Problems of training and selecting scientific personnel for solving tasks of military science

Olga Dvornikova, Vasily Samokhin, Sergey Dvornikov, Andrey Hudyakov
{"title":"Problems of training and selecting scientific personnel for solving tasks of military science","authors":"Olga Dvornikova, Vasily Samokhin, Sergey Dvornikov, Andrey Hudyakov","doi":"10.30987/2658-4026-2023-3-212-225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The tasks solved by military science are considered. Their effective solution is shown to be possible only with the direct participation of competent specialists who deeply understand this issue particularity. Substantiated argumentation of this thesis is presented. The system uniqueness of training military specialists and scientists in military educational institutions is shown. Its specificity is considered from the standpoint of the hierarchical structure. The existing approach to selecting future personnel for admission to postgraduate studies is analysed. The paper states that the competence and professionalism of a military university graduate primarily depend on the applicant’s level of general education, since he eventually becomes an officer. The mechanism of selecting and appointing to positions of researchers and teachers in military universities is defined. The main problems and shortcomings of the existing approach to training specialists for working in the field of military science are revealed. In particular, the paper shows that upon admitting to postgraduate studies, it is not the applicant’s cognitive abilities that are checked, but his ability to prepare an answer to the formulated question. As a result, the applicant’s cognitive abilities are not revealed. The authors substantiate that a comprehensive solution to this problem is possible only as a result of changing the very approach to recruiting adjuncts and graduate students. Namely, in addition to the successful passing of the entrance exams, it is proposed to additionally consider indicators that characterise applicants’ abilities for scientific activity, which are determined, among other things, by their creativity. It is substantiated that when selecting scientific personnel, it is necessary to take into account not only their desire and capabilities, determined by the exam results, but also the test results that characterise their creative component. The main stages of the methodology for selecting specialists for working in the field of military science are presented, considering individual indicators that mark their creativity while performing official duties for their intended purpose. The indicators representing creativity are determined. The Pareto principle usage is substantiated.","PeriodicalId":472891,"journal":{"name":"Èrgodizajn","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Èrgodizajn","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30987/2658-4026-2023-3-212-225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The tasks solved by military science are considered. Their effective solution is shown to be possible only with the direct participation of competent specialists who deeply understand this issue particularity. Substantiated argumentation of this thesis is presented. The system uniqueness of training military specialists and scientists in military educational institutions is shown. Its specificity is considered from the standpoint of the hierarchical structure. The existing approach to selecting future personnel for admission to postgraduate studies is analysed. The paper states that the competence and professionalism of a military university graduate primarily depend on the applicant’s level of general education, since he eventually becomes an officer. The mechanism of selecting and appointing to positions of researchers and teachers in military universities is defined. The main problems and shortcomings of the existing approach to training specialists for working in the field of military science are revealed. In particular, the paper shows that upon admitting to postgraduate studies, it is not the applicant’s cognitive abilities that are checked, but his ability to prepare an answer to the formulated question. As a result, the applicant’s cognitive abilities are not revealed. The authors substantiate that a comprehensive solution to this problem is possible only as a result of changing the very approach to recruiting adjuncts and graduate students. Namely, in addition to the successful passing of the entrance exams, it is proposed to additionally consider indicators that characterise applicants’ abilities for scientific activity, which are determined, among other things, by their creativity. It is substantiated that when selecting scientific personnel, it is necessary to take into account not only their desire and capabilities, determined by the exam results, but also the test results that characterise their creative component. The main stages of the methodology for selecting specialists for working in the field of military science are presented, considering individual indicators that mark their creativity while performing official duties for their intended purpose. The indicators representing creativity are determined. The Pareto principle usage is substantiated.
为解决军事科学任务而培养和选拔科学人才的问题
考虑了军事科学要解决的任务。这些问题的有效解决只有在深入了解这一问题特殊性的主管专家的直接参与下才有可能。并对本文的论点进行了论证。体现了军事院校培养军事专家和科学人才的制度独特性。从层次结构的角度考虑其特殊性。分析了目前选拔未来研究生入学人员的方法。文章指出,军事大学毕业生的能力和专业精神主要取决于申请人的通识教育水平,因为他最终会成为一名军官。明确了军事院校科研人员和教师岗位的选拔任用机制。揭示了现有军事科学专业人才培养方法存在的主要问题和不足。特别是,该论文表明,在进入研究生学习后,检查的不是申请人的认知能力,而是他准备公式问题答案的能力。因此,申请人的认知能力并没有被揭示出来。作者证实,只有改变征聘兼职教员和研究生的方法,才有可能全面解决这个问题。也就是说,除了成功通过入学考试外,建议还考虑表征申请人科学活动能力的指标,这些指标除其他外是由他们的创造力决定的。事实证明,在选择科学人员时,不仅要考虑由考试成绩决定的他们的愿望和能力,而且要考虑表征其创造性成分的测试结果。介绍了在军事科学领域工作的选择专家方法的主要阶段,并考虑到在为其预定目的执行公务时标志其创造性的个别指标。确定了代表创造力的指标。帕累托原理的应用得到了证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信