Safety of subarachnoid block in pediatric patients with dilated cardiomyopathy in congestive cardiac failure

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Niranjan K. Sasikumar, Sunil Rajan, Annu S. Abraham, Jerry Paul
{"title":"Safety of subarachnoid block in pediatric patients with dilated cardiomyopathy in congestive cardiac failure","authors":"Niranjan K. Sasikumar, Sunil Rajan, Annu S. Abraham, Jerry Paul","doi":"10.4103/joacp.joacp_287_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sir, Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is characterized by enlargement and dilation of one or both ventricles along with impaired contractility with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of <40% which is progressive with poor survival rates.[1] A 4-year-old boy, weighing 14kg, was posted for wound debridement of bilateral below knee ulcers. He was admitted with breathlessness and swelling over legs. He had history of viral myocarditis, severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, ejection fraction (EF) of 20%, dilated LV/global hypokinesia, and was diagnosed with DCM with congestive heart failure. He was treated with intravenous (IV) frusemide 2mg/kg/day and levosimendan infusion 0.1mcg/kg/min. Currently, he was on milrinone 0.5 mcg/kg/min and frusemide 2mg/kg/day infusions; oral digoxin 1mg on alternate days; and intravenous fluid (IVF) 45mL/hour. Poor prognosis and chance of sudden cardiac death (SCD) were explained to parents. Echo on day of surgery showed DCM, severe biventricular dysfunction, mild pulmonary artery hypertension, dilated ventricles, severe global LV hypokinesia, and severe left and right ventricular dysfunction with LVEF of 14%. Serum electrolytes were normal. Chest X-ray showed cardiomegaly [Figure 1].Figure 1: X-ray chest showing cardiomegalyAs the child was irritable and not cooperative, surgery under nerve blocks and, in view of poor cardiac status, general anesthesia (GA) was not opted for. In the theater, infusions of milrinone, frusemide, and IVF were continued at the same rates through central line. Electrocardiogram, pulseoximeter, and invasive blood pressure (BP) monitors were attached. BP was 86/58 mmHg, and heart rate was 88 beats per minute. 10mg of ketamine was given IV and subarachnoid block was given with 1.6 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine heavy using a 25G spinal needle in a slightly head-up position. Systolic BP remained 90–95 mm Hg after spinal, with block upto T12 level. The surgery lasted one hour. The child underwent wound debridement three more times and skin grafting on the fourth sitting, over a period of three weeks. With gradual deterioration of cardiac status, GA was never considered. All procedures were done under subarachnoid block and were uneventful. He developed no complications pertaining to frequent dural punctures. A previous myocarditis is the most frequent cause of DCM in children with 40% mortality. Children with DCM predominantly experience SCD from pump failure and risk factors are early age at diagnosis, LV dilatation, LV posterior wall thinning (<14 mm) at presentation, heart failure, and low EF.[2,3] The main goals of anesthetic management in patients with DCM are to avoid myocardial depression, maintain adequate preload and prevent increases in afterload, avoid tachycardia, and prevent sudden hypotension by careful titration of anesthetic agents. Central neuraxial blockade may reduce afterload and improve cardiac output, but accompanying hypotension resulting in myocardial hypoperfusion must be prevented. During GA, avoid overdosage of induction agents as circulation time is impaired.[4] Subarachnoid block in children requires a higher dose of local anesthetic due to higher CSF volume with shorter duration of motor block.[5] Hypotension is less, especially in the younger ones, due to immature sympathetic system. It is concluded that subarachnoid block, if carefully chosen, can be a safe alternative to GA in high-risk pediatric patients. Declaration of patient consent The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient (s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initial s will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.","PeriodicalId":14946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anaesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/joacp.joacp_287_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sir, Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is characterized by enlargement and dilation of one or both ventricles along with impaired contractility with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of <40% which is progressive with poor survival rates.[1] A 4-year-old boy, weighing 14kg, was posted for wound debridement of bilateral below knee ulcers. He was admitted with breathlessness and swelling over legs. He had history of viral myocarditis, severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, ejection fraction (EF) of 20%, dilated LV/global hypokinesia, and was diagnosed with DCM with congestive heart failure. He was treated with intravenous (IV) frusemide 2mg/kg/day and levosimendan infusion 0.1mcg/kg/min. Currently, he was on milrinone 0.5 mcg/kg/min and frusemide 2mg/kg/day infusions; oral digoxin 1mg on alternate days; and intravenous fluid (IVF) 45mL/hour. Poor prognosis and chance of sudden cardiac death (SCD) were explained to parents. Echo on day of surgery showed DCM, severe biventricular dysfunction, mild pulmonary artery hypertension, dilated ventricles, severe global LV hypokinesia, and severe left and right ventricular dysfunction with LVEF of 14%. Serum electrolytes were normal. Chest X-ray showed cardiomegaly [Figure 1].Figure 1: X-ray chest showing cardiomegalyAs the child was irritable and not cooperative, surgery under nerve blocks and, in view of poor cardiac status, general anesthesia (GA) was not opted for. In the theater, infusions of milrinone, frusemide, and IVF were continued at the same rates through central line. Electrocardiogram, pulseoximeter, and invasive blood pressure (BP) monitors were attached. BP was 86/58 mmHg, and heart rate was 88 beats per minute. 10mg of ketamine was given IV and subarachnoid block was given with 1.6 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine heavy using a 25G spinal needle in a slightly head-up position. Systolic BP remained 90–95 mm Hg after spinal, with block upto T12 level. The surgery lasted one hour. The child underwent wound debridement three more times and skin grafting on the fourth sitting, over a period of three weeks. With gradual deterioration of cardiac status, GA was never considered. All procedures were done under subarachnoid block and were uneventful. He developed no complications pertaining to frequent dural punctures. A previous myocarditis is the most frequent cause of DCM in children with 40% mortality. Children with DCM predominantly experience SCD from pump failure and risk factors are early age at diagnosis, LV dilatation, LV posterior wall thinning (<14 mm) at presentation, heart failure, and low EF.[2,3] The main goals of anesthetic management in patients with DCM are to avoid myocardial depression, maintain adequate preload and prevent increases in afterload, avoid tachycardia, and prevent sudden hypotension by careful titration of anesthetic agents. Central neuraxial blockade may reduce afterload and improve cardiac output, but accompanying hypotension resulting in myocardial hypoperfusion must be prevented. During GA, avoid overdosage of induction agents as circulation time is impaired.[4] Subarachnoid block in children requires a higher dose of local anesthetic due to higher CSF volume with shorter duration of motor block.[5] Hypotension is less, especially in the younger ones, due to immature sympathetic system. It is concluded that subarachnoid block, if carefully chosen, can be a safe alternative to GA in high-risk pediatric patients. Declaration of patient consent The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient (s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initial s will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.
蛛网膜下腔阻滞治疗充血性心力衰竭扩张型心肌病患儿的安全性
扩张型心肌病(DCM)的特征是单侧或双侧心室扩大和扩张,并伴有收缩力受损,左心室射血分数(LVEF) <40%,呈进行性,生存率低一名4岁男孩,体重14kg,因双侧膝盖以下溃疡进行伤口清创。他因呼吸困难和腿部肿胀入院。患者有病毒性心肌炎病史,严重左室功能不全,射血分数20%,左室扩张/整体运动功能减退,诊断为DCM合并充血性心力衰竭。静脉滴注氟塞米2mg/kg/d,左西孟旦0.1mcg/kg/min。目前,他正在接受米立酮0.5 mcg/kg/min和氟塞米2mg/kg/day输注;口服地高辛1mg,隔天服用;静脉输液(试管婴儿)45mL/小时。患儿预后差,心源性猝死(SCD)发生率高。手术当日超声示DCM、严重双室功能障碍、轻度肺动脉高压、心室扩张、严重全室低运动、严重左右室功能障碍,LVEF为14%。血清电解质正常。胸部x线显示心脏肿大[图1]。图1:胸部x线显示心脏肿大由于患儿易怒且不配合,神经阻滞下手术,鉴于心脏状况不佳,未选择全麻(GA)。在剧院,米立酮、弗鲁塞米和体外受精以相同的速率通过中心静脉管继续输注。附心电图、脉搏血氧仪和有创血压(BP)监测仪。血压为86/58 mmHg,心率为每分钟88次。静脉给予氯胺酮10mg,蛛网膜下腔阻滞1.6 mL 0.5%布比卡因重,使用25G脊髓针,稍抬头位。脊髓后收缩压保持90-95 mm Hg,阻滞至T12水平。手术持续了一个小时。在三周的时间里,患儿又进行了三次伤口清创和第四次植皮。随着心脏状况的逐渐恶化,GA从未被考虑过。所有手术均在蛛网膜下腔阻滞下进行。他没有出现与频繁硬脑膜穿刺有关的并发症。既往心肌炎是儿童DCM的最常见原因,死亡率为40%。DCM患儿主要因泵衰竭而发生SCD,危险因素为诊断时年龄过早、左室扩张、左室后壁变薄(<14 mm)、心力衰竭和低EF。[2,3] DCM患者麻醉管理的主要目标是避免心肌抑制,保持足够的前负荷和防止后负荷增加,避免心动过速,并通过仔细滴定麻醉剂防止突发性低血压。中枢神经轴阻断可以减少后负荷,改善心输出量,但必须防止伴随的低血压导致心肌灌注不足。GA时,避免诱导剂过量,因为会影响循环时间儿童蛛网膜下腔阻滞需要较高剂量的局麻药,因为脑脊液容量较大,运动阻滞持续时间较短由于交感神经系统不成熟,低血压较少,尤其是年轻人。结论:如果谨慎选择蛛网膜下腔阻滞,对于高危儿童患者是一种安全的替代GA的方法。患者同意声明作者证明他们已经获得了所有适当的患者同意表格。以患者同意在期刊上报道其图像和其他临床信息的形式。患者明白他们的姓名和首字母缩写不会被公布,我们会尽力隐藏他们的身份,但不能保证匿名。财政支持及赞助无。利益冲突没有利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
129
期刊介绍: The JOACP publishes original peer-reviewed research and clinical work in all branches of anaesthesiology, pain, critical care and perioperative medicine including the application to basic sciences. In addition, the journal publishes review articles, special articles, brief communications/reports, case reports, and reports of new equipment, letters to editor, book reviews and obituaries. It is international in scope and comprehensive in coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信