The first experience of using the "Senhance" robotic surgical system during cholecystectomy

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
M.A. Kashtalian, Ie.A. Kvasnevskyi, O.A. Kvasnevskyi
{"title":"The first experience of using the \"Senhance\" robotic surgical system during cholecystectomy","authors":"M.A. Kashtalian, Ie.A. Kvasnevskyi, O.A. Kvasnevskyi","doi":"10.26641/2307-0404.2023.3.289167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of our study was to evaluate the differences in intra­operative and postoperative outcomes of cholecystectomy using the Senhance robotic platform and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A retrospective analysis of medical cases history of patients who underwent cholecystectomy from December 2021 to February 2022 was conducted. The treatment outcomes of patients with chronic calculous cholecystitis who underwent robotic cholecystectomy (RC) were compared with those who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Robotic cholecystectomy was performed using the Senhance robotic platform. The RC and LC groups were matched for age, sex, body mass index and compared for the duration of the operation and hospital stay. For normally distributed data, the mean and standard deviation, determined using the Shapiro-Wilk test (p-value>0.05), were applied. Median and interquartile range (IQR) were also used. Difference between cohorts - 95% confidence interval (95% Confidence Interval) were estimated for normally distributed data. Data analysis was performed using standard summary statistics on the Jamovi 2.2.5 platform. Data were processed using application program packages. All surgical procedures were performed by two surgeons from Odesa National Medical University. Robotic cholecystectomy was performed on 18 pa­tients and laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed on 20 patients. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of length of hospital stay, blood loss or complications. There were no bile duct injuries, intra­operative complications, or conversions in either group. The only statistically significant difference was the total time under anesthesia (p>0.05), which was longer in the robotic cholecystectomy group. Cholecystectomy using the Senhance robotic platform was found to be safe, with an average operative time of 35.2±5.0 minutes, while the duration of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 32.2±3.3 minutes. The study results showed that robotic cholecystectomy using the Senhance system is safe and effective. The use of robotic systems can improve precision and control during surgery, reduce blood loss and complications.","PeriodicalId":41059,"journal":{"name":"Medical Perspectives-Medicni Perspektivi","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Perspectives-Medicni Perspektivi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26641/2307-0404.2023.3.289167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of our study was to evaluate the differences in intra­operative and postoperative outcomes of cholecystectomy using the Senhance robotic platform and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A retrospective analysis of medical cases history of patients who underwent cholecystectomy from December 2021 to February 2022 was conducted. The treatment outcomes of patients with chronic calculous cholecystitis who underwent robotic cholecystectomy (RC) were compared with those who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Robotic cholecystectomy was performed using the Senhance robotic platform. The RC and LC groups were matched for age, sex, body mass index and compared for the duration of the operation and hospital stay. For normally distributed data, the mean and standard deviation, determined using the Shapiro-Wilk test (p-value>0.05), were applied. Median and interquartile range (IQR) were also used. Difference between cohorts - 95% confidence interval (95% Confidence Interval) were estimated for normally distributed data. Data analysis was performed using standard summary statistics on the Jamovi 2.2.5 platform. Data were processed using application program packages. All surgical procedures were performed by two surgeons from Odesa National Medical University. Robotic cholecystectomy was performed on 18 pa­tients and laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed on 20 patients. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of length of hospital stay, blood loss or complications. There were no bile duct injuries, intra­operative complications, or conversions in either group. The only statistically significant difference was the total time under anesthesia (p>0.05), which was longer in the robotic cholecystectomy group. Cholecystectomy using the Senhance robotic platform was found to be safe, with an average operative time of 35.2±5.0 minutes, while the duration of laparoscopic cholecystectomy was 32.2±3.3 minutes. The study results showed that robotic cholecystectomy using the Senhance system is safe and effective. The use of robotic systems can improve precision and control during surgery, reduce blood loss and complications.
在胆囊切除术中首次使用“增强”机器人手术系统
本研究的目的是评估使用enhance机器人平台和腹腔镜胆囊切除术的术中和术后结果的差异。回顾性分析2021年12月至2022年2月胆囊切除术患者的病历。对慢性结石性胆囊炎患者行机器人胆囊切除术(RC)与腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的治疗结果进行比较。采用senance机器人平台进行机器人胆囊切除术。RC组和LC组的年龄、性别、体重指数相匹配,并比较手术时间和住院时间。对于正态分布的数据,采用Shapiro-Wilk检验(p-value>0.05)确定均值和标准差。中位数和四分位数范围(IQR)也被使用。对正态分布的数据估计队列间的差异- 95%置信区间(95%置信区间)。使用Jamovi 2.2.5平台上的标准汇总统计数据进行数据分析。使用应用程序包对数据进行处理。所有手术均由敖德萨国立医科大学的两名外科医生进行。其中机器人胆囊切除术18例,腹腔镜胆囊切除术20例。在住院时间、出血量或并发症方面,两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。两组均无胆管损伤、术中并发症或转归。唯一有统计学意义的差异是麻醉总时间(p>0.05),机器人胆囊切除术组麻醉总时间更长。采用Senhance机器人平台进行胆囊切除术是安全的,平均手术时间为35.2±5.0分钟,而腹腔镜胆囊切除术时间为32.2±3.3分钟。研究结果表明,采用增强系统进行机器人胆囊切除术安全有效。机器人系统的使用可以提高手术的精度和控制,减少失血和并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Perspectives-Medicni Perspektivi
Medical Perspectives-Medicni Perspektivi MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信