Faculty Perspectives on Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Access (IDEA) in Online Teaching

IF 2.8 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ryan A. Miller, Cathy D. Howell, Beth Oyarzun, Florence Martin, Shawn Knight, Jacob N. Frankovich
{"title":"Faculty Perspectives on Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Access (IDEA) in Online Teaching","authors":"Ryan A. Miller, Cathy D. Howell, Beth Oyarzun, Florence Martin, Shawn Knight, Jacob N. Frankovich","doi":"10.24059/olj.v27i3.3691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study contributes to a better understanding of instructors’ perceptions of equity issues within online teaching and learning. The researchers conducted interviews with 21 instructors at one university across disciplines regarding their experience with, and recommendations for, attending to issues of inclusion, diversity, equity, and access (IDEA) in online teaching. Findings revealed that instructors characterized online teaching and IDEA issues as distinct skillsets and that they were not necessarily prepared to apply IDEA issues in online teaching. Participants also focused their attention much more on access and inclusion—with access as a baseline expectation and inclusion operationalized as relationship building—rather than on equity and diversity, areas in which faculty efforts often translated (or not) from their face-to-face teaching experience. We conclude the paper with implications for faculty, educational developers, administrators, and institutions.","PeriodicalId":54195,"journal":{"name":"Online Learning","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i3.3691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study contributes to a better understanding of instructors’ perceptions of equity issues within online teaching and learning. The researchers conducted interviews with 21 instructors at one university across disciplines regarding their experience with, and recommendations for, attending to issues of inclusion, diversity, equity, and access (IDEA) in online teaching. Findings revealed that instructors characterized online teaching and IDEA issues as distinct skillsets and that they were not necessarily prepared to apply IDEA issues in online teaching. Participants also focused their attention much more on access and inclusion—with access as a baseline expectation and inclusion operationalized as relationship building—rather than on equity and diversity, areas in which faculty efforts often translated (or not) from their face-to-face teaching experience. We conclude the paper with implications for faculty, educational developers, administrators, and institutions.
教师对在线教学中的包容、多样性、公平和可及性的看法
本研究有助于更好地了解教师对在线教学中公平问题的看法。研究人员对一所大学的21名跨学科教师进行了采访,了解他们在在线教学中的包容性、多样性、公平性和可及性(IDEA)问题上的经验和建议。调查结果显示,教师将在线教学和IDEA问题视为不同的技能组合,他们不一定准备好将IDEA问题应用于在线教学。参与者还将注意力更多地集中在获取和包容上——将获取作为基准期望,将包容作为关系建立的操作——而不是公平和多样性,这两个领域的教师努力往往来自(或不来自)面对面的教学经验。我们总结了对教师、教育开发者、管理者和机构的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Online Learning
Online Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
15.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信