Analysis of Momentum and Impulse Misconceptions of College Students Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Tests

None Amira Setiani, Danny Firmansyah, Cahyani Intan Ramadhani
{"title":"Analysis of Momentum and Impulse Misconceptions of College Students Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Tests","authors":"None Amira Setiani, Danny Firmansyah, Cahyani Intan Ramadhani","doi":"10.57092/ijetz.v2i3.146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to discover misconceptions about momentum and impulse concepts. The research method used in this research is a mixed method. The subjects of this research were students majoring in physics from the classes of 2019, 2020, and 2021 who had taken the basic physics course I, with a total sample of 44 students. The instrument used was 15 four-level multiple diagnostic tests. Research data was obtained based on student answer patterns on a four-level multiple-choice test. The results of the research show that students' conceptual understanding of momentum and impulse material using the four-level diagnostic test is still relatively low, as seen from the percentage of students who partially understand the concept at 46%, understand the concept at 30%, negative misconceptions at 10%, positive misconceptions at 9%, and positive misconceptions at 5%. Some of the misconceptions experienced by students regarding the concepts of momentum and impulse include: first, students assume that only mass influences the amount of momentum; second, they assume that the total momentum of a system of isolated objects is not constant; third, assume that the total momentum of a system of isolated objects is not constant, the fourth assumes that two objects of the same mass have different speeds, the sixth assumes that changes in the speed of a particle are only influenced by force and time and the last, namely the seventh, assumes that the process of collisions on smooth surfaces will move all objects.","PeriodicalId":475145,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v2i3.146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aims to discover misconceptions about momentum and impulse concepts. The research method used in this research is a mixed method. The subjects of this research were students majoring in physics from the classes of 2019, 2020, and 2021 who had taken the basic physics course I, with a total sample of 44 students. The instrument used was 15 four-level multiple diagnostic tests. Research data was obtained based on student answer patterns on a four-level multiple-choice test. The results of the research show that students' conceptual understanding of momentum and impulse material using the four-level diagnostic test is still relatively low, as seen from the percentage of students who partially understand the concept at 46%, understand the concept at 30%, negative misconceptions at 10%, positive misconceptions at 9%, and positive misconceptions at 5%. Some of the misconceptions experienced by students regarding the concepts of momentum and impulse include: first, students assume that only mass influences the amount of momentum; second, they assume that the total momentum of a system of isolated objects is not constant; third, assume that the total momentum of a system of isolated objects is not constant, the fourth assumes that two objects of the same mass have different speeds, the sixth assumes that changes in the speed of a particle are only influenced by force and time and the last, namely the seventh, assumes that the process of collisions on smooth surfaces will move all objects.
用四层诊断测验分析大学生的动量与冲动误解
本研究旨在发现对动量和冲量概念的误解。本研究采用的研究方法是混合方法。本研究以2019、2020、2021级物理专业基础物理课程1的学生为研究对象,共44名学生。所用仪器为15项四级多重诊断试验。研究数据是根据学生在四级选择题测试中的回答模式获得的。研究结果表明,学生使用四级诊断测试对动量和冲量材料的概念理解仍然相对较低,从部分理解的比例为46%,理解的比例为30%,消极误解的比例为10%,积极误解的比例为9%,积极误解的比例为5%。学生对动量和冲量概念的一些误解包括:首先,学生认为只有质量影响动量的大小;第二,他们假设一个孤立物体系统的总动量不是恒定的;第三,假设孤立物体系统的总动量不是恒定的,第四假设相同质量的两个物体有不同的速度,第六假设粒子速度的变化只受力和时间的影响,最后,即第七,假设光滑表面上的碰撞过程会移动所有物体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书