Computational Thinking and Why It Matters

Beth Murphy
{"title":"Computational Thinking and Why It Matters","authors":"Beth Murphy","doi":"10.1080/24758779.2023.12318620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractEvery now and then, I think of how much schooling has changed since I was a kid. This is true across all disciplines, and certainly when it comes to science-related subjects. Honestly, as I write this, only a single science memory from before ninth grade comes to mind: learning about archaeological discoveries from textbook and film. I must admit, though, the fact that I remember this is most likely because my classmate Rusty ran around the wooded part of our schoolyard during recess for the better part of a week pretending he was Dr. Richard Leakey digging up Homo sapiens skulls, not because of any classroom lesson. Clearly, Rusty found the textbook reading to be inspiring; I doubt it worked out that way for most of my classmates. Looking back, I realize that I went into science because I liked solving word problems, not because I wanted to be a scientist or, frankly, really understood what the job of a scientist was like. When I was a graduate student and even an early-career college professor, I struggled with coming up with my own questions to investigate because my prior experience honing this skill was so limited. I think of how much better prepared I would have been if I learned science as it is being taught now.Keywords: Informal Education Additional informationNotes on contributorsBeth MurphyBeth Murphy, PhD (bmurphy@nsta.org), is field editor for Connected Science Learning and an independent STEM education consultant with expertise in fostering collaboration between organizations and schools, providing professional learning experiences for educators, and implementing program evaluation that supports practitioners to do their best work.","PeriodicalId":72694,"journal":{"name":"Connected science learning","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Connected science learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24758779.2023.12318620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractEvery now and then, I think of how much schooling has changed since I was a kid. This is true across all disciplines, and certainly when it comes to science-related subjects. Honestly, as I write this, only a single science memory from before ninth grade comes to mind: learning about archaeological discoveries from textbook and film. I must admit, though, the fact that I remember this is most likely because my classmate Rusty ran around the wooded part of our schoolyard during recess for the better part of a week pretending he was Dr. Richard Leakey digging up Homo sapiens skulls, not because of any classroom lesson. Clearly, Rusty found the textbook reading to be inspiring; I doubt it worked out that way for most of my classmates. Looking back, I realize that I went into science because I liked solving word problems, not because I wanted to be a scientist or, frankly, really understood what the job of a scientist was like. When I was a graduate student and even an early-career college professor, I struggled with coming up with my own questions to investigate because my prior experience honing this skill was so limited. I think of how much better prepared I would have been if I learned science as it is being taught now.Keywords: Informal Education Additional informationNotes on contributorsBeth MurphyBeth Murphy, PhD (bmurphy@nsta.org), is field editor for Connected Science Learning and an independent STEM education consultant with expertise in fostering collaboration between organizations and schools, providing professional learning experiences for educators, and implementing program evaluation that supports practitioners to do their best work.
计算思维及其重要性
每隔一段时间,我就会想到与我小时候相比,学校教育发生了多大的变化。这在所有学科中都是正确的,当然当涉及到与科学相关的学科时。老实说,当我写这篇文章的时候,我脑海中只有一个九年级之前的科学记忆:从教科书和电影中学习考古发现。不过,我必须承认,我之所以记得这件事,很可能是因为我的同学拉什蒂在一个星期的大部分时间里,趁着课间休息,在我们校园的树林里跑来跑去,假装自己是理查德·利基博士,正在挖掘智人的头骨,而不是因为课堂上的任何课程。显然,罗斯蒂觉得阅读教科书很有启发性;我怀疑我的大多数同学都是这样。回想起来,我意识到我进入科学领域是因为我喜欢解决文字问题,而不是因为我想成为一名科学家,或者坦率地说,我真正了解科学家的工作是什么样的。当我还是一名研究生,甚至是刚入职不久的大学教授时,我很难提出自己要研究的问题,因为我之前磨练这项技能的经验非常有限。我想,如果我按照现在教授的方式学习科学,我会准备得更好。关键词:非正式教育附加信息撰稿人说明beth Murphy beth Murphy博士(bmurphy@nsta.org),是Connected Science Learning的现场编辑,也是一名独立的STEM教育顾问,擅长促进组织和学校之间的合作,为教育工作者提供专业的学习经验,并实施项目评估,支持从业者做到最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信