The importance of the functional base-of-support for clinical biomechanical balance analysis

Lizeth Sloot, Elza van Duijnhoven, Merel A. Brehm, Tamaya Van Criekinge, Matthew Millard
{"title":"The importance of the functional base-of-support for clinical biomechanical balance analysis","authors":"Lizeth Sloot, Elza van Duijnhoven, Merel A. Brehm, Tamaya Van Criekinge, Matthew Millard","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The occurrence of falls and balance problems are common in persons of higher age or with neuromuscular disorders. While clinical balance scales are unable to accurately identify balance, biomechanical balance models (such as the extrapolated center-of-mass) need missing information on the base-of-support formed by the feet [1]. People can balance their body mass above this area formed by the feet without taking a compensatory step. Common impairments such as muscle degeneration likely decrease this support area. Therefore, we evaluated changes in the functional base-of-support (fBOS) resulting from ageing and neuromuscular disorders and the impact on gait balance analysis. We assessed the fBOS in 20 young persons (28±7 yrs), 7 with lower leg muscle weakness due to slowly progressive neuromuscular disorders (63±5 yrs; caption Fig. 1), 7 age-matched middle-aged (62±8 yrs) and 7 old persons (80±3 yrs). Ground forces and foot markers were recorded while participants slowly moved their center-of-pressure in as large circles as possible without moving their feet. The fBOS is modeled was the convex hull enclosing this circled area normalized to marker-based foot dimensions [2]. The effect of ageing of the fBOS on dynamic balance outcomes during walking at heel strike (anterior-posterior direction) was assessed in a dataset of 138 persons across the lifespan [3,4]. The fBOS was only 24% of the foot outline formed by markers for young persons (Fig. 1A) and is 84% smaller in patients with neuromuscular disorders (pttest<0.001). The fBOS decreased with age (pANOVA=0.003), with similar values in mid-age (-24%, pttest=0.11) and a 52% decrease in old age (pttest=0.002) compared to young (Fig. 1A). When taken the fBOS into account, dynamic balance shifts from inside to outside the support area. Extrapolating the age-reduction in fBOS, balance changes from increasing to decreasing with age. Fig. 1: Functional Base of Support (fBOS) for the different participant groups.Download : Download high-res image (333KB)Download : Download full-size image Studies overlook the base-of-support as part of dynamic balance analysis [1]. This study shows the importance of using an accurate model of the fBOS, as a single reference marker does not capture 1) the shape of the effective fBOS; 2) the effects of age and disorder; and 3) changes over the gait cycle. Use of the fBOS revealed reductions in balance in older persons, compared to safer margins without the fBOS. The large group variances indicate that individual fBOS measurements are needed for precise balance assessment. We provide the fBOS model per group and code to apply this to measured markers, so researchers can establish clinical meaningful differences in dynamic balance outcomes. As such, this study strives towards the integration of accurate biomechanical balance analysis in clinical gait analysis.","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The occurrence of falls and balance problems are common in persons of higher age or with neuromuscular disorders. While clinical balance scales are unable to accurately identify balance, biomechanical balance models (such as the extrapolated center-of-mass) need missing information on the base-of-support formed by the feet [1]. People can balance their body mass above this area formed by the feet without taking a compensatory step. Common impairments such as muscle degeneration likely decrease this support area. Therefore, we evaluated changes in the functional base-of-support (fBOS) resulting from ageing and neuromuscular disorders and the impact on gait balance analysis. We assessed the fBOS in 20 young persons (28±7 yrs), 7 with lower leg muscle weakness due to slowly progressive neuromuscular disorders (63±5 yrs; caption Fig. 1), 7 age-matched middle-aged (62±8 yrs) and 7 old persons (80±3 yrs). Ground forces and foot markers were recorded while participants slowly moved their center-of-pressure in as large circles as possible without moving their feet. The fBOS is modeled was the convex hull enclosing this circled area normalized to marker-based foot dimensions [2]. The effect of ageing of the fBOS on dynamic balance outcomes during walking at heel strike (anterior-posterior direction) was assessed in a dataset of 138 persons across the lifespan [3,4]. The fBOS was only 24% of the foot outline formed by markers for young persons (Fig. 1A) and is 84% smaller in patients with neuromuscular disorders (pttest<0.001). The fBOS decreased with age (pANOVA=0.003), with similar values in mid-age (-24%, pttest=0.11) and a 52% decrease in old age (pttest=0.002) compared to young (Fig. 1A). When taken the fBOS into account, dynamic balance shifts from inside to outside the support area. Extrapolating the age-reduction in fBOS, balance changes from increasing to decreasing with age. Fig. 1: Functional Base of Support (fBOS) for the different participant groups.Download : Download high-res image (333KB)Download : Download full-size image Studies overlook the base-of-support as part of dynamic balance analysis [1]. This study shows the importance of using an accurate model of the fBOS, as a single reference marker does not capture 1) the shape of the effective fBOS; 2) the effects of age and disorder; and 3) changes over the gait cycle. Use of the fBOS revealed reductions in balance in older persons, compared to safer margins without the fBOS. The large group variances indicate that individual fBOS measurements are needed for precise balance assessment. We provide the fBOS model per group and code to apply this to measured markers, so researchers can establish clinical meaningful differences in dynamic balance outcomes. As such, this study strives towards the integration of accurate biomechanical balance analysis in clinical gait analysis.
功能支撑基础对临床生物力学平衡分析的重要性
跌倒和平衡问题的发生在老年人或神经肌肉疾病患者中很常见。虽然临床平衡量表无法准确识别平衡,但生物力学平衡模型(如外推质心)需要缺少足部支撑基础的信息[1]。人们可以在这个由脚形成的区域上平衡他们的体重,而不需要采取补充步骤。常见的损伤如肌肉退化可能会减少这一支撑区域。因此,我们评估了衰老和神经肌肉疾病导致的功能支持基础(fBOS)的变化以及对步态平衡分析的影响。我们评估了20名年轻人(28±7岁)的fBOS, 7名因缓慢进行性神经肌肉疾病而下肢肌肉无力(63±5岁;图1),年龄匹配的中年人(62±8岁)7人,老年人(80±3岁)7人。地面力量和脚部标记被记录下来,同时参与者在不移动脚的情况下尽可能大范围地缓慢移动他们的压力中心。fBOS被建模为包围该圆圈区域的凸壳,归一化为基于标记的脚尺寸[2]。在138人的数据集中评估了fBOS老化对足跟撞击(前后方向)行走时动态平衡结果的影响[3,4]。fBOS仅占年轻人标记物形成的足部轮廓的24%(图1A),神经肌肉疾病患者的fBOS小84% (pttest<0.001)。fBOS随着年龄的增长而下降(pANOVA=0.003),与年轻人相比,中年人的fBOS值相似(-24%,pttest=0.11),老年人的fBOS值下降52% (pttest=0.002)(图1A)。当考虑到fBOS时,动态平衡从内部转移到外部支持区域。推断fBOS的年龄减少,平衡随着年龄的增长从增加到减少。图1:不同参与者群体的功能支持基础(fBOS)。下载:下载高分辨率图片(333KB)下载:下载全尺寸图片作为动平衡分析的一部分,研究忽略了支撑基础[1]。这项研究显示了使用精确的fBOS模型的重要性,因为单一的参考标记不能捕获1)有效fBOS的形状;2)年龄和紊乱的影响;3)步态周期的变化。与不使用fBOS的安全边缘相比,使用fBOS显示老年人平衡能力下降。较大的组方差表明,需要单独的fBOS测量来进行精确的平衡评估。我们提供了每个组的fBOS模型和代码,将其应用于测量的标记物,因此研究人员可以建立动态平衡结果的临床有意义的差异。因此,本研究致力于将准确的生物力学平衡分析整合到临床步态分析中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信