Practical Applications of Why Should Asset Management Be Interested in New Economic Thinking?

Sergio Focardi, Frank Fabozzi
{"title":"Practical Applications of Why Should Asset Management Be Interested in New Economic Thinking?","authors":"Sergio Focardi, Frank Fabozzi","doi":"10.3905/pa.2023.pa551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In <ext-link><bold><italic>Why Should Asset Management Be Interested in New Economic Thinking?</italic></bold></ext-link> from the October 2022 issue of <italic>The Journal of Portfolio Management</italic>, authors <bold>Sergio Focardi</bold> of <bold>Franklin University</bold> and <bold>Frank Fabozzi</bold> of <bold>Johns Hopkins University</bold> explain that mainstream economic theories may be outdated and may lead asset managers to make bad decisions. Modern-day economies are complex, rapidly evolving systems where inflation, money and credit creation, and economic growth are driven by new and different factors. Moreover, modern economies are complex, evolutionary systems that are not adequately described by traditional models. Mainstream economic models failed to warn markets about the 2008 financial crisis because they did not consider the destabilizing effects of money creation and destruction when bank loans are disbursed or repaid. Additionally, the Phillips curve, which posits an inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment, failed to predict low inflation between the financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. Mainstream models also do not include innovation and quality improvements in economic growth. New and emerging theories offer potentially better insights for predicting when markets will become unstable. These theories embrace different views about the drivers of inflation, the effects of money and credit, and the significance of innovation and qualitative growth. These theories can offer insights that allow asset managers to make better investment decisions.","PeriodicalId":500434,"journal":{"name":"Practical applications of institutional investor journals","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical applications of institutional investor journals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/pa.2023.pa551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Why Should Asset Management Be Interested in New Economic Thinking? from the October 2022 issue of The Journal of Portfolio Management, authors Sergio Focardi of Franklin University and Frank Fabozzi of Johns Hopkins University explain that mainstream economic theories may be outdated and may lead asset managers to make bad decisions. Modern-day economies are complex, rapidly evolving systems where inflation, money and credit creation, and economic growth are driven by new and different factors. Moreover, modern economies are complex, evolutionary systems that are not adequately described by traditional models. Mainstream economic models failed to warn markets about the 2008 financial crisis because they did not consider the destabilizing effects of money creation and destruction when bank loans are disbursed or repaid. Additionally, the Phillips curve, which posits an inverse relationship between inflation and unemployment, failed to predict low inflation between the financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. Mainstream models also do not include innovation and quality improvements in economic growth. New and emerging theories offer potentially better insights for predicting when markets will become unstable. These theories embrace different views about the drivers of inflation, the effects of money and credit, and the significance of innovation and qualitative growth. These theories can offer insights that allow asset managers to make better investment decisions.
资产管理为什么应该对新经济思想感兴趣的实际应用?
《为什么资产管理应该对新经济思维感兴趣?》富兰克林大学的Sergio Focardi和约翰霍普金斯大学的Frank Fabozzi在《投资组合管理杂志》(the Journal of Portfolio Management) 2022年10月号上解释说,主流经济理论可能已经过时,并可能导致资产管理者做出错误的决策。现代经济是一个复杂的、快速发展的系统,其中通货膨胀、货币和信贷创造以及经济增长是由新的和不同的因素驱动的。此外,现代经济是复杂的、进化的系统,传统模型无法对其进行充分描述。主流经济模型未能就2008年金融危机向市场发出警告,因为它们没有考虑到银行贷款发放或偿还时货币创造和破坏的不稳定影响。此外,假设通货膨胀率和失业率呈反比关系的菲利普斯曲线未能预测金融危机和新冠疫情之间的低通货膨胀率。主流模式也不包括经济增长的创新和质量改善。新兴理论可能为预测市场何时变得不稳定提供更好的见解。这些理论包含了对通货膨胀的驱动因素、货币和信贷的影响、创新和质量增长的重要性的不同观点。这些理论可以为资产管理公司做出更好的投资决策提供洞见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信