Using methods of multidimensional analysis to research decision making in academic career choice

Pavlo Sereda, Kateryna Maltseva
{"title":"Using methods of multidimensional analysis to research decision making in academic career choice","authors":"Pavlo Sereda, Kateryna Maltseva","doi":"10.15407/sociology2023.03.071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The decision that students make regarding his or her further education or professional career is a complex process driven by multiple different factors. On the global scale, this research direction represents an important strategic tangent, given the significance of the universities in the formation of virtually all aspects of one’s life after graduation. It is equally crucial in the Ukrainian context, considering the educational reforms that are currently taking place in our country. As motivation to make a choice and embark on a particular career trajectory can be informed by different sources and is thus a multifactorial entity, so researching factors that affect academic career choice should accomodate multiple dimensions. To optimize the analytical procedures and to increase the informativeness of the results in our survey we employ methods of multidimensional analysis to explore and explain various aspects of decision making that can influence one’s choice of the institution for further education. To elicit the determinants of the university choice and to illustrate the effects of various factors in different domains of career choice, we use the cognitive self-report data collected from the NaUKMA undergraduates in Spring 2019. The results suggest that in students’ perception institutional characteristics of the NaUKMA, social atmosphere, academic climate and personal features of a student emerge as distinct factors. In the set of factors, the institutional characteristics were subdivided into the evaluation of the quality of the received education and strategic argument against applying for a postgraduate degree at the NaUKMA. Social atmosphere and academic climate, in their turn, split into social atmosphere, academic climate and being socially connected with individuals currently enrolled as MA students. Personal features were further subdivided into career values, attitudes toward one’s studies and attitudes towards the MA programmes. Positive evaluation of NaUKMA’s institutional characteristics has a positive correlation with one’s intentions of joining the programme and continuing one’s studies at NaUKMA, and a negative correlation with planning to apply to MA programmes abroad or elsewhere in Ukraine. Planning to avail of the international mobility programmes had a positive effect on choosing to join the MA programme at NaUKMA.","PeriodicalId":490108,"journal":{"name":"Соціологія","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Соціологія","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2023.03.071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The decision that students make regarding his or her further education or professional career is a complex process driven by multiple different factors. On the global scale, this research direction represents an important strategic tangent, given the significance of the universities in the formation of virtually all aspects of one’s life after graduation. It is equally crucial in the Ukrainian context, considering the educational reforms that are currently taking place in our country. As motivation to make a choice and embark on a particular career trajectory can be informed by different sources and is thus a multifactorial entity, so researching factors that affect academic career choice should accomodate multiple dimensions. To optimize the analytical procedures and to increase the informativeness of the results in our survey we employ methods of multidimensional analysis to explore and explain various aspects of decision making that can influence one’s choice of the institution for further education. To elicit the determinants of the university choice and to illustrate the effects of various factors in different domains of career choice, we use the cognitive self-report data collected from the NaUKMA undergraduates in Spring 2019. The results suggest that in students’ perception institutional characteristics of the NaUKMA, social atmosphere, academic climate and personal features of a student emerge as distinct factors. In the set of factors, the institutional characteristics were subdivided into the evaluation of the quality of the received education and strategic argument against applying for a postgraduate degree at the NaUKMA. Social atmosphere and academic climate, in their turn, split into social atmosphere, academic climate and being socially connected with individuals currently enrolled as MA students. Personal features were further subdivided into career values, attitudes toward one’s studies and attitudes towards the MA programmes. Positive evaluation of NaUKMA’s institutional characteristics has a positive correlation with one’s intentions of joining the programme and continuing one’s studies at NaUKMA, and a negative correlation with planning to apply to MA programmes abroad or elsewhere in Ukraine. Planning to avail of the international mobility programmes had a positive effect on choosing to join the MA programme at NaUKMA.
运用多维分析方法研究学术生涯选择中的决策
学生对自己的继续教育或职业生涯做出的决定是一个复杂的过程,受到多种不同因素的驱动。在全球范围内,这一研究方向代表了一个重要的战略切线,因为大学在一个人毕业后生活的几乎所有方面都具有重要意义。考虑到我国目前正在进行的教育改革,这在乌克兰的情况下同样至关重要。学术职业选择的动机来源不同,是一个多因素的实体,因此研究影响学术职业选择的因素应该包含多个维度。为了优化分析程序,增加调查结果的信息量,我们采用多维分析的方法来探索和解释决策的各个方面,这些方面可能会影响一个人对继续教育机构的选择。为了引出大学选择的决定因素,并说明各种因素在不同职业选择领域的影响,我们使用了2019年春季从NaUKMA本科生收集的认知自我报告数据。研究结果表明,在大学生对北师大制度特征的感知中,社会氛围、学术氛围和个人特征是显著的影响因素。在这组因素中,机构特征被细分为对所接受教育质量的评估和反对申请NaUKMA研究生学位的战略论点。社会氛围和学术氛围又分为社会氛围、学术氛围和与在读硕士生个体的社会联系。个人特征进一步细分为职业价值观、对学习的态度和对硕士课程的态度。对NaUKMA机构特征的积极评价与加入该计划并继续在NaUKMA学习的意图呈正相关,与计划申请国外或乌克兰其他地方的硕士课程呈负相关。规划利用国际流动方案对选择参加NaUKMA的硕士方案产生了积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信