic children. Method: Using a participatory research method, we designed and administered a 35-question online survey. A total of 567 participants completed the survey, including 465 special educators, 71 speech-language pathologists (SLPs), and 31 other professionals. A segment of the survey data was analyzed in R. Comparisons between and within the largest groups (SLPs and special educators) were made with nonparametric statistics, including Fisher's exact, Wilcoxon signed-ranks, and Quade tests. Results: SLPs and special educators differed significantly on a variety of survey measures, including undergraduate coursework in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and autism, caseloads, and confidence related to working with autistic students and AAC users. Regardless of profession, most respondents reported completing what they considered to be an AAC assessment. Conclusions: Increasing school-based professionals' knowledge related to autism and AAC, as well as opportunities to improve skills, is critical to resolving access and opportunity barriers for autistic children who speak but may benefit from AAC. Partnering with autistic people to better understand autistic speech and careful collaboration among team members are recommended. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24299422","PeriodicalId":74424,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups","volume":"60 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_persp-23-00107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Access to communication is a basic human right, yet autistic adults have reported challenges fully and effectively expressing themselves throughout childhood. This may be due to the historical (and ongoing) focus and prioritization of speech skills as a barometer of communicative success. The result is a lack of support for other forms of communication for children who may speak but still require support to fully meet their communication needs. This study aimed to examine the knowledge, experience, and training of school-based professionals in order to better understand one possible barrier to early communication access for autistic children. Method: Using a participatory research method, we designed and administered a 35-question online survey. A total of 567 participants completed the survey, including 465 special educators, 71 speech-language pathologists (SLPs), and 31 other professionals. A segment of the survey data was analyzed in R. Comparisons between and within the largest groups (SLPs and special educators) were made with nonparametric statistics, including Fisher's exact, Wilcoxon signed-ranks, and Quade tests. Results: SLPs and special educators differed significantly on a variety of survey measures, including undergraduate coursework in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and autism, caseloads, and confidence related to working with autistic students and AAC users. Regardless of profession, most respondents reported completing what they considered to be an AAC assessment. Conclusions: Increasing school-based professionals' knowledge related to autism and AAC, as well as opportunities to improve skills, is critical to resolving access and opportunity barriers for autistic children who speak but may benefit from AAC. Partnering with autistic people to better understand autistic speech and careful collaboration among team members are recommended. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24299422
自闭症沟通:校本专业人员调查
目的:获得沟通是一项基本人权,然而自闭症成年人在整个童年时期都面临着充分有效地表达自己的挑战。这可能是由于历史上(和现在)对演讲技巧的关注和优先级作为沟通成功的晴雨表。其结果是,对于可能会说话但仍需要支持以充分满足其沟通需求的儿童,缺乏对其他形式沟通的支持。本研究旨在考察学校专业人员的知识、经验和培训,以便更好地了解自闭症儿童早期沟通的一个可能障碍。方法:采用参与式研究方法,设计并实施了一份包含35个问题的在线调查。共有567名参与者完成了调查,其中包括465名特殊教育者,71名语言病理学家(slp)和31名其他专业人士。部分调查数据在r中进行了分析。使用非参数统计,包括Fisher精确检验、Wilcoxon符号秩和Quade检验,对最大群体(特殊教育工作者和特殊教育工作者)之间和内部进行了比较。结果:特殊教育工作者和特殊教育工作者在各种调查措施上存在显著差异,包括增强和替代沟通(AAC)和自闭症的本科课程,案例量,以及与自闭症学生和AAC使用者工作相关的信心。无论职业如何,大多数受访者都完成了他们认为是AAC评估的内容。结论:增加学校专业人员与自闭症和AAC相关的知识,以及提高技能的机会,对于解决自闭症儿童的接触和机会障碍至关重要,这些儿童会说话,但可能从AAC中受益。建议与自闭症患者合作,以更好地理解自闭症患者的语言,并在团队成员之间进行仔细的合作。补充资料:https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24299422
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信