Advancing chemical safety assessment through an omics-based characterization of the test system-chemical interaction

IF 3.6 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Giusy del Giudice, Giorgia Migliaccio, Nicoletta D’Alessandro, Laura Aliisa Saarimäki, Marcella Torres Maia, Maria Emilia Annala, Jenni Leppänen, Lena Mӧbus, Alisa Pavel, Maaret Vaani, Anna Vallius, Laura Ylä‐Outinen, Dario Greco, Angela Serra
{"title":"Advancing chemical safety assessment through an omics-based characterization of the test system-chemical interaction","authors":"Giusy del Giudice, Giorgia Migliaccio, Nicoletta D’Alessandro, Laura Aliisa Saarimäki, Marcella Torres Maia, Maria Emilia Annala, Jenni Leppänen, Lena Mӧbus, Alisa Pavel, Maaret Vaani, Anna Vallius, Laura Ylä‐Outinen, Dario Greco, Angela Serra","doi":"10.3389/ftox.2023.1294780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessing chemical safety is essential to evaluate the potential risks of chemical exposure to human health and the environment. Traditional methods relying on animal testing are being replaced by 3R (reduction, refinement, and replacement) principle-based alternatives, mainly depending on in vitro test methods and the Adverse Outcome Pathway framework. However, these approaches often focus on the properties of the compound, missing the broader chemical-biological interaction perspective. Currently, the lack of comprehensive molecular characterization of the in vitro test system results in limited real-world representation and contextualization of the toxicological effect under study. Leveraging omics data strengthens the understanding of the responses of different biological systems, emphasizing holistic chemical-biological interactions when developing in vitro methods. Here, we discuss the relevance of meticulous test system characterization on two safety assessment relevant scenarios and how omics-based, data-driven approaches can improve the future generation of alternative methods.","PeriodicalId":73111,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2023.1294780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessing chemical safety is essential to evaluate the potential risks of chemical exposure to human health and the environment. Traditional methods relying on animal testing are being replaced by 3R (reduction, refinement, and replacement) principle-based alternatives, mainly depending on in vitro test methods and the Adverse Outcome Pathway framework. However, these approaches often focus on the properties of the compound, missing the broader chemical-biological interaction perspective. Currently, the lack of comprehensive molecular characterization of the in vitro test system results in limited real-world representation and contextualization of the toxicological effect under study. Leveraging omics data strengthens the understanding of the responses of different biological systems, emphasizing holistic chemical-biological interactions when developing in vitro methods. Here, we discuss the relevance of meticulous test system characterization on two safety assessment relevant scenarios and how omics-based, data-driven approaches can improve the future generation of alternative methods.
通过基于组学的测试系统-化学相互作用表征推进化学品安全评估
评估化学品安全对于评估化学品接触对人类健康和环境的潜在风险至关重要。依赖动物试验的传统方法正在被基于3R(还原、细化和替代)原则的替代方法所取代,这些替代方法主要依赖于体外试验方法和Adverse Outcome Pathway框架。然而,这些方法往往侧重于化合物的性质,而忽略了更广泛的化学-生物相互作用的观点。目前,由于缺乏对体外测试系统的全面分子表征,导致所研究的毒理学效应在现实世界中的代表性和情境化受到限制。利用组学数据加强了对不同生物系统反应的理解,在开发体外方法时强调了整体的化学-生物相互作用。在这里,我们讨论了细致的测试系统表征与两种安全评估相关场景的相关性,以及基于组学的数据驱动方法如何改进替代方法的未来生成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信