COVID-19 vaccine in liver transplant recipients

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hinpetch Daungsupawong, Viroj Wiwanitkit
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccine in liver transplant recipients","authors":"Hinpetch Daungsupawong,&nbsp;Viroj Wiwanitkit","doi":"10.1002/ags3.12747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dear Editor,</p><p>We would like to share ideas on the publication “Antibody titer after administration of mRNA-based vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in liver transplant recipients.”<span><sup>1</sup></span> The researchers wanted to look at antibody levels in liver transplant recipients who had received vaccinations against spike and nucleocapsid proteins. There were 125 liver transplant recipients and 20 healthy volunteers in the study. After the second, third, and fourth vaccine doses, antibody levels were tested. According to the findings, 89.1% of liver transplant recipients had a favorable humoral response after the second dose, which increased to 100% after the third dose. However, anti-spike antibody levels were significantly lower after 3 and 6 months compared to 1 month after the second treatment. Anti-spike antibodies were considerably increased in both liver transplant recipients and healthy controls after receiving a booster immunization. Antibody degradation rates were comparable between transplant recipients and controls. Only 4.0% of transplant patients were immunized.</p><p>While the study sheds light on the humoral response to vaccination in liver transplant recipients, it is vital to assess the technique and consider potential limitations. The study is restricted to a specific cohort of liver transplant patients and does not include an unvaccinated transplant recipient control group. This makes determining the baseline humoral response and comparing it to the reaction after vaccination difficult. Furthermore, while the study focuses on antibody levels as a marker of immunological response, it does not examine other components of immune protection, such as cellular immune responses or the presence of memory B and T cells. These elements are critical in determining the overall efficacy of vaccination. Furthermore, the trial provides no data on clinical outcomes or the efficacy of vaccination in reducing COVID-19 infection or severe disease in liver transplant recipients. In this susceptible population, it is critical to assess the influence of vaccination on reducing the risk of infection and its associated sequelae.</p><p>These factors might alter how COVID-19 infection and vaccination behave, altering the vaccine's previously established scientific efficacy. It's possible that previous asymptomatic COVID-19 infections influenced the results. Genetic make-up may also have an impact on the response.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Evaluation of the vaccine's long-term effectiveness in preventing COVID-19 in people may be difficult due to the lack of a clear follow-up time in the experiment. Comorbidities, socioeconomic position, and accessibility to healthcare are examples of potential confounding variables that may have affected the findings but were not explored in this study.</p><p>None.</p><p>Approval of the research protocol: N/A.</p><p>Informed Consent: N/A.</p><p>Registry and the Registration No. of the study/Trial: N/A.</p><p>Animal Studies: N/A.</p><p>HD 50% ideas, writing, analyzing, approval. VW 50% ideas, supervision, approval.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest for this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":"8 2","pages":"365-366"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ags3.12747","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ags3.12747","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dear Editor,

We would like to share ideas on the publication “Antibody titer after administration of mRNA-based vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in liver transplant recipients.”1 The researchers wanted to look at antibody levels in liver transplant recipients who had received vaccinations against spike and nucleocapsid proteins. There were 125 liver transplant recipients and 20 healthy volunteers in the study. After the second, third, and fourth vaccine doses, antibody levels were tested. According to the findings, 89.1% of liver transplant recipients had a favorable humoral response after the second dose, which increased to 100% after the third dose. However, anti-spike antibody levels were significantly lower after 3 and 6 months compared to 1 month after the second treatment. Anti-spike antibodies were considerably increased in both liver transplant recipients and healthy controls after receiving a booster immunization. Antibody degradation rates were comparable between transplant recipients and controls. Only 4.0% of transplant patients were immunized.

While the study sheds light on the humoral response to vaccination in liver transplant recipients, it is vital to assess the technique and consider potential limitations. The study is restricted to a specific cohort of liver transplant patients and does not include an unvaccinated transplant recipient control group. This makes determining the baseline humoral response and comparing it to the reaction after vaccination difficult. Furthermore, while the study focuses on antibody levels as a marker of immunological response, it does not examine other components of immune protection, such as cellular immune responses or the presence of memory B and T cells. These elements are critical in determining the overall efficacy of vaccination. Furthermore, the trial provides no data on clinical outcomes or the efficacy of vaccination in reducing COVID-19 infection or severe disease in liver transplant recipients. In this susceptible population, it is critical to assess the influence of vaccination on reducing the risk of infection and its associated sequelae.

These factors might alter how COVID-19 infection and vaccination behave, altering the vaccine's previously established scientific efficacy. It's possible that previous asymptomatic COVID-19 infections influenced the results. Genetic make-up may also have an impact on the response.2 Evaluation of the vaccine's long-term effectiveness in preventing COVID-19 in people may be difficult due to the lack of a clear follow-up time in the experiment. Comorbidities, socioeconomic position, and accessibility to healthcare are examples of potential confounding variables that may have affected the findings but were not explored in this study.

None.

Approval of the research protocol: N/A.

Informed Consent: N/A.

Registry and the Registration No. of the study/Trial: N/A.

Animal Studies: N/A.

HD 50% ideas, writing, analyzing, approval. VW 50% ideas, supervision, approval.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest for this article.

肝移植受者接种 COVID-19 疫苗
亲爱的编辑,我们想就 "肝移植受者接种基于 mRNA 的严重急性呼吸道综合征冠状病毒 2 疫苗后的抗体滴度 "1 一文谈谈自己的看法。共有 125 名肝移植受者和 20 名健康志愿者参与了这项研究。在接种第二、第三和第四剂疫苗后,对抗体水平进行了检测。研究结果显示,89.1%的肝移植受者在第二剂疫苗接种后产生了良好的体液反应,第三剂疫苗接种后这一比例上升到100%。然而,与第二次治疗后一个月相比,3个月和6个月后的抗尖峰抗体水平明显降低。接受加强免疫后,肝移植受者和健康对照组的抗尖峰抗体水平都有显著提高。移植受者和对照组的抗体降解率相当。虽然该研究揭示了肝移植受者对疫苗接种的体液反应,但对该技术进行评估并考虑潜在的局限性至关重要。该研究仅限于特定的肝移植患者群体,不包括未接种疫苗的移植受者对照组。这就很难确定基线体液反应并将其与接种疫苗后的反应进行比较。此外,虽然该研究侧重于将抗体水平作为免疫反应的标志,但并没有检查免疫保护的其他组成部分,如细胞免疫反应或记忆 B 细胞和 T 细胞的存在。这些因素对于确定疫苗接种的整体效果至关重要。此外,该试验没有提供有关临床结果或疫苗接种对减少肝移植受者 COVID-19 感染或严重疾病的疗效的数据。在这一易感人群中,评估疫苗接种对降低感染风险及其相关后遗症的影响至关重要。这些因素可能会改变 COVID-19 感染和疫苗接种的行为方式,从而改变疫苗之前已确立的科学疗效。以前无症状的COVID-19感染可能会影响结果。2 由于实验缺乏明确的随访时间,因此很难评估疫苗在预防 COVID-19 方面的长期有效性。合并症、社会经济地位和医疗保健的可及性等潜在混杂变量可能会影响研究结果,但本研究未对此进行探讨:不适用。知情同意书:不适用:研究/试验的注册机构和注册号:不详:动物研究HD:50%构思、撰写、分析、批准。作者声明本文无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信