Artificial Intelligence and Academic Ethics in The Era of Merdeka Belajar : How Are Students' Responses?

Sariyasa Sariyasa, Ketut Ayu Lola Monika
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence and Academic Ethics in The Era of Merdeka Belajar : How Are Students' Responses?","authors":"Sariyasa Sariyasa, Ketut Ayu Lola Monika","doi":"10.33394/jk.v9i3.8720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze students' responses to using Artificial Intelligence (AI) and academic ethics in the era of independent learning. This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study method. Participants in this study were selected by purposive sampling, namely Postgraduate Students in Basic Education, Ganesha University of Education, Singaraja Campus. Data collection techniques using questionnaires and documentation. The data analysis technique was carried out descriptively by analyzing the average percentage of the questionnaire items. The results of this study showed that 56.67% of students said that AI was responsive, 89.44% of students said that AI was practical and efficient, 78.89% of students said it was interactive, 94.17% of students said it was useful in courses and design, and 94.67% said it was useful in individual learning processes. Academic ethics must also be continuously implemented when using AI in learning activities, making scientific writing assignments, making learning media with integrity, honesty, paraphrasing, and citing sources. To conclude, recommendations for higher education students should use this AI wisely.","PeriodicalId":32614,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Kependidikan Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Kependidikan Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v9i3.8720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyze students' responses to using Artificial Intelligence (AI) and academic ethics in the era of independent learning. This research uses a qualitative approach with a case study method. Participants in this study were selected by purposive sampling, namely Postgraduate Students in Basic Education, Ganesha University of Education, Singaraja Campus. Data collection techniques using questionnaires and documentation. The data analysis technique was carried out descriptively by analyzing the average percentage of the questionnaire items. The results of this study showed that 56.67% of students said that AI was responsive, 89.44% of students said that AI was practical and efficient, 78.89% of students said it was interactive, 94.17% of students said it was useful in courses and design, and 94.67% said it was useful in individual learning processes. Academic ethics must also be continuously implemented when using AI in learning activities, making scientific writing assignments, making learning media with integrity, honesty, paraphrasing, and citing sources. To conclude, recommendations for higher education students should use this AI wisely.
梅迪卡·贝拉哈尔时代的人工智能与学术伦理:学生的反应如何?
本研究采用个案研究的定性研究方法。本研究采用有目的抽样的方法,选取甘尼萨教育大学Singaraja校区基础教育研究生为研究对象。使用问卷调查和文档的数据收集技术。数据分析技术通过分析问卷项目的平均百分比进行描述性分析。本次研究结果显示,56.67%的学生认为AI具有响应性,89.44%的学生认为AI实用高效,78.89%的学生认为AI具有互动性,94.17%的学生认为AI在课程和设计中有用,94.67%的学生认为AI在个人学习过程中有用。在使用人工智能进行学习活动、进行科学写作作业、制作具有诚信、诚实、释义和引用来源的学习媒体时,也必须持续执行学术道德。总之,建议高等教育学生应该明智地使用这种人工智能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书