Opening new brokerage opportunities while closing existing ones: The Tertius Iungens orientation as a source of network advantage

IF 6.2 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Olli-Pekka Kauppila, Lorenzo Bizzi, David Obstfeld
{"title":"Opening new brokerage opportunities while closing existing ones: The Tertius Iungens orientation as a source of network advantage","authors":"Olli-Pekka Kauppila,&nbsp;Lorenzo Bizzi,&nbsp;David Obstfeld","doi":"10.1002/job.2753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Organizational members face a motivational dilemma in influencing the social relationships of others: The organization benefits from high connectedness among employees, but personal advantages accrue to those who occupy brokerage positions between disconnected others. In this study, we draw on the organizational paradox perspective to argue that the reconciliation of these contrasting objectives lies in recognizing one's agency to facilitate connectedness (<i>closing</i>) within a social structure and the search for new connections (<i>opening</i>) as mutually supportive. Across two field studies, we examine how individuals' advantageous position in an organizational network emerges from the interplay between a <i>tertius iungens</i> orientation to join others in collaboration and network building to open new brokering opportunities. In Study 1, analyses of a sample of two-wave, cross-lagged panel data show that a <i>tertius iungens</i> orientation contributes to the number of outgoing ties to other actors via network building. Study 2 uses a network survey to add that a <i>tertius iungens</i> orientation is positively associated with incoming ties from others and network brokerage, and again, these relationships are mediated by network building. Overall, our results indicate that by increasing connectedness in their organizational social network, individuals simultaneously activate opening behaviors that facilitate the expansion of their network, thereby revitalizing their structurally advantageous position.</p>","PeriodicalId":48450,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","volume":"45 1","pages":"21-38"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/job.2753","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.2753","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Organizational members face a motivational dilemma in influencing the social relationships of others: The organization benefits from high connectedness among employees, but personal advantages accrue to those who occupy brokerage positions between disconnected others. In this study, we draw on the organizational paradox perspective to argue that the reconciliation of these contrasting objectives lies in recognizing one's agency to facilitate connectedness (closing) within a social structure and the search for new connections (opening) as mutually supportive. Across two field studies, we examine how individuals' advantageous position in an organizational network emerges from the interplay between a tertius iungens orientation to join others in collaboration and network building to open new brokering opportunities. In Study 1, analyses of a sample of two-wave, cross-lagged panel data show that a tertius iungens orientation contributes to the number of outgoing ties to other actors via network building. Study 2 uses a network survey to add that a tertius iungens orientation is positively associated with incoming ties from others and network brokerage, and again, these relationships are mediated by network building. Overall, our results indicate that by increasing connectedness in their organizational social network, individuals simultaneously activate opening behaviors that facilitate the expansion of their network, thereby revitalizing their structurally advantageous position.

Abstract Image

打开新的经纪机会,同时关闭现有机会:作为网络优势源泉的特尔提乌斯-荣根斯导向
组织成员在影响他人社会关系的过程中面临着动机困境:组织会从员工之间的高度联系中获益,但个人优势则会归于那些在断开联系的其他人之间占据中介位置的人。在本研究中,我们借鉴了组织悖论的观点,认为要调和这些截然相反的目标,就必须认识到自己在社会结构中促进联系(关闭)和寻求新联系(打开)的作用是相辅相成的。在两项实地研究中,我们考察了个人在组织网络中的优势地位是如何从加入他人合作的第三性导向与建立网络以开辟新的中介机会之间的相互作用中产生的。在研究 1 中,对两波交叉滞后面板数据样本的分析表明,"第三 "取向有助于通过网络建设与其他参与者建立外向联系。研究 2 利用网络调查补充说明,"第三人 "取向与来自他人的联系和网络中介呈正相关,而且这些关系也是通过网络建设促成的。总之,我们的研究结果表明,通过增加组织社会网络中的联系,个体同时激活了促进其网络扩展的开放行为,从而重振其结构优势地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: The Journal of Organizational Behavior aims to publish empirical reports and theoretical reviews of research in the field of organizational behavior, wherever in the world that work is conducted. The journal will focus on research and theory in all topics associated with organizational behavior within and across individual, group and organizational levels of analysis, including: -At the individual level: personality, perception, beliefs, attitudes, values, motivation, career behavior, stress, emotions, judgment, and commitment. -At the group level: size, composition, structure, leadership, power, group affect, and politics. -At the organizational level: structure, change, goal-setting, creativity, and human resource management policies and practices. -Across levels: decision-making, performance, job satisfaction, turnover and absenteeism, diversity, careers and career development, equal opportunities, work-life balance, identification, organizational culture and climate, inter-organizational processes, and multi-national and cross-national issues. -Research methodologies in studies of organizational behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信