Employability in the post-job security era: testing competing effects of perceived job insecurity on perceived employability change

IF 4 2区 心理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Wiebke Doden, Ilke Grosemans, Nele De Cuyper, Cécile Tschopp, Gudela Grote
{"title":"Employability in the post-job security era: testing competing effects of perceived job insecurity on perceived employability change","authors":"Wiebke Doden, Ilke Grosemans, Nele De Cuyper, Cécile Tschopp, Gudela Grote","doi":"10.1080/1359432x.2023.2263201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perceived job insecurity and perceived employability are often mentioned in one breath with employability typically referred to as the “modern response to job insecurity”. Yet our understanding of how individuals’ perceptions of employability may change over time in response to job insecurity is limited. Both positive and negative changes seem plausible: Job insecurity may trigger employees to invest in employability, making them feel more employable. However, job insecurity may also elicit a defensive response in employees that undermines their perceived employability. We tested these two competing hypotheses against the background of conservation of resources theory in a sample of 358 employees surveyed on three occasions across 3.5 years. Using latent change score modelling, our findings suggest that job insecurity increases perceived employability. That is, the state-level of perceived job insecurity predicts a positive subsequent change in perceived employability. These findings highlight the importance of considering the dynamic within-person perspective to understand the relationship between job insecurity and perceived employability, and illustrate that results observed in prior static research may lead to different conclusions in within-person longitudinal studies. Implications of our findings for theory and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":48240,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2023.2263201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perceived job insecurity and perceived employability are often mentioned in one breath with employability typically referred to as the “modern response to job insecurity”. Yet our understanding of how individuals’ perceptions of employability may change over time in response to job insecurity is limited. Both positive and negative changes seem plausible: Job insecurity may trigger employees to invest in employability, making them feel more employable. However, job insecurity may also elicit a defensive response in employees that undermines their perceived employability. We tested these two competing hypotheses against the background of conservation of resources theory in a sample of 358 employees surveyed on three occasions across 3.5 years. Using latent change score modelling, our findings suggest that job insecurity increases perceived employability. That is, the state-level of perceived job insecurity predicts a positive subsequent change in perceived employability. These findings highlight the importance of considering the dynamic within-person perspective to understand the relationship between job insecurity and perceived employability, and illustrate that results observed in prior static research may lead to different conclusions in within-person longitudinal studies. Implications of our findings for theory and practice are discussed.
后工作保障时代的就业能力:测试感知工作不安全感对感知就业能力变化的竞争效应
感知工作不安全感和感知就业能力经常被同时提到,而就业能力通常被称为“对工作不安全感的现代反应”。然而,对于个人对就业能力的看法如何随着时间的推移而随着工作不安全感的变化,我们的理解是有限的。积极和消极的变化似乎都是合理的:工作不安全感可能会促使员工投资于就业能力,使他们觉得自己更有竞争力。然而,工作不安全感也可能引起员工的防御反应,从而破坏他们的就业能力。在资源节约理论的背景下,我们对358名员工进行了为期3.5年的三次调查,对这两种相互竞争的假设进行了测试。使用潜在变化得分模型,我们的研究结果表明,工作不安全感增加了感知就业能力。也就是说,国家层面的感知工作不安全感预示着感知就业能力的积极变化。这些发现强调了考虑动态内部视角来理解工作不安全感与感知就业能力之间关系的重要性,并说明了在先前的静态研究中观察到的结果可能会在内部纵向研究中得出不同的结论。讨论了研究结果对理论和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The mission of the European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology is to promote and support the development of Work and Organizational Psychology by publishing high-quality scientific articles that improve our understanding of phenomena occurring in work and organizational settings. The journal publishes empirical, theoretical, methodological, and review articles that are relevant to real-world situations. The journal has a world-wide authorship, readership and editorial board. Submissions from all around the world are invited.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信