Cinematic Comanches: The Lone Ranger in the Media Borderlands by Dustin Tahmahkera (review)

Jacob Floyd
{"title":"Cinematic Comanches: The Lone Ranger in the Media Borderlands by Dustin Tahmahkera (review)","authors":"Jacob Floyd","doi":"10.1353/aiq.2023.a901588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reviewed by: Cinematic Comanches: The Lone Ranger in the Media Borderlands by Dustin Tahmahkera Jacob Floyd Dustin Tahmahkera. Cinematic Comanches: The Lone Ranger in the Media Borderlands. Lincoln: The University of Nebraska Press, 2022. 263 pp. Paperback, $35.00. Comanche scholar Dustin Tahmahkera's Cinematic Comanches: The Lone Ranger in the Media Borderlands explores the Disney-produced 2013 adaption of The Lone Ranger but, as he writes, it is \"not a book on The Lone Ranger\" (19). Instead, Tahmahkera uses the film to analyze how Comanche people, past and present, have represented themselves in media. This is a significant shift in focus because he does not \"situate Comanches into a study of film,\" or limit his study to on-screen representation, but instead positions the film within Comanche history and media practice, exploring multiple facets of Comanche agency in the production and reception of media (19). These \"cinematic Comanches\" include not only filmmakers and actors but also those in other roles in the industry, and those involved in off-screen activism and criticism. Applying methods of Indigenous scholarship to film studies, this interdisciplinary and intertextual work puts The Lone Ranger, and the discourses surrounding it, into conversation with historical and popular culture narratives. The book argues for the importance of Comanche media representation by situating cinema as part of a larger history of the \"textual circulation of Comanche significations,\" which includes captivity narratives, literature, and especially historical works (12). In every site of representation, Tahmahkera argues that Comanches exercise \"representational jurisdiction,\" which asks \"who shapes and controls the production, performance, and perception of Indigenous representations\" (29). These representations exist within the \"media borderlands,\" Tahmahkera's term that recalls the borderlands space of Greater Comanchería, and conceptualizes \"intertextuality across symbolic territories, genres (e.g., western films, newspapers, blogs) and categories of cultural analysis (e.g., race, indigeneity, kinship)\" (5). [End Page 86] Cinematic Comanches is effectively organized by key concepts that roughly correspond to events surrounding the film's release and screening in Comanche Nation. \"Jurisdiction\" explores a genealogy of \"representational jurisdiction\" among Comanches who have sought to represent themselves in media, moving from a 2006 PBS reality show to Tahmahkera \"recrediting\" his relative Quanah Parker's role in 1908's The Bank Robbery (42). In \"Kinship\" he contextualizes Comanche elder LaDonna Harris's adoption of Johnny Depp during the controversy surrounding his casting as Tonto through Harris's history of activism as well as histories of Comanche captive-taking. \"Performance\" enlarges the Comanche presence in The Lone Ranger by reading it \"through the lens of intertextual Comanche citations,\" the images, historical events, and other movies referenced in the film (114). \"Audience\" analyzes three sites of critical Native dialogue about the film after its release and its place in larger debates about Native representation in media. The 2013 film is a rich subject for Tahmahkera's intertextual approach, because even before its release it was difficult to separate the movie from the discourses surrounding it. Largely a vehicle for its star Johnny Depp, it was subject to controversy regarding his casting as Tonto and his claims of Native ancestry, controversies that played out in publicity and promotion for the film, newspaper editorials, and on social media. In addition, the film was the topic of lively debates within Indian Country about revisiting the Tonto character, and Tahmahkera chronicles statements by those involved in the production attempting to reassure Native audiences that this film would be different, directly placing it into conversation with other Native (mis)representations across film history. The movie's massive budget, the reputation of its star and producers, and its penchant for recycling elements from other, older western films were also topics of discourse, and at times disdain, within the industry and among critics. What's more, The Lone Ranger is a franchise with a long multimedia history (see Avi Santo's Selling the Silver Bullet, 2015) that informed the 2013 remake, and Tahmahkera displays a deep knowledge of the Lone Ranger's media history (from the radio show to the 2013 film novelization). In chronicling these discourses, Tahmahkera deftly balances the voices of producers, actors, Native and non-Native critics, and members of the Comanche Nation, along...","PeriodicalId":80425,"journal":{"name":"American Indian quarterly","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Indian quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/aiq.2023.a901588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by: Cinematic Comanches: The Lone Ranger in the Media Borderlands by Dustin Tahmahkera Jacob Floyd Dustin Tahmahkera. Cinematic Comanches: The Lone Ranger in the Media Borderlands. Lincoln: The University of Nebraska Press, 2022. 263 pp. Paperback, $35.00. Comanche scholar Dustin Tahmahkera's Cinematic Comanches: The Lone Ranger in the Media Borderlands explores the Disney-produced 2013 adaption of The Lone Ranger but, as he writes, it is "not a book on The Lone Ranger" (19). Instead, Tahmahkera uses the film to analyze how Comanche people, past and present, have represented themselves in media. This is a significant shift in focus because he does not "situate Comanches into a study of film," or limit his study to on-screen representation, but instead positions the film within Comanche history and media practice, exploring multiple facets of Comanche agency in the production and reception of media (19). These "cinematic Comanches" include not only filmmakers and actors but also those in other roles in the industry, and those involved in off-screen activism and criticism. Applying methods of Indigenous scholarship to film studies, this interdisciplinary and intertextual work puts The Lone Ranger, and the discourses surrounding it, into conversation with historical and popular culture narratives. The book argues for the importance of Comanche media representation by situating cinema as part of a larger history of the "textual circulation of Comanche significations," which includes captivity narratives, literature, and especially historical works (12). In every site of representation, Tahmahkera argues that Comanches exercise "representational jurisdiction," which asks "who shapes and controls the production, performance, and perception of Indigenous representations" (29). These representations exist within the "media borderlands," Tahmahkera's term that recalls the borderlands space of Greater Comanchería, and conceptualizes "intertextuality across symbolic territories, genres (e.g., western films, newspapers, blogs) and categories of cultural analysis (e.g., race, indigeneity, kinship)" (5). [End Page 86] Cinematic Comanches is effectively organized by key concepts that roughly correspond to events surrounding the film's release and screening in Comanche Nation. "Jurisdiction" explores a genealogy of "representational jurisdiction" among Comanches who have sought to represent themselves in media, moving from a 2006 PBS reality show to Tahmahkera "recrediting" his relative Quanah Parker's role in 1908's The Bank Robbery (42). In "Kinship" he contextualizes Comanche elder LaDonna Harris's adoption of Johnny Depp during the controversy surrounding his casting as Tonto through Harris's history of activism as well as histories of Comanche captive-taking. "Performance" enlarges the Comanche presence in The Lone Ranger by reading it "through the lens of intertextual Comanche citations," the images, historical events, and other movies referenced in the film (114). "Audience" analyzes three sites of critical Native dialogue about the film after its release and its place in larger debates about Native representation in media. The 2013 film is a rich subject for Tahmahkera's intertextual approach, because even before its release it was difficult to separate the movie from the discourses surrounding it. Largely a vehicle for its star Johnny Depp, it was subject to controversy regarding his casting as Tonto and his claims of Native ancestry, controversies that played out in publicity and promotion for the film, newspaper editorials, and on social media. In addition, the film was the topic of lively debates within Indian Country about revisiting the Tonto character, and Tahmahkera chronicles statements by those involved in the production attempting to reassure Native audiences that this film would be different, directly placing it into conversation with other Native (mis)representations across film history. The movie's massive budget, the reputation of its star and producers, and its penchant for recycling elements from other, older western films were also topics of discourse, and at times disdain, within the industry and among critics. What's more, The Lone Ranger is a franchise with a long multimedia history (see Avi Santo's Selling the Silver Bullet, 2015) that informed the 2013 remake, and Tahmahkera displays a deep knowledge of the Lone Ranger's media history (from the radio show to the 2013 film novelization). In chronicling these discourses, Tahmahkera deftly balances the voices of producers, actors, Native and non-Native critics, and members of the Comanche Nation, along...
达斯汀·塔马赫凯拉《电影科曼奇:媒体边境的独行侠》(评论)
评论人:电影科曼奇斯:媒体边境的独行侠,作者:达斯汀·塔马赫凯拉电影科曼奇:媒体边境地带的独行侠。林肯:内布拉斯加大学出版社,2022。263页,平装本,35美元。科曼奇学者达斯汀·塔马赫凯拉的《电影科曼奇:媒体边境的独行侠》探讨了迪士尼2013年改编的《独行侠》,但正如他所写的,这“不是一本关于《独行侠》的书”(19)。相反,Tahmahkera用这部电影来分析过去和现在的科曼奇人是如何在媒体中表现自己的。这是一个重要的焦点转变,因为他没有“将科曼奇人置于电影研究中”,也没有将他的研究局限于银幕上的表现,而是将电影置于科曼奇人的历史和媒体实践中,探索科曼奇人在媒体制作和接受中的多个方面(19)。这些“电影界的科曼奇”不仅包括电影制作人和演员,还包括那些在电影行业中担任其他角色的人,以及那些参与银幕外活动和批评的人。这部跨学科、互文性的作品将《独行侠》及其周围的话语与历史和流行文化叙事进行了对话,将本土学术方法应用于电影研究。这本书通过将电影定位为“科曼奇意义的文本流通”的更大历史的一部分来论证科曼奇媒体表现的重要性,其中包括囚禁叙事,文学,尤其是历史作品(12)。在每一个代表的场所,Tahmahkera认为科曼奇行使“代表管辖权”,这就要求“谁塑造和控制土著代表的生产、表现和感知”(29)。这些表现存在于“媒体边界地带”中,Tahmahkera的术语让人想起了Greater Comanchería的边界地带空间,并概念化了“跨象征领域、类型(如西方电影、报纸、博客)和文化分析类别(如种族、土著、亲属关系)的互文性”。(5) [End Page 86]电影《科曼奇》是由一些关键概念有效地组织起来的,这些概念大致对应了电影在科曼奇国家上映和放映的事件。《司法管辖权》探索了科曼奇们“代表性司法管辖权”的谱系,这些科曼奇们试图在媒体上代表自己,从2006年的PBS真人秀到塔马赫凯拉在1908年的《银行抢劫案》(42)中“重新定义”了他的亲戚Quanah Parker的角色。在《亲缘关系》中,他将科曼奇长老拉多娜·哈里斯(LaDonna Harris)收养约翰尼·德普(Johnny Depp)的故事背景化,通过哈里斯(Harris)的激进主义历史以及科曼奇人被俘虏的历史来讲述。“表演”扩大了科曼奇在《独行侠》中的存在,“通过科曼奇互文引用的镜头”,通过电影中引用的图像、历史事件和其他电影来解读它(114)。“观众”一章分析了影片上映后原住民对影片的三个批判性对话地点,以及影片在关于媒体中原住民代表性的更大辩论中的地位。对于塔马赫凯拉的互文方法来说,这部2013年的电影是一个丰富的主题,因为即使在上映之前,也很难将这部电影与围绕它的话语分开。这部影片主要是为主演约翰尼·德普(Johnny Depp)打造的,但他饰演的汤托(Tonto)和他声称的土著血统引发了争议,这些争议在电影的宣传和推广、报纸社论和社交媒体上都有体现。此外,这部电影是印度国内关于重新审视汤托这个角色的热烈辩论的话题,塔马赫凯拉记录了参与制作的人的陈述,他们试图向土著观众保证,这部电影会有所不同,直接将其与电影史上其他土著(错误)表现进行了对话。这部电影的巨额预算、主演和制片人的声誉,以及它对其他老西方电影元素的重复利用,也成为业内和影评人讨论的话题,有时甚至受到鄙视。更重要的是,《独行侠》是一个有着悠久多媒体历史的系列电影(参见阿维·桑托2015年的《卖银弹》),这为2013年的翻拍提供了信息,塔马赫凯拉对《独行侠》的媒体历史(从广播节目到2013年的电影小说)有着深刻的了解。在记录这些话语时,Tahmahkera巧妙地平衡了制片人、演员、土著和非土著评论家以及科曼奇族成员的声音,以及……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信