The Impact of Roof Material Profile and Pigmentation on the Performance of Photovoltaic Modules

Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.3390/solar3040033
Nosakhare Aigbedion, Francis Njoka, Mathew Munji
{"title":"The Impact of Roof Material Profile and Pigmentation on the Performance of Photovoltaic Modules","authors":"Nosakhare Aigbedion, Francis Njoka, Mathew Munji","doi":"10.3390/solar3040033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study combines simulations and experiments to study the heat interactions between various types of roofs and the photovoltaic (PV) modules installed on them. Specifically, the performance of PV modules on a clay roof was compared with their performance on two types of metal roofs, a Box-profile metal roof and an Orientile metal roof, which differ in shape and geometry. Additionally, this study examined the cooling potential of three common metal roof pigments, iron (iii) oxide (Fe2O3), titanium dioxide (TiO2) and basalt, on roof-installed PV modules. An unpigmented roof was also studied for comparison purposes. Model development and simulation were implemented in COMSOL Multiphysics, and the simulation results were validated and compared with field experiments. The maximum open-circuit voltages of the PV installations were found to be 21.096 V for the clay roof, 20.945 V for the Box-profile metal roof and 20.718 V for the Orientile metal roof. This study revealed that the unpigmented roof had higher solar cell temperatures compared to the pigmented models, with temperature gains ranging from 2.2 °C to 2.71 °C. Moreover, the unpigmented model displayed significantly higher surface radiosity than the pigmented models. The performance output of the modules also varied depending on the metal roof sheet shape and geometry, with the Box-profile metal roof yielding better results than the Orientile metal roof sheet. These results indicate that a specific roof pigmentation may have a small impact on a single PV module, but it can become significant in a large array of modules, especially if cooling through natural convection is hindered.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/solar3040033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study combines simulations and experiments to study the heat interactions between various types of roofs and the photovoltaic (PV) modules installed on them. Specifically, the performance of PV modules on a clay roof was compared with their performance on two types of metal roofs, a Box-profile metal roof and an Orientile metal roof, which differ in shape and geometry. Additionally, this study examined the cooling potential of three common metal roof pigments, iron (iii) oxide (Fe2O3), titanium dioxide (TiO2) and basalt, on roof-installed PV modules. An unpigmented roof was also studied for comparison purposes. Model development and simulation were implemented in COMSOL Multiphysics, and the simulation results were validated and compared with field experiments. The maximum open-circuit voltages of the PV installations were found to be 21.096 V for the clay roof, 20.945 V for the Box-profile metal roof and 20.718 V for the Orientile metal roof. This study revealed that the unpigmented roof had higher solar cell temperatures compared to the pigmented models, with temperature gains ranging from 2.2 °C to 2.71 °C. Moreover, the unpigmented model displayed significantly higher surface radiosity than the pigmented models. The performance output of the modules also varied depending on the metal roof sheet shape and geometry, with the Box-profile metal roof yielding better results than the Orientile metal roof sheet. These results indicate that a specific roof pigmentation may have a small impact on a single PV module, but it can become significant in a large array of modules, especially if cooling through natural convection is hindered.
分享
查看原文
屋顶材料轮廓和色素沉着对光伏组件性能的影响
本研究将模拟与实验相结合,研究不同类型屋顶与安装在屋顶上的光伏组件之间的热相互作用。具体来说,光伏组件在粘土屋顶上的性能与在两种不同形状和几何形状的金属屋顶上的性能进行了比较,这两种金属屋顶分别是Box-profile金属屋顶和orienttile金属屋顶。此外,本研究还研究了三种常见的金属屋顶颜料,氧化铁(Fe2O3)、二氧化钛(TiO2)和玄武岩在屋顶安装的光伏组件上的冷却潜力。为了进行比较,还研究了一个未着色的屋顶。在COMSOL Multiphysics中进行了模型开发和仿真,并将仿真结果与现场实验结果进行了验证和比较。粘土屋顶光伏装置的最大开路电压为21.096 V,箱形金属屋顶为20.945 V,东方金属屋顶为20.718 V。该研究表明,与着色模型相比,未着色屋顶的太阳能电池温度更高,温度增益范围为2.2°C至2.71°C。此外,未着色模型的表面辐射度明显高于着色模型。模块的性能输出也取决于金属屋顶板的形状和几何形状,Box-profile金属屋顶比Orientile金属屋顶板产生更好的效果。这些结果表明,特定的屋顶色素沉积对单个光伏组件的影响可能很小,但对大量组件的影响可能很大,特别是在自然对流冷却受到阻碍的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信