Behavior of Steel Fiber Concrete Beams with Different Reinforcement Method Around Opening

Mona M. Fawzy, Magdy Yousef, Samir M. Ahmed
{"title":"Behavior of Steel Fiber Concrete Beams with Different Reinforcement Method Around Opening","authors":"Mona M. Fawzy, Magdy Yousef, Samir M. Ahmed","doi":"10.21608/erj.2023.315719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Openings in concrete beams is preferred than using extended dropped ceilings to accommodate utility ducts and pipes. This leads to significant cost saving but unfortunately, beam strength and serviceability are affected. Experimental study of behavior of steel fiber concrete beams with different reinforcement methods around opening by using external glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) or internal additional steel bars in addition to opening size is conducted. Load deflection curves and load strain curves are discussed. Beam dimensions studied are scaled to half their actual dimensions where the studied dimensions are common in beams. The authors only choose one size for all models to make it easy to compare the results. Other dimensions should be studied in the future. The only two specimens with openings that maintain ductile behavior are when adding steel fibers to concrete not containing GFRP and adding GFRP around the opening in concrete without steel fibers. When comparing a specimen with same opening dimension to another containing steel fibers without GFRP, the usage of steel fibers increases ultimate load (P u ) by 24% and deflection (∆ u ) by 69% with elastic plastic behavior and initial stiffness (I.S) increases by 17%, post cracking stiffness (P.I) decrease by 24% and energy absorption (E.A) increase by two times. On the other hand, GFRP is used in beam specimen that doesn’t contain steel fibers in the concrete mixture, P u increases by 42% and ∆u increases by 88%.","PeriodicalId":161226,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Research Journal","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/erj.2023.315719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Openings in concrete beams is preferred than using extended dropped ceilings to accommodate utility ducts and pipes. This leads to significant cost saving but unfortunately, beam strength and serviceability are affected. Experimental study of behavior of steel fiber concrete beams with different reinforcement methods around opening by using external glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) or internal additional steel bars in addition to opening size is conducted. Load deflection curves and load strain curves are discussed. Beam dimensions studied are scaled to half their actual dimensions where the studied dimensions are common in beams. The authors only choose one size for all models to make it easy to compare the results. Other dimensions should be studied in the future. The only two specimens with openings that maintain ductile behavior are when adding steel fibers to concrete not containing GFRP and adding GFRP around the opening in concrete without steel fibers. When comparing a specimen with same opening dimension to another containing steel fibers without GFRP, the usage of steel fibers increases ultimate load (P u ) by 24% and deflection (∆ u ) by 69% with elastic plastic behavior and initial stiffness (I.S) increases by 17%, post cracking stiffness (P.I) decrease by 24% and energy absorption (E.A) increase by two times. On the other hand, GFRP is used in beam specimen that doesn’t contain steel fibers in the concrete mixture, P u increases by 42% and ∆u increases by 88%.
不同配筋方式的钢纤维混凝土梁开孔周边性能研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信