Methodology for Assessing the Digital Transformation of Libraries

Andrey I. Kapterev
{"title":"Methodology for Assessing the Digital Transformation of Libraries","authors":"Andrey I. Kapterev","doi":"10.25281/0869-608x-2023-72-4-295-309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the paucity of comprehensive studies in the field of library digitalization, a brief description of the methodology for assessing the digital transformation (DT) of libraries is presented. The problem is considered according to various components. Domestic and foreign approaches to the study of the level of DT are described. The stages of assessing the level of digital maturity of libraries (analysis of the socio-professional background of digital maturity, functional benchmarking of digital maturity of specific libraries, intellectual data analysis and replication of best practices, data-driven sectoral management with the use of artificial intelligence and revision of regulations) are substantiated. The levels of digital maturity of libraries (readiness for DT, activity of DT, innovativeness of DT) have been defined. The aim of the study is to develop a methodology for comprehensive assessment of libraries’ digital maturity at the general and corporate levels, and to propose tools for assessing the level of digital maturity of specific libraries. Recommendations for processing the results obtained using modern software and hardware tools are given. For the first time a formula for quantitative assessment of digital maturity of libraries using indices is proposed. The presented variant of the matrix for assessing digital maturity of technological processes includes the main library processes as components of digital maturity and expands the understanding of functional benchmarking aimed at comparing the results of digital maturity of specific libraries. Based on the study, the following conclusions are drawn. 1. To manage DT, it is necessary to organize continuous monitoring of digital maturity of libraries, i.e. their readiness for DT, activity of DT, innovativeness of DT expressed in criteria and indicators agreed with the professional community. 2. The results of monitoring should become an important component of management decision-making based on digital data (data-driven approach) and forecasting of both positive and negative trends as a result of intelligent data analysis. 3. The analysis of the digital maturity level of libraries will make it possible to create appropriate rankings, as well as dashboards (interactive visualisation dashboards), which have increased visibility, decision-making power and motivate libraries to achieve goals in DT.","PeriodicalId":484744,"journal":{"name":"Библиотековедение","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Библиотековедение","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25281/0869-608x-2023-72-4-295-309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the paucity of comprehensive studies in the field of library digitalization, a brief description of the methodology for assessing the digital transformation (DT) of libraries is presented. The problem is considered according to various components. Domestic and foreign approaches to the study of the level of DT are described. The stages of assessing the level of digital maturity of libraries (analysis of the socio-professional background of digital maturity, functional benchmarking of digital maturity of specific libraries, intellectual data analysis and replication of best practices, data-driven sectoral management with the use of artificial intelligence and revision of regulations) are substantiated. The levels of digital maturity of libraries (readiness for DT, activity of DT, innovativeness of DT) have been defined. The aim of the study is to develop a methodology for comprehensive assessment of libraries’ digital maturity at the general and corporate levels, and to propose tools for assessing the level of digital maturity of specific libraries. Recommendations for processing the results obtained using modern software and hardware tools are given. For the first time a formula for quantitative assessment of digital maturity of libraries using indices is proposed. The presented variant of the matrix for assessing digital maturity of technological processes includes the main library processes as components of digital maturity and expands the understanding of functional benchmarking aimed at comparing the results of digital maturity of specific libraries. Based on the study, the following conclusions are drawn. 1. To manage DT, it is necessary to organize continuous monitoring of digital maturity of libraries, i.e. their readiness for DT, activity of DT, innovativeness of DT expressed in criteria and indicators agreed with the professional community. 2. The results of monitoring should become an important component of management decision-making based on digital data (data-driven approach) and forecasting of both positive and negative trends as a result of intelligent data analysis. 3. The analysis of the digital maturity level of libraries will make it possible to create appropriate rankings, as well as dashboards (interactive visualisation dashboards), which have increased visibility, decision-making power and motivate libraries to achieve goals in DT.
评估图书馆数字化转型的方法论
由于缺乏对图书馆数字化领域的全面研究,本文简要介绍了评估图书馆数字化转型的方法。这个问题是根据各个组成部分来考虑的。介绍了国内外研究DT水平的方法。评估图书馆数字成熟度水平的阶段(分析数字成熟度的社会专业背景,特定图书馆数字成熟度的功能基准,智能数据分析和最佳实践的复制,使用人工智能的数据驱动部门管理和修订法规)得到证实。定义了图书馆的数字成熟度水平(数字数据挖掘的准备程度、数字数据挖掘的活跃程度、数字数据挖掘的创新性)。本研究的目的是开发一种综合评估一般和公司层面图书馆数字化成熟度的方法,并提出评估特定图书馆数字化成熟度的工具。给出了使用现代软件和硬件工具处理所得结果的建议。首次提出了利用指标定量评价图书馆数字化成熟度的公式。所提出的用于评估技术流程数字成熟度的矩阵变体包括作为数字成熟度组成部分的主要图书馆流程,并扩展了对旨在比较特定图书馆数字成熟度结果的功能基准的理解。基于研究,得出以下结论。1. 为了管理DT,需要组织对图书馆数字化成熟度的持续监测,即图书馆对DT的准备程度、DT的活跃程度、DT的创新程度,这些创新表现在与专业团体一致的标准和指标上。2. 监测结果应成为基于数字数据(数据驱动方法)的管理决策的重要组成部分,并作为智能数据分析的结果预测积极和消极趋势。3.对图书馆数字成熟度水平的分析将使创建适当的排名以及仪表板(交互式可视化仪表板)成为可能,这增加了可见性,决策能力并激励图书馆实现数字化发展的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信