Major-based undergraduate curriculum as an obstacle to graduate employability development

Huan Li, Fei Cao, Weiwei Dai
{"title":"Major-based undergraduate curriculum as an obstacle to graduate employability development","authors":"Huan Li, Fei Cao, Weiwei Dai","doi":"10.1080/07294360.2023.2258844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTTo tackle the problem of graduate employability (GE), higher education researchers and practitioners are suggesting the inclusion of employability modules in university curricula. However, the orthodoxy of the major-based undergraduate curriculum (MBUC) has rarely been challenged in the GE literature. Drawing on Clarke’s (2018) [Clarke, M. (2018). Rethinking graduate employability: The role of capital, individual attributes and context. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 1923–1937. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1294152] integrated employability model, this paper explores how MBUC affects undergraduate students’ GE development. The data were 27 interviews with undergraduates majoring in Portuguese at six Chinese universities. Findings show that the MBUC weakens students’ perceived employability by cultivating a single rather than compound skill set, limiting their social circles and, therefore, horizons for action and delaying their career self-management. More directly, it affects GE in some cases by overproducing a homogeneously skilled workforce. We argue that in many fields of the current world of work, the MBUC may have contradicted its original, and once achieved, goal of enhancing GE for a particular profession; rather, in practice, it has become an obstacle to GE development.KEYWORDS: Undergraduate curriculumcollege majorgraduate employabilityhuman capitalgraduate attribute AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to sincerely thank the participants for their generous support and express their gratitude to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable insights and feedback.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Chinese universities are primarily categorised according to their strongest academic disciplines, with many institutions possessing expertise and robust research programmes in particular industries.2 In recent years, some Chinese short-form video hosting services have become popular overseas, including in Portuguese-speaking countries. They need employees who speak these languages to review videos, provide overseas customer service, and market development.","PeriodicalId":73238,"journal":{"name":"Higher education research and development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher education research and development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2258844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTTo tackle the problem of graduate employability (GE), higher education researchers and practitioners are suggesting the inclusion of employability modules in university curricula. However, the orthodoxy of the major-based undergraduate curriculum (MBUC) has rarely been challenged in the GE literature. Drawing on Clarke’s (2018) [Clarke, M. (2018). Rethinking graduate employability: The role of capital, individual attributes and context. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 1923–1937. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1294152] integrated employability model, this paper explores how MBUC affects undergraduate students’ GE development. The data were 27 interviews with undergraduates majoring in Portuguese at six Chinese universities. Findings show that the MBUC weakens students’ perceived employability by cultivating a single rather than compound skill set, limiting their social circles and, therefore, horizons for action and delaying their career self-management. More directly, it affects GE in some cases by overproducing a homogeneously skilled workforce. We argue that in many fields of the current world of work, the MBUC may have contradicted its original, and once achieved, goal of enhancing GE for a particular profession; rather, in practice, it has become an obstacle to GE development.KEYWORDS: Undergraduate curriculumcollege majorgraduate employabilityhuman capitalgraduate attribute AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to sincerely thank the participants for their generous support and express their gratitude to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable insights and feedback.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Chinese universities are primarily categorised according to their strongest academic disciplines, with many institutions possessing expertise and robust research programmes in particular industries.2 In recent years, some Chinese short-form video hosting services have become popular overseas, including in Portuguese-speaking countries. They need employees who speak these languages to review videos, provide overseas customer service, and market development.
以专业为基础的本科课程是毕业生就业能力发展的障碍
摘要为了解决毕业生就业能力问题,高等教育研究者和实践者建议在大学课程中加入就业能力模块。然而,在GE文献中,以专业为基础的本科课程(MBUC)的正统性很少受到挑战。借鉴克拉克(2018)[Clarke, M.(2018)]。重新思考毕业生的就业能力:资本的作用,个人属性和环境。高等教育研究,43(11),1923-1937。https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1294152]综合就业能力模型,探讨MBUC对大学生GE发展的影响。数据来自对中国六所大学葡萄牙语专业本科生的27次访谈。研究结果表明,MBUC通过培养单一而不是复合技能,限制了他们的社交圈,从而限制了他们的行动视野,推迟了他们的职业自我管理,从而削弱了学生的就业能力。更直接的是,在某些情况下,这对通用电气的影响是生产出技术水平相同的劳动力。我们认为,在当前工作世界的许多领域,MBUC可能违背了其最初的目标,一旦实现,为特定职业提高通用电气;相反,在实践中,它已成为通用电气发展的障碍。关键词:本科课程;学院专业;毕业生就业能力;人力资本;毕业生属性致谢作者衷心感谢与会者的大力支持,感谢匿名审稿人提供的宝贵意见和反馈。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1:中国的大学主要根据其最强的学科进行分类,许多大学在特定行业拥有专业知识和强大的研究项目近年来,一些中国短视频托管服务在海外很受欢迎,包括在葡语国家。他们需要会说这些语言的员工来审核视频、提供海外客户服务和市场开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信