Auditing Gig Work Platforms: Fairwork’s Research, Advocacy, and Impact

Jack Linchuan Qiu, Renyi Hong, Adam Badger
{"title":"Auditing Gig Work Platforms: Fairwork’s Research, Advocacy, and Impact","authors":"Jack Linchuan Qiu, Renyi Hong, Adam Badger","doi":"10.1142/s281103152300013x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of the “gig economy” poses fundamental challenges to pre-existing social compacts regarding labour relations around the world, with vital implications for Singapore’s workforce, economic growth, and its tripartism framework. While some see an inevitable trend towards digital technologies and artificial intelligence (AI)-powered platforms dominating workers, others seek to find solutions through state intervention and/or corporate self-management. Both latter approaches, we contend, would be incomplete without hearing the voices of gig workers and considering their experiences in light of relevant platform policies and government regulations. Can gig work platforms be subjected to labour audits? If so, how? This paper introduces the Fairwork project as a case in which labour audits are conducted to assess ride-hailing and food delivery platforms across five continents in 30 countries including Singapore. We aim to discuss the project’s background and its five main principles, its methods of research and advocacy, the promises of auditing gig work platforms, its social and policy impact, and its limitations. We also present findings from focus groups and interviews involving ride-hailing drivers and food delivery riders in Singapore, which were conducted in 2021–2022 using the Fairwork methodology. In so doing, we discuss the lessons learnt from the case of Fairwork and similar projects of labour-auditing gig work platforms, which deserve more attention and exploration in Singapore and elsewhere.","PeriodicalId":488738,"journal":{"name":"Singapore Labour Journal","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore Labour Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s281103152300013x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rise of the “gig economy” poses fundamental challenges to pre-existing social compacts regarding labour relations around the world, with vital implications for Singapore’s workforce, economic growth, and its tripartism framework. While some see an inevitable trend towards digital technologies and artificial intelligence (AI)-powered platforms dominating workers, others seek to find solutions through state intervention and/or corporate self-management. Both latter approaches, we contend, would be incomplete without hearing the voices of gig workers and considering their experiences in light of relevant platform policies and government regulations. Can gig work platforms be subjected to labour audits? If so, how? This paper introduces the Fairwork project as a case in which labour audits are conducted to assess ride-hailing and food delivery platforms across five continents in 30 countries including Singapore. We aim to discuss the project’s background and its five main principles, its methods of research and advocacy, the promises of auditing gig work platforms, its social and policy impact, and its limitations. We also present findings from focus groups and interviews involving ride-hailing drivers and food delivery riders in Singapore, which were conducted in 2021–2022 using the Fairwork methodology. In so doing, we discuss the lessons learnt from the case of Fairwork and similar projects of labour-auditing gig work platforms, which deserve more attention and exploration in Singapore and elsewhere.
审计零工平台:Fairwork的研究、倡导和影响
“零工经济”的兴起对世界各地已有的劳资关系社会契约构成了根本性挑战,对新加坡的劳动力、经济增长及其三方框架产生了重要影响。虽然一些人认为数字技术和人工智能(AI)驱动的平台主宰工人是一种不可避免的趋势,但其他人则寻求通过国家干预和/或企业自我管理来寻找解决方案。我们认为,如果不听取零工工人的声音,并根据相关的平台政策和政府法规考虑他们的经历,后两种方法都是不完整的。零工平台可以接受劳工审计吗?如果有,怎么做?本文介绍了Fairwork项目作为一个案例,其中进行了劳工审计,以评估包括新加坡在内的五大洲30个国家的叫车和送餐平台。我们的目标是讨论该项目的背景及其五个主要原则、研究和倡导方法、审计零工工作平台的承诺、其社会和政策影响以及其局限性。我们还介绍了2021-2022年使用Fairwork方法进行的针对新加坡网约车司机和送餐员的焦点小组和访谈的结果。在此过程中,我们讨论了Fairwork案例和类似的劳动审计零工平台项目的经验教训,这在新加坡和其他地方值得更多的关注和探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信