The North Caucasus: Factor Analysis and Forecasts of the Regional Situation Dynamics

IF 0.4 Q3 AREA STUDIES
Viktor A. Avksent’ev, Galina D. Gritsenko
{"title":"The North Caucasus: Factor Analysis and Forecasts of the Regional Situation Dynamics","authors":"Viktor A. Avksent’ev, Galina D. Gritsenko","doi":"10.15507/2413-1407.124.031.202303.442-458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. By the beginning of the third decade of the 21st century approaches to assessments and forecasts of the situation in the North Caucasus have changed in the doctrinal documents of the Russian Federation, the region is no longer interpreted as requiring priority attention of the state. The article sets out the task of analyzing the controversial results of the development of the North Caucasian Federal District and on the basis of this analysis to make a forecast for the development of the ethnopolitical situation in the North Caucasus until the middle of the current decade. Materials and Methods. The section identifies the sources of the empirical base, the main of which are the official data of Rosstat. The combination of quantitative (analysis of official documents) and qualitative (discourse analysis) research methods has expanded the possibilities of analyzing the obtained data and ensures the reliability of the results. Results. It is asserted that most of the factors of aggravation of the regional situation at the turn of the first and second decades of the 21st century continue to produce risks in the third decade. Palliative improvements in the economy and other areas of the North Caucasian community are shown. However, the main targets set out at the moment of the creation of the North Caucasian Federal District in 2010 have not been achieved. At the same time, economic problems do not have a significant destabilizing effect on ethnopolitical processes, the greatest risks are concentrated in the institutional sphere. Discussion and Conclusion. The conclusion is made about the possibility of maintaining a moderate conflictological scenario for the development of the regional situation until the middle of the third decade of the 21st century. Further clarification of conflictological scenarios should be carried out taking into account the unfolding “hybrid war”, in the context of which the problems of ethnic relations should once again become the object of special attention of the state; it is important to restore at the doctrinal level the status of the North Caucasus as a region of priority importance for the security of the state. The conclusions made in the article may be of interest to practical politicians, including the development and adjustment of regional strategies and concepts of national policy.","PeriodicalId":53833,"journal":{"name":"Regionologiya-Regionology Russian Journal of Regional Studies","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regionologiya-Regionology Russian Journal of Regional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.124.031.202303.442-458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. By the beginning of the third decade of the 21st century approaches to assessments and forecasts of the situation in the North Caucasus have changed in the doctrinal documents of the Russian Federation, the region is no longer interpreted as requiring priority attention of the state. The article sets out the task of analyzing the controversial results of the development of the North Caucasian Federal District and on the basis of this analysis to make a forecast for the development of the ethnopolitical situation in the North Caucasus until the middle of the current decade. Materials and Methods. The section identifies the sources of the empirical base, the main of which are the official data of Rosstat. The combination of quantitative (analysis of official documents) and qualitative (discourse analysis) research methods has expanded the possibilities of analyzing the obtained data and ensures the reliability of the results. Results. It is asserted that most of the factors of aggravation of the regional situation at the turn of the first and second decades of the 21st century continue to produce risks in the third decade. Palliative improvements in the economy and other areas of the North Caucasian community are shown. However, the main targets set out at the moment of the creation of the North Caucasian Federal District in 2010 have not been achieved. At the same time, economic problems do not have a significant destabilizing effect on ethnopolitical processes, the greatest risks are concentrated in the institutional sphere. Discussion and Conclusion. The conclusion is made about the possibility of maintaining a moderate conflictological scenario for the development of the regional situation until the middle of the third decade of the 21st century. Further clarification of conflictological scenarios should be carried out taking into account the unfolding “hybrid war”, in the context of which the problems of ethnic relations should once again become the object of special attention of the state; it is important to restore at the doctrinal level the status of the North Caucasus as a region of priority importance for the security of the state. The conclusions made in the article may be of interest to practical politicians, including the development and adjustment of regional strategies and concepts of national policy.
北高加索:区域形势动态的因素分析与预测
介绍。到21世纪第三个十年开始时,俄罗斯联邦的理论文件中对北高加索局势的评估和预测的方法发生了变化,该地区不再被解释为需要国家优先关注的地区。本文的任务是分析北高加索联邦区发展中有争议的结果,并在此基础上对北高加索地区民族政治局势的发展做出预测,直至本十年中期。材料与方法。本节确定了经验基础的来源,其中主要是俄罗斯国家统计局的官方数据。定量(官方文件分析)和定性(话语分析)相结合的研究方法扩大了分析所得数据的可能性,保证了结果的可靠性。结果。有人断言,21世纪第一个十年和第二个十年之初导致地区局势恶化的大多数因素在第三个十年继续产生风险。北高加索社区的经济和其他领域出现了缓和的改善。然而,2010年建立北高加索联邦区时制定的主要目标尚未实现。与此同时,经济问题对民族政治进程没有重大的不稳定影响,最大的风险集中在体制领域。讨论与结论。得出的结论是,在21世纪第三个十年中期之前,维持区域局势发展的适度冲突情景的可能性。在进一步澄清冲突情况时,应考虑到正在展开的“混合战争”,在这种情况下,民族关系问题应再次成为国家特别关注的对象;重要的是在理论层面上恢复北高加索作为国家安全优先重要区域的地位。本文得出的结论可能对实际的政治家感兴趣,包括区域战略和国家政策概念的发展和调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信