Subtalar joint axis alignments in pathological feet of children with cerebral palsy

Erik Meilak, Ruud Wellenberg, Wouter Schallig, Andrew Roberts, Melinda Witbreuk, Annemieke Buizer, Mario Maas, Marjolein van der Krogt, Luca Modenese, Caroline Stewart
{"title":"Subtalar joint axis alignments in pathological feet of children with cerebral palsy","authors":"Erik Meilak, Ruud Wellenberg, Wouter Schallig, Andrew Roberts, Melinda Witbreuk, Annemieke Buizer, Mario Maas, Marjolein van der Krogt, Luca Modenese, Caroline Stewart","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Children suffering cerebral palsy (CP) often develop foot deformities [1]. These manifest as pathological postures including equinovarus, planovalgus non-midfoot break (PNMFB) and midfoot break (MFB) [2]. Although the mechanism for the development of foot deformity is poorly understood, recent research has highlighted how sensitive muscle moment arms [3] and joint moments are to the orientation of the subtalar joint (STJ) axis. Both are contributors to foot deformity. Studies have demonstrated a large variability in STJ axis orientations in healthy populations [4] and it is hypothesised that the variability in deformed feet will be even higher and correlate with specific deformities. How do STJ axis orientations in CP children with equinovarus, PNMFB and MFB deformities compare with typically developing children? Weight bearing (WB) and non-weight bearing (NWB) cone beam CT images of 21 feet from 17 CP patients (8 equinovarus, 7 PNMFB, 6 MFB, aged 12-17) and 7 feet from 7 typically-developing controls (aged 7-16) were acquired using a Verity (Planmed Oy) and Multitom Rax (Siemens) CBCT systems. Foot bones were semi-automatically segmented using Mimics 24.0, Materialize or Disior Bonelogic and remeshed to 1.0 mm isotropic edge length (OpenFlipper 4.1). Using the STAPLE pipeline [5], spheres were fitted to the talar head and talocalcaneal articulating surfaces and a cylinder to the talocrural articulating surface. STJ axis was approximated by the line joining the two fitted spheres [6]. The talocrural joint axis was approximated by the cylinder fitted to the talocrural articulating surface. An anterior-posterior (AP) line was calculated as the cross product of the ground normal and the talocrural joint axis. For each participant, STJ axis medial deviation and inclination from the AP line was calculated. A 2-sample t-test was used to test for statistically significant differences between groups. Mean STJ axis orientation in healthy participants was 23.2±5.7° (inclination) and 22.0±4.3° (medial deviation, Fig. 1). Inclinations varied from 31.4±6.3° for equinovarus feet to 20.2±4.2 for PNMFB and 4.0±10.6° for MFB patients. Mean medial deviations were 32.7±10.5° (equinovarus), 25.4±6.5° (PNMFB), and 28.8±4.5° (MFB). Both MFB and equinovarus groups exhibited STJ axis medial deviation angles greater than healthy controls. However, where the equinovarus group demonstrated 8.2° (p<0.05) greater inclination angle than the healthy controls, the MFB feet exhibited inclination angles 19.2° lower (p<0.05).Download : Download high-res image (99KB)Download : Download full-size image Although the analysis shows clear groupings in STJ axis orientations, further analyses of a greater range of CP pathological feet are needed to confirm these differences between groups. The abnormal STJ axis orientations of the deformed feet imply that abnormal moments are present during gait, further contributing to deformity. In conclusion, there is a measurable difference between the STJ orientations between pathological CP and healthy feet. Understanding how these differences contribute to deformity will inform the development of effective interventions.","PeriodicalId":94018,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.07.152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children suffering cerebral palsy (CP) often develop foot deformities [1]. These manifest as pathological postures including equinovarus, planovalgus non-midfoot break (PNMFB) and midfoot break (MFB) [2]. Although the mechanism for the development of foot deformity is poorly understood, recent research has highlighted how sensitive muscle moment arms [3] and joint moments are to the orientation of the subtalar joint (STJ) axis. Both are contributors to foot deformity. Studies have demonstrated a large variability in STJ axis orientations in healthy populations [4] and it is hypothesised that the variability in deformed feet will be even higher and correlate with specific deformities. How do STJ axis orientations in CP children with equinovarus, PNMFB and MFB deformities compare with typically developing children? Weight bearing (WB) and non-weight bearing (NWB) cone beam CT images of 21 feet from 17 CP patients (8 equinovarus, 7 PNMFB, 6 MFB, aged 12-17) and 7 feet from 7 typically-developing controls (aged 7-16) were acquired using a Verity (Planmed Oy) and Multitom Rax (Siemens) CBCT systems. Foot bones were semi-automatically segmented using Mimics 24.0, Materialize or Disior Bonelogic and remeshed to 1.0 mm isotropic edge length (OpenFlipper 4.1). Using the STAPLE pipeline [5], spheres were fitted to the talar head and talocalcaneal articulating surfaces and a cylinder to the talocrural articulating surface. STJ axis was approximated by the line joining the two fitted spheres [6]. The talocrural joint axis was approximated by the cylinder fitted to the talocrural articulating surface. An anterior-posterior (AP) line was calculated as the cross product of the ground normal and the talocrural joint axis. For each participant, STJ axis medial deviation and inclination from the AP line was calculated. A 2-sample t-test was used to test for statistically significant differences between groups. Mean STJ axis orientation in healthy participants was 23.2±5.7° (inclination) and 22.0±4.3° (medial deviation, Fig. 1). Inclinations varied from 31.4±6.3° for equinovarus feet to 20.2±4.2 for PNMFB and 4.0±10.6° for MFB patients. Mean medial deviations were 32.7±10.5° (equinovarus), 25.4±6.5° (PNMFB), and 28.8±4.5° (MFB). Both MFB and equinovarus groups exhibited STJ axis medial deviation angles greater than healthy controls. However, where the equinovarus group demonstrated 8.2° (p<0.05) greater inclination angle than the healthy controls, the MFB feet exhibited inclination angles 19.2° lower (p<0.05).Download : Download high-res image (99KB)Download : Download full-size image Although the analysis shows clear groupings in STJ axis orientations, further analyses of a greater range of CP pathological feet are needed to confirm these differences between groups. The abnormal STJ axis orientations of the deformed feet imply that abnormal moments are present during gait, further contributing to deformity. In conclusion, there is a measurable difference between the STJ orientations between pathological CP and healthy feet. Understanding how these differences contribute to deformity will inform the development of effective interventions.
脑瘫患儿病理性足的距下关节轴排列
脑瘫(CP)患儿常出现足部畸形[1]。这些表现为病态姿势,包括马蹄内翻、平外翻非足中骨折(PNMFB)和足中骨折(MFB)[2]。尽管足部畸形发展的机制尚不清楚,但最近的研究强调了肌肉力矩臂[3]和关节力矩对距下关节(STJ)轴方向的敏感程度。两者都是导致足部畸形的原因。研究表明,健康人群中STJ轴方向有很大的变异性[4],假设畸形足的变异性甚至更高,并与特定的畸形相关。CP伴马内翻、PNMFB和MFB畸形患儿与正常发育患儿相比,STJ轴方向如何?使用Verity (Planmed Oy)和Multitom Rax (Siemens) CBCT系统获取17例CP患者(8例马蹄内翻,7例PNMFB, 6例MFB,年龄12-17岁)21英尺的负重(WB)和非负重(NWB)锥束CT图像,以及7例正常发育对照(7-16岁)7英尺的锥形束CT图像。使用Mimics 24.0, Materialize或Disior bonlogic对足骨进行半自动分割,并重新网格化到1.0 mm各向同性边缘长度(OpenFlipper 4.1)。使用STAPLE管道[5],将球体安装到距骨头和距骨跟关节面,并将圆柱体安装到距骨胫部关节面。STJ轴近似为两个拟合球体的连接线[6]。用装配在距骨关节面上的圆柱体近似距骨关节轴。前后(AP)线作为地法线与距膝关节轴的叉积计算。对于每个参与者,计算STJ轴内侧偏离和AP线的倾斜度。采用双样本t检验检验组间差异是否具有统计学意义。健康参与者的平均STJ轴方向为23.2±5.7°(倾斜)和22.0±4.3°(内侧偏差,图1)。倾斜从马内翻足的31.4±6.3°到PNMFB的20.2±4.2°和MFB患者的4.0±10.6°不等。平均内侧偏度为32.7±10.5°(马内翻),25.4±6.5°(PNMFB)和28.8±4.5°(MFB)。MFB组和马蹄内翻组的STJ轴内侧偏角均大于健康对照组。然而,马蹄内翻组的足倾角比健康对照组大8.2°(p<0.05),而MFB组的足倾角比健康对照组小19.2°(p<0.05)。虽然分析在STJ轴方向上显示了明确的分组,但需要进一步分析更大范围的CP病理足来确认组间的差异。畸形足的STJ轴方向异常意味着步态中存在异常时刻,进一步导致畸形。总之,病理CP与健康足的STJ取向存在可测量的差异。了解这些差异是如何导致畸形的,将有助于制定有效的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信