Teacher awareness of psychosocial support available as per the Integrated School Health Policy in South Africa

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jace Pillay, Leila Patel, Rubina Setlhare-Kajee
{"title":"Teacher awareness of psychosocial support available as per the Integrated School Health Policy in South Africa","authors":"Jace Pillay, Leila Patel, Rubina Setlhare-Kajee","doi":"10.4102/sajce.v13i1.1172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In 2012, the South African government initiated the Integrated School Health Policy (ISHP) to serve as a national guideline on providing school health and support services from key stakeholders such as the Department of Health (DoH), Department of Basic Education (DBE) and Department of Social Development (DSD). However, despite the ISHP regulations, publications report that teachers in under-resourced government schools are not sufficiently equipped to address their learners’ psychosocial challenges.Aim: This study aimed to assess which psychosocial interventions implemented at the schools the school teachers are aware of.Setting: A total of 50 school teachers from five under-resourced primary schools in Gauteng school communities of Meadowlands, Ivory Park, Alexandra and Doornkop-Soweto completed a feedback questionnaire designed by the investigators.Methods: This descriptive study follows a quantitative descriptive design. A comparative descriptive analysis between schools using frequencies, percentages and graphs was used to analyse the results.Results: Results indicate that a school teachers’ ability to support their learners varies per school and is based on their school’s compliance to training their teachers on the school safety protocols and is not affected much by external training. Schools that follow the ISPH regulations on teachers’ training of protocols, better equip their teachers to observe psychosocial challenges their learners face.Conclusion: Despite the availability of guidelines, this study observes a gap in educators’ observations of mental health concerns or external stakeholders responsible for non-physical assistance.Contribution: Findings of this study provide feedback to all relevant stakeholders to assist in their future recommendations planning. One recommendation the authors of this study suggest may be that further studies explore if the lack of mental health observations is a result of poor teachers–student relations or a need for school teachers to be educated on learner mental health risk factors.","PeriodicalId":55958,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Childhood Education","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Childhood Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v13i1.1172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2012, the South African government initiated the Integrated School Health Policy (ISHP) to serve as a national guideline on providing school health and support services from key stakeholders such as the Department of Health (DoH), Department of Basic Education (DBE) and Department of Social Development (DSD). However, despite the ISHP regulations, publications report that teachers in under-resourced government schools are not sufficiently equipped to address their learners’ psychosocial challenges.Aim: This study aimed to assess which psychosocial interventions implemented at the schools the school teachers are aware of.Setting: A total of 50 school teachers from five under-resourced primary schools in Gauteng school communities of Meadowlands, Ivory Park, Alexandra and Doornkop-Soweto completed a feedback questionnaire designed by the investigators.Methods: This descriptive study follows a quantitative descriptive design. A comparative descriptive analysis between schools using frequencies, percentages and graphs was used to analyse the results.Results: Results indicate that a school teachers’ ability to support their learners varies per school and is based on their school’s compliance to training their teachers on the school safety protocols and is not affected much by external training. Schools that follow the ISPH regulations on teachers’ training of protocols, better equip their teachers to observe psychosocial challenges their learners face.Conclusion: Despite the availability of guidelines, this study observes a gap in educators’ observations of mental health concerns or external stakeholders responsible for non-physical assistance.Contribution: Findings of this study provide feedback to all relevant stakeholders to assist in their future recommendations planning. One recommendation the authors of this study suggest may be that further studies explore if the lack of mental health observations is a result of poor teachers–student relations or a need for school teachers to be educated on learner mental health risk factors.
教师了解根据南非综合学校保健政策可提供的社会心理支持
背景:2012年,南非政府启动了《综合学校卫生政策》(ISHP),作为卫生部、基础教育部和社会发展部等主要利益攸关方提供学校卫生和支助服务的国家指南。然而,尽管有《卫生服务计划》的规定,出版物报告说,资源不足的公立学校的教师没有足够的能力来解决学生的社会心理挑战。目的:本研究旨在评估学校教师对学校实施的心理社会干预措施的了解程度。背景:来自豪登省Meadowlands、Ivory Park、Alexandra和doornkopp - soweto学校社区五所资源不足的小学的50名教师完成了由调查人员设计的反馈问卷。方法:本研究采用定量描述设计。使用频率,百分比和图表对学校之间的比较描述性分析来分析结果。结果:结果表明,学校教师支持学习者的能力因学校而异,其基础是学校是否遵守学校安全协议的培训,而外部培训对其影响不大。遵循ISPH关于教师协议培训的规定的学校,使他们的教师能够更好地观察学生面临的心理社会挑战。结论:尽管有指导方针,但本研究发现,教育者对心理健康问题的观察与负责非物质援助的外部利益相关者的观察存在差距。贡献:本研究的发现为所有相关利益相关者提供了反馈,以协助他们未来的建议规划。这项研究的作者提出的一个建议是,进一步的研究可能会探讨缺乏心理健康观察是由于师生关系不佳还是学校教师需要接受关于学习者心理健康风险因素的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
South African Journal of Childhood Education
South African Journal of Childhood Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信