Politik Hukum Pembuktian dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen di Indonesia

Misnar Syam
{"title":"Politik Hukum Pembuktian dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen di Indonesia","authors":"Misnar Syam","doi":"10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Guidelines (GBHN) of Indonesia, including through the Decree of the People's Consultative Assembly (TAP MPR) No. II of 1988. Consumer protection is regulated by Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. Repressive protection is an effort to restore the losses suffered by consumers. In any consumer dispute resolution process, evidence is required. Under the Consumer Protection Law (UUPK), the burden of proof is shifted, as stipulated in Articles 19, 22, 23, and 28, where the burden of proof falls on the business entity obligated to prove its innocence. Evidence in civil procedure law is regulated in Article 163 of the HIR/283 RBg, following the ordinary burden of proof. This leads to a lack of harmony in the regulations, which can result in confusion and legal uncertainty in its implementation. This can hinder the achievement of the goals of consumer protection. Legal policy is the direction of future legal regulations, so when making laws, it is necessary to refer to Indonesia's legal policy. Based on the above reasons, the research problem in this study is how evidence is handled in the resolution of consumer disputes from the perspective of Indonesian legal policy. The research method used is normative. In conclusion, in the legal policy of consumer protection, especially in the dispute resolution process, there is a need for harmonization between the Consumer Protection Law (UUPK) and future civil procedural law to ensure legal certainty.","PeriodicalId":193737,"journal":{"name":"UNES Law Review","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNES Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Guidelines (GBHN) of Indonesia, including through the Decree of the People's Consultative Assembly (TAP MPR) No. II of 1988. Consumer protection is regulated by Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. Repressive protection is an effort to restore the losses suffered by consumers. In any consumer dispute resolution process, evidence is required. Under the Consumer Protection Law (UUPK), the burden of proof is shifted, as stipulated in Articles 19, 22, 23, and 28, where the burden of proof falls on the business entity obligated to prove its innocence. Evidence in civil procedure law is regulated in Article 163 of the HIR/283 RBg, following the ordinary burden of proof. This leads to a lack of harmony in the regulations, which can result in confusion and legal uncertainty in its implementation. This can hinder the achievement of the goals of consumer protection. Legal policy is the direction of future legal regulations, so when making laws, it is necessary to refer to Indonesia's legal policy. Based on the above reasons, the research problem in this study is how evidence is handled in the resolution of consumer disputes from the perspective of Indonesian legal policy. The research method used is normative. In conclusion, in the legal policy of consumer protection, especially in the dispute resolution process, there is a need for harmonization between the Consumer Protection Law (UUPK) and future civil procedural law to ensure legal certainty.
印尼消费者纠纷解决的政治法律证明
印度尼西亚准则(GBHN),包括通过人民协商会议法令(TAP MPR)。1988年第2号决议。关于消费者保护的1999年第8号法律对消费者保护进行了规定。压制性保护是为了恢复消费者遭受的损失。在任何消费者纠纷解决过程中,都需要证据。《消费者保护法》第19条、第22条、第23条、第28条规定的举证责任转移到有义务证明自己无罪的企业身上。继普通举证责任之后,民事诉讼法中的证据在HIR/283 RBg第163条中进行了规定。这就导致了规章制度的不和谐,从而在实施过程中造成混乱和法律上的不确定性。这可能会阻碍实现保护消费者的目标。法律政策是未来法律规制的方向,因此在制定法律时,有必要参考印尼的法律政策。基于以上原因,本研究的研究问题是从印尼法律政策的角度来看,消费者纠纷解决中的证据是如何处理的。使用的研究方法是规范的。综上所述,在消费者保护的法律政策中,特别是在纠纷解决过程中,需要在《消费者保护法》和未来的民事诉讼法之间进行协调,以确保法律的确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信