Developing autonomy in English writing skills: a study on EFL learners’ selection criteria of open access and online self-correction tools

IF 0.7 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Silvia Sánchez Calderón, Iria Da Cunha Fanego
{"title":"Developing autonomy in English writing skills: a study on EFL learners’ selection criteria of open access and online self-correction tools","authors":"Silvia Sánchez Calderón, Iria Da Cunha Fanego","doi":"10.5209/clac.84416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to investigate, on the one hand, the use of blogs as a didactic resource for the acquisition of English written production skills and, on the other hand, the learners’ experiences and perceptions towards the use of open access and online self-correction tools that have been embedded as a repository of grammar checkers in an institutional blog. In order to shed light on these two issues, we have designed an online blog that hosts 11 open access and online tools that contribute to the learners’ self-awareness of the errors produced in English written texts. A survey was also embedded in the blog to examine the users’ satisfaction levels with regards to navigation, the display of video tutorials (for example, if they contribute to the development of English written skills), and whether the tools available in the blog were previously known by the users and were easy to use for the identification and self-correction of errors produced in English written texts. The results derived from this survey reveal that the respondents (n = 33) found that navigation of the blog functionalities was easy, and this is the case for the 11 tools available in the blog. Among them, the users considered five tools to be highly useful for the identification of grammar and lexical inconsistencies in their English written texts, namely, Hemingway, Language Tool, Reverso, Spell Check Plus and Virtual Writing Tutor.","PeriodicalId":44456,"journal":{"name":"Circulo De Linguistica Aplicada a La Comunicacion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulo De Linguistica Aplicada a La Comunicacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.84416","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to investigate, on the one hand, the use of blogs as a didactic resource for the acquisition of English written production skills and, on the other hand, the learners’ experiences and perceptions towards the use of open access and online self-correction tools that have been embedded as a repository of grammar checkers in an institutional blog. In order to shed light on these two issues, we have designed an online blog that hosts 11 open access and online tools that contribute to the learners’ self-awareness of the errors produced in English written texts. A survey was also embedded in the blog to examine the users’ satisfaction levels with regards to navigation, the display of video tutorials (for example, if they contribute to the development of English written skills), and whether the tools available in the blog were previously known by the users and were easy to use for the identification and self-correction of errors produced in English written texts. The results derived from this survey reveal that the respondents (n = 33) found that navigation of the blog functionalities was easy, and this is the case for the 11 tools available in the blog. Among them, the users considered five tools to be highly useful for the identification of grammar and lexical inconsistencies in their English written texts, namely, Hemingway, Language Tool, Reverso, Spell Check Plus and Virtual Writing Tutor.
培养英语写作的自主性:英语学习者对开放获取和在线自我纠错工具的选择标准研究
本研究的目的是调查,一方面,使用博客作为获得英语书面生产技能的教学资源,另一方面,学习者对使用开放获取和在线自我纠正工具的经验和看法,这些工具已经作为语法检查库嵌入到机构博客中。为了阐明这两个问题,我们设计了一个在线博客,其中包含11个开放获取和在线工具,有助于学习者对英语书面文本中产生的错误进行自我意识。博客中还嵌入了一项调查,以检查用户对导航、视频教程的显示(例如,它们是否有助于英语书面技能的发展)的满意度,以及博客中可用的工具是否为用户先前所知,是否易于使用,以识别和自我纠正英语书面文本中产生的错误。这项调查的结果显示,受访者(n = 33)发现博客功能的导航很容易,博客中可用的11个工具就是这种情况。其中,用户认为有五个工具对识别英语书面文本中的语法和词汇不一致非常有用,分别是海明威、语言工具、Reverso、拼写检查Plus和虚拟写作导师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信