Revisiting Audio Observations to Collect Qualitative Data During the COVID-19 Pandemic

IF 2.3 2区 文学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Nils S. Borchers, Mandy Badermann, Guido Zurstiege
{"title":"Revisiting Audio Observations to Collect Qualitative Data During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Nils S. Borchers, Mandy Badermann, Guido Zurstiege","doi":"10.1177/00027642231207074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With its physical distancing rules, the COVID-19 pandemic regulations urged researchers working in a qualitative paradigm to find pandemic-ready approaches to data collection. While many researchers turned to modern videoconferencing software, we explored an alternative route, and revisited audio observations. Audio observations replace the researcher as observer with audio recorders. Audio observations were pioneered in the 1960s, and continued to attract interest into the 1980s. Connecting with the methods literature from this earlier phase of interest, we evaluate a study design that combines audio observations with an interactive task that we applied to study active parental mediation of harmful media content. Drawing on a re-coding of data from two waves of data collection, we report on participants’ awareness of the observation episodes, issues with the recording quality, and the situational control during the observation episodes. We conclude that, although truly not a panacea, the combination of audio observations with interactive tasks not only helps to confront the challenges of physical distancing but also constitutes a serious alternative to more established qualitative data gathering approaches—even beyond pandemic restrictions. Thus, this article contributes to the extension of the methods repertoire in qualitative research.","PeriodicalId":48360,"journal":{"name":"American Behavioral Scientist","volume":" 20","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Behavioral Scientist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642231207074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With its physical distancing rules, the COVID-19 pandemic regulations urged researchers working in a qualitative paradigm to find pandemic-ready approaches to data collection. While many researchers turned to modern videoconferencing software, we explored an alternative route, and revisited audio observations. Audio observations replace the researcher as observer with audio recorders. Audio observations were pioneered in the 1960s, and continued to attract interest into the 1980s. Connecting with the methods literature from this earlier phase of interest, we evaluate a study design that combines audio observations with an interactive task that we applied to study active parental mediation of harmful media content. Drawing on a re-coding of data from two waves of data collection, we report on participants’ awareness of the observation episodes, issues with the recording quality, and the situational control during the observation episodes. We conclude that, although truly not a panacea, the combination of audio observations with interactive tasks not only helps to confront the challenges of physical distancing but also constitutes a serious alternative to more established qualitative data gathering approaches—even beyond pandemic restrictions. Thus, this article contributes to the extension of the methods repertoire in qualitative research.
在COVID-19大流行期间,重新审视音频观测以收集定性数据
COVID-19大流行法规规定了保持身体距离的规定,敦促研究人员在定性范式下工作,寻找为大流行做好准备的数据收集方法。当许多研究人员转向现代视频会议软件时,我们探索了另一条路线,并重新审视了音频观察。音频观察用音频记录器代替了研究者作为观察者的角色。音频观测是在20世纪60年代首创的,并在20世纪80年代继续引起人们的兴趣。结合这一早期研究阶段的方法文献,我们评估了一项研究设计,该研究将音频观察与互动任务相结合,我们应用该任务来研究父母对有害媒体内容的主动调解。通过对两波数据收集的数据进行重新编码,我们报告了参与者对观察事件的意识、记录质量问题以及观察事件中的情境控制。我们的结论是,尽管音频观察与互动任务的结合确实不是万灵药,但它不仅有助于应对物理距离的挑战,而且是更成熟的定性数据收集方法的重要替代方案,甚至超出了大流行的限制。因此,本文有助于扩展定性研究的方法库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: American Behavioral Scientist has been a valuable source of information for scholars, researchers, professionals, and students, providing in-depth perspectives on intriguing contemporary topics throughout the social and behavioral sciences. Each issue offers comprehensive analysis of a single topic, examining such important and diverse arenas as sociology, international and U.S. politics, behavioral sciences, communication and media, economics, education, ethnic and racial studies, terrorism, and public service. The journal"s interdisciplinary approach stimulates creativity and occasionally, controversy within the emerging frontiers of the social sciences, exploring the critical issues that affect our world and challenge our thinking.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信