Exploring the pathway of academic entrepreneurs: The case of Stellenbosch University

Lee-Ann Louwrens, Goosain Solomon, Inger B. Pettersen
{"title":"Exploring the pathway of academic entrepreneurs: The case of Stellenbosch University","authors":"Lee-Ann Louwrens, Goosain Solomon, Inger B. Pettersen","doi":"10.4102/sajesbm.v15i1.680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Universities globally face challenges of becoming entrepreneurial, delivering third mission activities, including the support of academic entrepreneurship. Abundant research exists on academic entrepreneurs in the United Sates (USA) and Europe. Limited research exists on understanding pathways of academic entrepreneurship in South African Universities.Aim: The aim was to critically review the pathway of research commercialisation of academics at a research-intensive university.Setting: This single case study focuses on one research-intensive university; a pioneer in the field of academic entrepreneurship in South Africa.Methods: A qualitative research approach following a single-case study design was selected to investigate a phenomenon within its natural setting, using purposeful sampling and semi-structured interviews. The data were thematically analysed.Results: The nature of research outputs takes a hybrid form, the awareness of the commercialisation of research is ineffectively communicated, supporting mechanisms Technology Transfer Office (TTO) are in place, factors hampering research commercialisation include time constraints and academics’ willingness to partner with the university.Conclusion: Context is bi-modal, meaning the institution is orientated towards basic research, Mode 1, while there is a transition of the research culture towards commercialisation of research, Mode 2, contributing to ineffective communication within the institution. Commercialisation extends the life cycle of research, and the recognition for publication in ranking metrics contributes to tension between commercialisation and publication of research.Contribution: Theoretically, this baseline study provided insights into the pathway of Academic Entrepreneurship in the context of an intensive-research university. Managerially, this article reflects that ineffective communication of transition from Mode 1 to Mode 2 leads to internal tension.","PeriodicalId":473635,"journal":{"name":"Suider-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Entrepreneurskap en Kleinsake","volume":"33 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suider-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Entrepreneurskap en Kleinsake","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajesbm.v15i1.680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Universities globally face challenges of becoming entrepreneurial, delivering third mission activities, including the support of academic entrepreneurship. Abundant research exists on academic entrepreneurs in the United Sates (USA) and Europe. Limited research exists on understanding pathways of academic entrepreneurship in South African Universities.Aim: The aim was to critically review the pathway of research commercialisation of academics at a research-intensive university.Setting: This single case study focuses on one research-intensive university; a pioneer in the field of academic entrepreneurship in South Africa.Methods: A qualitative research approach following a single-case study design was selected to investigate a phenomenon within its natural setting, using purposeful sampling and semi-structured interviews. The data were thematically analysed.Results: The nature of research outputs takes a hybrid form, the awareness of the commercialisation of research is ineffectively communicated, supporting mechanisms Technology Transfer Office (TTO) are in place, factors hampering research commercialisation include time constraints and academics’ willingness to partner with the university.Conclusion: Context is bi-modal, meaning the institution is orientated towards basic research, Mode 1, while there is a transition of the research culture towards commercialisation of research, Mode 2, contributing to ineffective communication within the institution. Commercialisation extends the life cycle of research, and the recognition for publication in ranking metrics contributes to tension between commercialisation and publication of research.Contribution: Theoretically, this baseline study provided insights into the pathway of Academic Entrepreneurship in the context of an intensive-research university. Managerially, this article reflects that ineffective communication of transition from Mode 1 to Mode 2 leads to internal tension.
探索学术型企业家的路径:以斯泰伦博斯大学为例
背景:全球大学面临着成为企业家的挑战,提供第三使命活动,包括支持学术创业。美国和欧洲对学院派企业家的研究相当丰富。对南非大学学术创业理解途径的研究有限。目的:目的是批判性地审查研究密集型大学学术研究商业化的途径。背景:这个单一的案例研究集中在一所研究型大学;南非学术创业领域的先驱。方法:采用单案例研究设计的定性研究方法,采用有目的的抽样和半结构化访谈,在自然环境中调查一种现象。对这些数据进行了专题分析。研究结果:研究产出的性质采取混合形式,研究商业化的意识没有得到有效的沟通,支持机制技术转移办公室(TTO)到位,阻碍研究商业化的因素包括时间限制和学者与大学合作的意愿。结论:环境是双模态的,这意味着该机构面向基础研究(模式1),而研究文化向研究商业化(模式2)过渡,导致该机构内部沟通无效。商业化延长了研究的生命周期,而在排名指标中对出版的认可导致了研究商业化和出版之间的紧张关系。贡献:从理论上讲,这一基线研究提供了对研究型大学背景下学术创业路径的见解。在管理上,本文反映了模式1向模式2过渡的沟通无效导致内部紧张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信