Identifying and Assessing Perceived Cycling Safety Components

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Safety Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.3390/safety9040075
Michelle Duren, Bryce Corrigan, Ryan David Kennedy, Keshia M. Pollack Porter, Johnathon Ehsani
{"title":"Identifying and Assessing Perceived Cycling Safety Components","authors":"Michelle Duren, Bryce Corrigan, Ryan David Kennedy, Keshia M. Pollack Porter, Johnathon Ehsani","doi":"10.3390/safety9040075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perceived safety is recognized throughout the mode choice literature as a key barrier to cycling, yet its constructs are poorly understood. Although commonly understood to relate to crash and injury risk and sometimes vulnerability to crime, health impact assessments identify numerous other pathways through which cycling can negatively impact health. This study leverages a nationally representative survey of U.S. adults in 2022 to assess a set of eleven factors as potential components of perceived cycling safety. We use principal component analysis to identify components of perceived cycling safety and then employ principal component regression to assess these components in relation to predicting unsafe cycling perception. We identify five key dimensions of perceived safety. Specifically, we found that perceived bicycling safety can be encompassed in the following components: (1) contaminant exposure, (2) injurious collision risk, (3) street conditions, (4) weather conditions, and (5) crime risk. In evaluating each identified component, we found that injurious collision risk and street conditions were the most predictive of considering cycling as unsafe. We further develop an understanding of how differences in cycling behavior, such as using cycling for commuting purposes, may contribute to differences in how cycling safety components coalesce into perceived safety.","PeriodicalId":36827,"journal":{"name":"Safety","volume":"50 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/safety9040075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perceived safety is recognized throughout the mode choice literature as a key barrier to cycling, yet its constructs are poorly understood. Although commonly understood to relate to crash and injury risk and sometimes vulnerability to crime, health impact assessments identify numerous other pathways through which cycling can negatively impact health. This study leverages a nationally representative survey of U.S. adults in 2022 to assess a set of eleven factors as potential components of perceived cycling safety. We use principal component analysis to identify components of perceived cycling safety and then employ principal component regression to assess these components in relation to predicting unsafe cycling perception. We identify five key dimensions of perceived safety. Specifically, we found that perceived bicycling safety can be encompassed in the following components: (1) contaminant exposure, (2) injurious collision risk, (3) street conditions, (4) weather conditions, and (5) crime risk. In evaluating each identified component, we found that injurious collision risk and street conditions were the most predictive of considering cycling as unsafe. We further develop an understanding of how differences in cycling behavior, such as using cycling for commuting purposes, may contribute to differences in how cycling safety components coalesce into perceived safety.
识别和评估感知自行车安全组件
感知安全性在整个模式选择文献中被认为是骑车的关键障碍,但其结构却知之甚少。虽然人们普遍认为骑车与撞车和受伤风险有关,有时还容易受到犯罪的伤害,但健康影响评估发现,骑车可以通过许多其他途径对健康产生负面影响。这项研究利用了2022年对美国成年人进行的一项具有全国代表性的调查,以评估11个因素作为感知骑自行车安全的潜在组成部分。我们使用主成分分析来识别感知骑车安全的成分,然后使用主成分回归来评估这些成分与预测不安全骑车感知的关系。我们确定了感知安全的五个关键维度。具体而言,我们发现感知自行车安全可以包含以下组成部分:(1)污染物暴露,(2)伤害碰撞风险,(3)街道状况,(4)天气状况,以及(5)犯罪风险。在评估每一个确定的组成部分时,我们发现伤害性碰撞风险和街道状况是认为骑自行车不安全的最具预测性的因素。我们进一步了解了骑自行车行为的差异,例如以通勤为目的骑自行车,可能会导致骑自行车安全成分如何融合成感知安全的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Safety
Safety Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
71
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信