The Spanish- and English-Language Literacy Impacts of Descubriendo la Lectura across Three Experimental Replications

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Trisha H. Borman, Geoffrey D. Borman, So Jung Park, Bo Zhu, Scott Houghton
{"title":"The Spanish- and English-Language Literacy Impacts of <i>Descubriendo la Lectura</i> across Three Experimental Replications","authors":"Trisha H. Borman, Geoffrey D. Borman, So Jung Park, Bo Zhu, Scott Houghton","doi":"10.1080/19345747.2023.2269936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractWe present findings across three randomized trials of Descubriendo la Lectura (DLL), an intervention designed to improve literacy skills of Spanish-speaking first graders struggling with reading. DLL is a one-to-one Spanish-language literacy program lasting 12–20 weeks offered to a school’s lowest performing emerging bilingual first graders. Directly replicating procedures across three cohorts, we examined Spanish and English literacy outcomes for approximately 400 students across 30 schools, 10 districts, and five states. Analyses revealed statistically significant effects of student-level assignment to DLL on all 11 Spanish-language outcomes, with an average impact of d = 0.57. Impacts across the four English-language outcomes were positive but not statistically significant. Descriptive results suggest that the Spanish-language impacts are reliably replicated, most likely due to the intervention’s strong implementation supports.Keywords: Early literacyEnglish learnershigh-intensity tutoringrandomized controlled trialreplication Open ScholarshipThis article has earned the Center for Open Science badge for Open Data. The data are openly accessible at https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/193586/version/V1/view.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 See https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc.2 The WWC reviews of these studies are available at https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/study/89881 and https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Study/90683.3 IdO is the Spanish version of RR’s Observation Survey (Clay, Citation2019), which tests six literacy tasks (letter identification, word test [i.e., reading vocabulary], concepts about print, writing vocabulary, phonemic awareness, and text reading) that, taken together, can measure emerging literacy abilities for early readers.4 The Logramos is an evidence-based Spanish-language literacy assessment that parallels the English-language Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS) and is used to monitor growth and achievement in Spanish literacy skills.5 See https://charts.intensiveintervention.org/screening/tool/?id=77c5c64492268897.6 See https://www.pearsonassessments.com/store/usassessments/en/Store/Professional-Assessments/Academic-Learning/Brief/Aprenda%3A-La-Prueba-de-Logros-en-Espa%C3%B1ol-%7C-Tercera-edici%C3%B3n/p/100000585.html.7 See https://riversideinsights.com/log_tercera.8 Specifically, we rank ordered the statistically significant findings within the domain in ascending order of the p-values, such that p1 ≤ p2 ≤ p3 ≤ p4 ≤ p5 ≤ p6 ≤ pM. For each p-value, p1-M, we computed: pi = αi/M, where i is the rank for pi, with i = 1, 2, . . . M; M is the total number of findings within the domain; and α is the target level of statistical significance.Additional informationFundingThe research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through [Grant #R305A160060] to the American Institutes for Research. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education.","PeriodicalId":47260,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2023.2269936","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractWe present findings across three randomized trials of Descubriendo la Lectura (DLL), an intervention designed to improve literacy skills of Spanish-speaking first graders struggling with reading. DLL is a one-to-one Spanish-language literacy program lasting 12–20 weeks offered to a school’s lowest performing emerging bilingual first graders. Directly replicating procedures across three cohorts, we examined Spanish and English literacy outcomes for approximately 400 students across 30 schools, 10 districts, and five states. Analyses revealed statistically significant effects of student-level assignment to DLL on all 11 Spanish-language outcomes, with an average impact of d = 0.57. Impacts across the four English-language outcomes were positive but not statistically significant. Descriptive results suggest that the Spanish-language impacts are reliably replicated, most likely due to the intervention’s strong implementation supports.Keywords: Early literacyEnglish learnershigh-intensity tutoringrandomized controlled trialreplication Open ScholarshipThis article has earned the Center for Open Science badge for Open Data. The data are openly accessible at https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/193586/version/V1/view.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 See https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc.2 The WWC reviews of these studies are available at https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/study/89881 and https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Study/90683.3 IdO is the Spanish version of RR’s Observation Survey (Clay, Citation2019), which tests six literacy tasks (letter identification, word test [i.e., reading vocabulary], concepts about print, writing vocabulary, phonemic awareness, and text reading) that, taken together, can measure emerging literacy abilities for early readers.4 The Logramos is an evidence-based Spanish-language literacy assessment that parallels the English-language Iowa Test of Basic Skills (ITBS) and is used to monitor growth and achievement in Spanish literacy skills.5 See https://charts.intensiveintervention.org/screening/tool/?id=77c5c64492268897.6 See https://www.pearsonassessments.com/store/usassessments/en/Store/Professional-Assessments/Academic-Learning/Brief/Aprenda%3A-La-Prueba-de-Logros-en-Espa%C3%B1ol-%7C-Tercera-edici%C3%B3n/p/100000585.html.7 See https://riversideinsights.com/log_tercera.8 Specifically, we rank ordered the statistically significant findings within the domain in ascending order of the p-values, such that p1 ≤ p2 ≤ p3 ≤ p4 ≤ p5 ≤ p6 ≤ pM. For each p-value, p1-M, we computed: pi = αi/M, where i is the rank for pi, with i = 1, 2, . . . M; M is the total number of findings within the domain; and α is the target level of statistical significance.Additional informationFundingThe research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through [Grant #R305A160060] to the American Institutes for Research. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education.
西班牙语和英语读写能力在三个实验重复中的影响
摘要本文介绍了三个随机试验的结果,DLL是一种旨在提高西班牙语一年级学生阅读能力的干预措施。DLL是一个一对一的西班牙语扫盲项目,为期12-20周,面向学校表现最差的新兴双语一年级学生。我们对30所学校、10个地区和5个州的大约400名学生的西班牙语和英语读写能力结果进行了直接复制。分析显示,学生水平的DLL分配对所有11种西班牙语结果的统计显著影响,平均影响为d = 0.57。四种英语结果的影响是积极的,但在统计上不显著。描述性结果表明,西班牙语的影响是可靠地复制的,很可能是由于干预措施的强有力的实施支持。关键词:早期读写能力英语学习者高强度辅导随机对照试验复制开放奖学金本文获得了开放数据中心的开放科学徽章这些数据可在https://www.openicpsr.org/openicpsr/project/193586/version/V1/view.Disclosure上公开获取。声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1见https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc.2 WWC对这些研究的评论可在https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/study/89881和https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Study/90683.3上获得。IdO是RR观察调查的西班牙语版本(Clay, Citation2019),它测试了六项读写任务(字母识别、单词测试[即阅读词汇]、印刷概念、写作词汇、音位意识和文本阅读),这些任务加在一起,能否衡量早期读者的识字能力Logramos是一种基于证据的西班牙语读写能力评估,与英语爱荷华州基本技能测试(ITBS)类似,用于监测西班牙语读写能力的增长和成就参见https://charts.intensiveintervention.org/screening/tool/?id=77c5c64492268897.6参见https://www.pearsonassessments.com/store/usassessments/en/Store/Professional-Assessments/Academic-Learning/Brief/Aprenda%3A-La-Prueba-de-Logros-en-Espa%C3%B1ol-%7C-Tercera-edici%C3%B3n/p/100000585.html.7参见https://riversideinsights.com/log_tercera.8具体地说,我们按照p值的升序对域内的统计显著性发现进行排序,p1≤p2≤p3≤p4≤p5≤p6≤pM。对于每个p值p1-M,我们计算:pi = αi/M,其中i是pi的秩,其中i = 1,2,…M;M是域内发现的总数;α为具有统计学显著性的目标水平。本研究报告由美国教育部教育科学研究所通过[Grant #R305A160060]资助给美国研究所。所表达的观点是作者的观点,不代表研究所或美国教育部的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness
Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: As the flagship publication for the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, the Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness (JREE) publishes original articles from the multidisciplinary community of researchers who are committed to applying principles of scientific inquiry to the study of educational problems. Articles published in JREE should advance our knowledge of factors important for educational success and/or improve our ability to conduct further disciplined studies of pressing educational problems. JREE welcomes manuscripts that fit into one of the following categories: (1) intervention, evaluation, and policy studies; (2) theory, contexts, and mechanisms; and (3) methodological studies. The first category includes studies that focus on process and implementation and seek to demonstrate causal claims in educational research. The second category includes meta-analyses and syntheses, descriptive studies that illuminate educational conditions and contexts, and studies that rigorously investigate education processes and mechanism. The third category includes studies that advance our understanding of theoretical and technical features of measurement and research design and describe advances in data analysis and data modeling. To establish a stronger connection between scientific evidence and educational practice, studies submitted to JREE should focus on pressing problems found in classrooms and schools. Studies that help advance our understanding and demonstrate effectiveness related to challenges in reading, mathematics education, and science education are especially welcome as are studies related to cognitive functions, social processes, organizational factors, and cultural features that mediate and/or moderate critical educational outcomes. On occasion, invited responses to JREE articles and rejoinders to those responses will be included in an issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信