A New Model for Determining Factors Affecting Human Errors in Manual Assembly Processes Using Fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL Methods

IF 2.2 3区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Symmetry-Basel Pub Date : 2023-10-24 DOI:10.3390/sym15111967
Fahad M. Alqahtani, Mohammed A. Noman, Saad A. Alabdulkarim, Ibrahim Alharkan, Mohammed H. Alhaag, Faisal M. Alessa
{"title":"A New Model for Determining Factors Affecting Human Errors in Manual Assembly Processes Using Fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL Methods","authors":"Fahad M. Alqahtani, Mohammed A. Noman, Saad A. Alabdulkarim, Ibrahim Alharkan, Mohammed H. Alhaag, Faisal M. Alessa","doi":"10.3390/sym15111967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human errors (HEs) are common problems in manual assembly processes, impacting product quality and resulting in additional costs. Based on expert judgments, this study aims to identify the most significant factors affecting HEs in manual assembly processes and explore the cause-and-effect relationships among those factors. In order to achieve this objective, a proposed model is constructed using two types of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques. Firstly, using two rounds of the fuzzy Delphi method (FDM), twenty-seven factors with an influence score of 0.7 or higher were found to have a major impact on HEs during manual assembly processes, with at least a 75% consensus among experts. After that, the twenty-seven factors affecting HEs were given to experts in a third round to analyze the cause-and-effect relationships among those factors using the fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method. In MCDM techniques, symmetry refers to an important property that can be used to find relationships between variables. It is based on the principle that the relative importance or preference between two variables should remain the same regardless of their positions or roles. Therefore, symmetry is a factor that MCDM approaches take into account to ensure that the relationships between variables are accurately represented, leading to more reliable decision-making outcomes. The reliability and normality of the surveying data were examined using the SPSS 22.0 software program. The study results revealed that training level, poor workplace layout, a lack of necessary tools, and experience were the major factors affecting HEs as root causes. Moreover, a failure to address the error-causing problem, unintentional unsafe acts, fatigue, and poor error visual perception were found to be effect (dependent) factors. The findings of this study can help organizations make better-informed decisions on how to reduce worker errors and interest in the factors that contribute to assembly errors and provide a good basis for reaching the quality of final assembled parts.","PeriodicalId":48874,"journal":{"name":"Symmetry-Basel","volume":"49 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symmetry-Basel","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/sym15111967","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human errors (HEs) are common problems in manual assembly processes, impacting product quality and resulting in additional costs. Based on expert judgments, this study aims to identify the most significant factors affecting HEs in manual assembly processes and explore the cause-and-effect relationships among those factors. In order to achieve this objective, a proposed model is constructed using two types of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques. Firstly, using two rounds of the fuzzy Delphi method (FDM), twenty-seven factors with an influence score of 0.7 or higher were found to have a major impact on HEs during manual assembly processes, with at least a 75% consensus among experts. After that, the twenty-seven factors affecting HEs were given to experts in a third round to analyze the cause-and-effect relationships among those factors using the fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method. In MCDM techniques, symmetry refers to an important property that can be used to find relationships between variables. It is based on the principle that the relative importance or preference between two variables should remain the same regardless of their positions or roles. Therefore, symmetry is a factor that MCDM approaches take into account to ensure that the relationships between variables are accurately represented, leading to more reliable decision-making outcomes. The reliability and normality of the surveying data were examined using the SPSS 22.0 software program. The study results revealed that training level, poor workplace layout, a lack of necessary tools, and experience were the major factors affecting HEs as root causes. Moreover, a failure to address the error-causing problem, unintentional unsafe acts, fatigue, and poor error visual perception were found to be effect (dependent) factors. The findings of this study can help organizations make better-informed decisions on how to reduce worker errors and interest in the factors that contribute to assembly errors and provide a good basis for reaching the quality of final assembled parts.
用模糊德尔菲和DEMATEL方法确定人工装配过程中人为错误影响因素的新模型
人为错误(HEs)是人工组装过程中的常见问题,会影响产品质量并导致额外的成本。在专家判断的基础上,本研究旨在找出影响手工装配过程HEs的最显著因素,并探讨这些因素之间的因果关系。为了实现这一目标,采用两种多准则决策(MCDM)技术构建了一个模型。首先,采用两轮模糊德尔菲法(FDM),发现27个影响得分在0.7及以上的因素对人工装配过程中的HEs有重大影响,专家的共识度至少为75%。然后,第三轮将27个影响HEs的因素交给专家,采用模糊决策试验与评价实验室(DEMATEL)方法分析各因素之间的因果关系。在MCDM技术中,对称性是一种重要的属性,可以用来发现变量之间的关系。它所依据的原则是,无论两个变量的位置或作用如何,它们之间的相对重要性或偏好应该保持不变。因此,对称性是MCDM方法考虑的一个因素,以确保变量之间的关系得到准确表示,从而产生更可靠的决策结果。采用SPSS 22.0软件对调查数据的信度和正态性进行检验。研究结果显示,培训水平、工作场所布局不良、缺乏必要的工具和经验是影响医疗服务人员的主要因素。此外,未能解决导致错误的问题,无意的不安全行为,疲劳和错误视觉感知差被发现是影响(依赖)因素。本研究的结果可以帮助组织在如何减少工人错误和对导致装配错误的因素的兴趣方面做出更明智的决策,并为达到最终装配零件的质量提供良好的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Symmetry-Basel
Symmetry-Basel MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
2276
审稿时长
14.88 days
期刊介绍: Symmetry (ISSN 2073-8994), an international and interdisciplinary scientific journal, publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided, so that results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信