A systematic mapping study of standards and frameworks for information management in the digital era

Gunnar Auth, Oliver Jokisch
{"title":"A systematic mapping study of standards and frameworks for information management in the digital era","authors":"Gunnar Auth, Oliver Jokisch","doi":"10.36965/ojakm.2023.11(1)1-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The close links of Information Management (IM) and Information Technology (IT) create an evolving environment of tasks and processes. Management standards are normative descriptions of an agreed-upon set of management tasks and suggested ways of task execution. Certain standards like ITIL and COBIT (both used as a brand only by the owners, Axelos and ISACA respectively) have been popular for a long time in sub-areas of IM including IT governance, IT service management, or IT project management. Driven by digitalization, the number and update frequency of IM-related standards have significantly increased recently, making standard selection and implementation more difficult. This study presents a systematic mapping of the current state of IM standardization with respect to standardization bodies, types of standards, and certifications. Visual maps provide an overview of the IM standard landscape and reveal relevant topics and other categories. The article identifies the most relevant standardization bodies, standard types, and topics of the IM domain based on a full set of 109 IM standards. As a mapping outcome, the correlations of standardization bodies versus standard types, and of the topics versus IM task areas are clearly arranged in diagrams.","PeriodicalId":484625,"journal":{"name":"The Online journal of applied knowledge management","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Online journal of applied knowledge management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36965/ojakm.2023.11(1)1-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The close links of Information Management (IM) and Information Technology (IT) create an evolving environment of tasks and processes. Management standards are normative descriptions of an agreed-upon set of management tasks and suggested ways of task execution. Certain standards like ITIL and COBIT (both used as a brand only by the owners, Axelos and ISACA respectively) have been popular for a long time in sub-areas of IM including IT governance, IT service management, or IT project management. Driven by digitalization, the number and update frequency of IM-related standards have significantly increased recently, making standard selection and implementation more difficult. This study presents a systematic mapping of the current state of IM standardization with respect to standardization bodies, types of standards, and certifications. Visual maps provide an overview of the IM standard landscape and reveal relevant topics and other categories. The article identifies the most relevant standardization bodies, standard types, and topics of the IM domain based on a full set of 109 IM standards. As a mapping outcome, the correlations of standardization bodies versus standard types, and of the topics versus IM task areas are clearly arranged in diagrams.
数字时代信息管理标准与框架的系统映射研究
信息管理(IM)和信息技术(IT)的紧密联系创造了一个不断发展的任务和流程环境。管理标准是对一组商定的管理任务和建议的任务执行方式的规范性描述。某些标准,如ITIL和COBIT(两者都仅被所有者Axelos和ISACA作为品牌使用)在IM的子领域,包括IT治理、IT服务管理或IT项目管理,已经流行了很长时间。在数字化的推动下,近年来im相关标准的数量和更新频率显著增加,使得标准的选择和实施更加困难。本研究从标准化机构、标准类型和认证等方面系统地展示了IM标准化的现状。可视化地图提供了IM标准景观的概述,并揭示了相关主题和其他类别。本文根据全套的109个IM标准,确定了IM领域最相关的标准化机构、标准类型和主题。作为映射结果,标准化主体与标准类型之间的相关性,以及主题与IM任务区域之间的相关性都清晰地安排在图中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信