Testing the effects of kinship, reciprocity and dominance on prosocial food provisioning in azure-winged magpies (Cyanopica cyana), carrion crows (Corvus corone) and common ravens (C. corax)

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Lisa Horn, Thomas Bugnyar, Jorg J. M. Massen
{"title":"Testing the effects of kinship, reciprocity and dominance on prosocial food provisioning in azure-winged magpies (Cyanopica cyana), carrion crows (Corvus corone) and common ravens (C. corax)","authors":"Lisa Horn,&nbsp;Thomas Bugnyar,&nbsp;Jorg J. M. Massen","doi":"10.1111/eth.13420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Prosocial behaviour (i.e. benefitting others without receiving a direct gain) has long been perceived as an evolutionary puzzle but is nevertheless relatively common among non-human animals. Prosocial food provisioning has recently been documented in several large-brained bird species, such as corvids and parrots. Yet, to date, little is known about which factors influence food provisioning in these species. Here, we investigated whether kinship, reciprocity and dominance affected food provisioning in the group service paradigm in three corvid species, namely azure-winged magpies (<i>Cyanopica cyana</i>), carrion crows (<i>Corvus corone</i>) and common ravens (<i>C. corax</i>). In this paradigm, the subjects are tested in their regular social groups and can choose to make food available to their group members by landing on a simple seesaw apparatus. We found no evidence for an effect of kinship or reciprocity on food provisioning. Contrary to our predictions, the subjects' dominance was not positively correlated with their rate of food provisioning in any species. Among ravens, dominance was instead positively correlated with receiving food. We conclude that preferential provisioning for kin and direct reciprocity might have been impeded by the provider's inability to control who receives the food in the group service paradigm, but that our findings provide another piece of evidence that dominance is a highly important factor in the social interactions of common ravens.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.13420","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.13420","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prosocial behaviour (i.e. benefitting others without receiving a direct gain) has long been perceived as an evolutionary puzzle but is nevertheless relatively common among non-human animals. Prosocial food provisioning has recently been documented in several large-brained bird species, such as corvids and parrots. Yet, to date, little is known about which factors influence food provisioning in these species. Here, we investigated whether kinship, reciprocity and dominance affected food provisioning in the group service paradigm in three corvid species, namely azure-winged magpies (Cyanopica cyana), carrion crows (Corvus corone) and common ravens (C. corax). In this paradigm, the subjects are tested in their regular social groups and can choose to make food available to their group members by landing on a simple seesaw apparatus. We found no evidence for an effect of kinship or reciprocity on food provisioning. Contrary to our predictions, the subjects' dominance was not positively correlated with their rate of food provisioning in any species. Among ravens, dominance was instead positively correlated with receiving food. We conclude that preferential provisioning for kin and direct reciprocity might have been impeded by the provider's inability to control who receives the food in the group service paradigm, but that our findings provide another piece of evidence that dominance is a highly important factor in the social interactions of common ravens.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

测试亲缘关系、互惠和支配地位对蔚蓝翅喜鹊(Cyanopica cyana)、腐食鸦(Corvus corone)和普通乌鸦(C. corax)亲社会食物供给的影响
长期以来,人们一直认为亲社会行为(即在不直接获得收益的情况下造福他人)是一个进化难题,但在非人类动物中却比较常见。最近,在几种大脑壳鸟类(如鸦片鸟和鹦鹉)中发现了亲社会的食物供给行为。然而,迄今为止,人们对影响这些物种食物供给的因素知之甚少。在这里,我们研究了亲缘关系、互惠性和优势地位是否会影响三种乌鸦(即蔚蓝翅喜鹊(Cyanopica cyana)、腐食鸦(Corvus corone)和普通乌鸦(C. corax))在群体服务范式中的食物供给。在这一范例中,受试者在其固定的社会群体中接受测试,并可以选择通过降落在一个简单的跷跷板装置上为其群体成员提供食物。我们没有发现亲缘关系或互惠对提供食物有影响。与我们的预测相反,在任何物种中,被试的优势地位与它们的食物供给率都不呈正相关。在乌鸦中,支配地位反而与接受食物呈正相关。我们的结论是,在群体服务范式中,提供者无法控制谁获得食物,这可能会妨碍为亲属优先提供食物和直接互惠,但我们的研究结果提供了另一个证据,证明支配地位是普通乌鸦社会互动中一个非常重要的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信