Validation of Broadband Noise Prediction Methodology Based on Linearized Navier–Stokes Analyses

IF 1.9 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Ricardo Blázquez-Navarro, Roque Corral
{"title":"Validation of Broadband Noise Prediction Methodology Based on Linearized Navier–Stokes Analyses","authors":"Ricardo Blázquez-Navarro, Roque Corral","doi":"10.1115/1.4062398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article presents an integral validation of a synthetic turbulence broadband noise prediction methodology for fan/outlet-guide-vane (OGV) interaction. The test vehicle is the ACAT1 fan, a modern scaled-down fan, experimentally analyzed in 2018 within the TurboNoiseBB project. Three operating points, namely, Approach, Cutback, and Sideline, and two different rig configurations in terms of the axial gap between the fan and OGV are examined within this work. The methodology consists of using a Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solver to model the fan wake and the use of two-dimensional frequency domain linearized Navier–Stokes simulations to resolve the acoustics, including quasi-3D corrections to obtain representative results. The RANS results with no ad hoc tuning are compared in detail against hotwire data to determine the degree of uncertainty incurred by this kind of approach. The predicted broadband noise spectra and noise azimuthal decompositions are compared against the experimental data. The spectral levels are well predicted despite an average underprediction of around 3dB. The noise azimuthal decompositions feature a remarkable agreement with the experiment, denoting accurate modeling of the main physics governing the problem. The impact of increasing the fan/OGV axial gap is quantified numerically for the first time. It is concluded that increasing the gap is detrimental for the broadband noise footprint, unlike intuitively could be expected. Overall, the presented broadband noise methodology yields robust broadband noise predictions at an industrially feasible cost and enables a deeper understanding of the problem.","PeriodicalId":49966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Turbomachinery-Transactions of the Asme","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Turbomachinery-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4062398","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This article presents an integral validation of a synthetic turbulence broadband noise prediction methodology for fan/outlet-guide-vane (OGV) interaction. The test vehicle is the ACAT1 fan, a modern scaled-down fan, experimentally analyzed in 2018 within the TurboNoiseBB project. Three operating points, namely, Approach, Cutback, and Sideline, and two different rig configurations in terms of the axial gap between the fan and OGV are examined within this work. The methodology consists of using a Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solver to model the fan wake and the use of two-dimensional frequency domain linearized Navier–Stokes simulations to resolve the acoustics, including quasi-3D corrections to obtain representative results. The RANS results with no ad hoc tuning are compared in detail against hotwire data to determine the degree of uncertainty incurred by this kind of approach. The predicted broadband noise spectra and noise azimuthal decompositions are compared against the experimental data. The spectral levels are well predicted despite an average underprediction of around 3dB. The noise azimuthal decompositions feature a remarkable agreement with the experiment, denoting accurate modeling of the main physics governing the problem. The impact of increasing the fan/OGV axial gap is quantified numerically for the first time. It is concluded that increasing the gap is detrimental for the broadband noise footprint, unlike intuitively could be expected. Overall, the presented broadband noise methodology yields robust broadband noise predictions at an industrially feasible cost and enables a deeper understanding of the problem.
基于线性化Navier-Stokes分析的宽带噪声预测方法验证
摘要本文提出了一种用于风扇/出口-导叶(OGV)相互作用的合成湍流宽带噪声预测方法的整体验证。测试车辆是ACAT1风扇,这是一种现代缩小的风扇,于2018年在TurboNoiseBB项目中进行了实验分析。在这项工作中,研究了三个工作点,即进近、切回和副线,以及风扇和支板之间轴向间隙的两种不同钻机配置。该方法包括使用reynolds -average Navier-Stokes (RANS)求解器对风扇尾迹进行建模,并使用二维频域线性化Navier-Stokes模拟来解决声学问题,包括准3d校正以获得代表性结果。没有特别调优的RANS结果与热线数据进行了详细的比较,以确定这种方法引起的不确定性程度。预测的宽带噪声谱和噪声方位角分解与实验数据进行了比较。尽管平均低估约3dB,但光谱水平预测得很好。噪声方位角分解与实验结果非常吻合,表明对控制该问题的主要物理原理进行了准确的建模。本文首次对增大风扇/支板轴向间隙的影响进行了数值量化。结论是,增加间隙对宽带噪声足迹是有害的,不像直观地可以预期的那样。总的来说,提出的宽带噪声方法以工业上可行的成本产生了强大的宽带噪声预测,并能够更深入地了解问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
11.80%
发文量
168
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Turbomachinery publishes archival-quality, peer-reviewed technical papers that advance the state-of-the-art of turbomachinery technology related to gas turbine engines. The broad scope of the subject matter includes the fluid dynamics, heat transfer, and aeromechanics technology associated with the design, analysis, modeling, testing, and performance of turbomachinery. Emphasis is placed on gas-path technologies associated with axial compressors, centrifugal compressors, and turbines. Topics: Aerodynamic design, analysis, and test of compressor and turbine blading; Compressor stall, surge, and operability issues; Heat transfer phenomena and film cooling design, analysis, and testing in turbines; Aeromechanical instabilities; Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) applied to turbomachinery, boundary layer development, measurement techniques, and cavity and leaking flows.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信