Sex disparities in patients with acute aortic dissection: A scoping review

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Amanda C. Filiberto , Omar I. Ramadan , Grace J. Wang , Michol A. Cooper
{"title":"Sex disparities in patients with acute aortic dissection: A scoping review","authors":"Amanda C. Filiberto ,&nbsp;Omar I. Ramadan ,&nbsp;Grace J. Wang ,&nbsp;Michol A. Cooper","doi":"10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2023.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Disparities in outcomes for patients with cardiovascular disease and those undergoing cardiac or vascular operations are well-established. These disparities often span several dimensions and persist despite advancements in medical and surgical care; sex is among the most pervasive. Specifically, females sex has been implicated as a predictor of poor outcomes in both patients with acute type A </span>aortic dissections<span> (ATAADs) and type B aortic dissections (TBADs). For instance, one study, using the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection database, found that females with acute aortic dissection—including ATAAD and TBAD that were either medically or surgically managed—had 40% higher odds of in-hospital mortality than men. Notably, both types of acute aortic dissections affect men more commonly than females and can be life-threatening without prompt, appropriate treatment. The underlying mechanisms for these disparities are unclear but are thought to be multifactorial. The association of sex with patterns of disease and outcomes </span></span>in patients with ATAAD or TBAD remains unclear, with conflicting reports from different studies. Thus, we sought to review the literature regarding sex disparities in patients with ATAAD and TBAD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895796723000601","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disparities in outcomes for patients with cardiovascular disease and those undergoing cardiac or vascular operations are well-established. These disparities often span several dimensions and persist despite advancements in medical and surgical care; sex is among the most pervasive. Specifically, females sex has been implicated as a predictor of poor outcomes in both patients with acute type A aortic dissections (ATAADs) and type B aortic dissections (TBADs). For instance, one study, using the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection database, found that females with acute aortic dissection—including ATAAD and TBAD that were either medically or surgically managed—had 40% higher odds of in-hospital mortality than men. Notably, both types of acute aortic dissections affect men more commonly than females and can be life-threatening without prompt, appropriate treatment. The underlying mechanisms for these disparities are unclear but are thought to be multifactorial. The association of sex with patterns of disease and outcomes in patients with ATAAD or TBAD remains unclear, with conflicting reports from different studies. Thus, we sought to review the literature regarding sex disparities in patients with ATAAD and TBAD.

急性主动脉夹层患者的性别差异:范围回顾
心血管疾病患者和接受心脏或血管手术的患者的预后差异是公认的。这些差异往往涉及多个方面,尽管医疗和外科护理取得了进步,但这些差异仍然存在,其中性别差异最为普遍。具体来说,女性已被认为是急性a型主动脉夹层(ATAAD)和B型主动脉夹层(TBAD)患者预后不良的预测因子。例如,Nienaber等人利用国际急性主动脉夹层登记处(IRAD)数据库证明,患有急性主动脉夹层的女性——包括经药物或手术治疗的ATAAD和TBAD——住院死亡率比男性高40%。值得注意的是,这两种类型的急性主动脉夹层对男性的影响比女性更普遍,如果不及时、适当的治疗,可能会危及生命。这些差异的潜在机制尚不清楚,但被认为是多因素的。性别与ATAAD或TBAD患者的疾病模式和预后之间的关系尚不清楚,不同研究的报告相互矛盾。因此,我们试图回顾有关ATAAD和TBAD患者性别差异的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信