Health beyond clinical protocol: institutional traps and limitations of modern medicine

Siarhei Kandrychyn
{"title":"Health beyond clinical protocol: institutional traps and limitations of modern medicine","authors":"Siarhei Kandrychyn","doi":"10.15407/sociology2023.03.090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is aimed to describe the ineffective health care mechanisms and find ways to overcome them. Some variants of institutional dysfunctions (or institutional traps) in medical practice are considered. The resort to natural methods of healing and self-healing is regarded as a way to overcome various institutional dysfunctions. The work combines several qualitative methods: a non-standardized survey of experts (doctors), included observation (25 years of work as a doctor and independent use of natural healing methods for the past 12 years), and analysis of documents, literary sources and messages on the topic of self-healing in relevant Facebook groups. The themes of the talks with doctors were health self- management and alternative healing practices (intensive physical exercises, medical fasting, and breathing exercises). During conversations with the doctors found that only some senior doctors have positive experience of using therapeutic fasting and breathing exercises (both personal and clinical), and young doctors who have been working in medicine for over 10-20 years are not familiar with these methods (\"because this treatment is not carried out according to the approved clinical protocols”, and “we treat according to modern protocols\"). The most problematic points of the use of such health practices and the reasons for their increase in society are discussed. It is concluded that both in the institutional and ideological aspect, the essential component of the public health institute should be outside the scope of official medicine, which is aimed at the use of medicinal and high-tech means of treatment and prevention.","PeriodicalId":490108,"journal":{"name":"Соціологія","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Соціологія","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/sociology2023.03.090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is aimed to describe the ineffective health care mechanisms and find ways to overcome them. Some variants of institutional dysfunctions (or institutional traps) in medical practice are considered. The resort to natural methods of healing and self-healing is regarded as a way to overcome various institutional dysfunctions. The work combines several qualitative methods: a non-standardized survey of experts (doctors), included observation (25 years of work as a doctor and independent use of natural healing methods for the past 12 years), and analysis of documents, literary sources and messages on the topic of self-healing in relevant Facebook groups. The themes of the talks with doctors were health self- management and alternative healing practices (intensive physical exercises, medical fasting, and breathing exercises). During conversations with the doctors found that only some senior doctors have positive experience of using therapeutic fasting and breathing exercises (both personal and clinical), and young doctors who have been working in medicine for over 10-20 years are not familiar with these methods ("because this treatment is not carried out according to the approved clinical protocols”, and “we treat according to modern protocols"). The most problematic points of the use of such health practices and the reasons for their increase in society are discussed. It is concluded that both in the institutional and ideological aspect, the essential component of the public health institute should be outside the scope of official medicine, which is aimed at the use of medicinal and high-tech means of treatment and prevention.
超越临床协议的健康:现代医学的制度陷阱和局限性
本文旨在描述无效的卫生保健机制,并找到克服它们的方法。医疗实践中的一些制度功能障碍(或制度陷阱)的变体被考虑。诉诸自然的治愈和自我修复的方法被认为是克服各种制度功能失调的一种方式。这项工作结合了几种定性方法:对专家(医生)的非标准化调查,包括观察(25年的医生工作和过去12年独立使用自然治疗方法),以及对相关Facebook小组中关于自我治疗主题的文件,文学来源和信息的分析。与医生会谈的主题是健康自我管理和替代治疗实践(强化体育锻炼,医疗禁食和呼吸练习)。在与医生的交谈中发现,只有一些资深医生对使用治疗性禁食和呼吸练习有积极的经验(个人和临床),而从事医学工作超过10-20年的年轻医生对这些方法不熟悉(“因为这种治疗不是根据批准的临床方案进行的”,“我们根据现代方案进行治疗”)。讨论了使用这种保健做法的最大问题及其在社会上增加的原因。结论是,在体制和意识形态方面,公共卫生机构的基本组成部分应不在官方医学的范围之内,其目的是使用医疗和高科技的治疗和预防手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信