REIT Long-Term Returns and Wealth Creation

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Gow-Cheng Huang, Kartono Liano, Ming-Shiun Pan
{"title":"REIT Long-Term Returns and Wealth Creation","authors":"Gow-Cheng Huang, Kartono Liano, Ming-Shiun Pan","doi":"10.1080/08965803.2023.2254587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThis study examined the performance of 371 equity real estate investment trusts (REITs) over the period 1972–2020. Unlike stocks, we found that the majority of the 371 REITs outperformed one-month T-bills, particularly over longer holding periods and in the modern REIT era. While most REITs outperformed the T-bills, only a minority of them outperformed the overall equity REIT market. REITs that outperformed the overall equity REIT market concentrated in the health care, industrial, residential, and other specialty REIT sectors. In terms of wealth creation, REITs in aggregate created a total net wealth of $0.89 trillion to their shareholders, but the wealth creation was highly concentrated in relatively few top-performing REITs. Specifically, the top five (20) REITs together accounted for almost 30% (60%) of the total net wealth creation. Overall, our results suggest that relative to the T-bills, REITs performed better than stocks.Keywords: Real estate investment trustsREIT return performanceshareholder wealth AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank three anonymous referees for helpful comments.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1 The maximum lifetime return was 37,628% for REITs, while it was 244.3 million % for stocks.2 For example, Bessembinder (Citation2018) reported that the mean and median monthly returns for stocks were 1.13% and 0.00%, respectively. Our results showed that the mean and median monthly returns for REITs were 1.06% and 0.95%, respectively.3 For the period from 1972 to 2020, the average monthly return for the CRSP value-weighted market index was 0.94%, which was slightly higher than 0.88% for the FTSE NAREIT ALL REIT index. However, the average monthly income return (i.e., dividend yield) for stocks was 0.24%, which was less than 0.63% for REITs.4 We grouped equity REITs into eight property types, including diversified, health care, hotel, industrial, office, residential, retail, and other equity REITs. Other equity REITs included casino, self-storage, and specialty REITs.5 There are two REITs with the same company identification number in CRSP. We treated these two REITs as one company and calculated their lifetime wealth creation as the sum of dollar wealth creations from these two REITs. Also, see note 19.6 Our sample began in January 1972 because return data for the FTSE NAREIT All Equity REIT index are available since then. Eight equity REITs were listed in CRSP prior to January 1972. The sample also excluded four equity REITs with an initial listing date in 2020.7 The CRSP database does not contain the offering price of an IPO and, hence, the return in the IPO month is not available. Consequently, our analysis did not capture the return from the IPO month of a REIT. Furthermore, some firms changed their status from a non-REIT to a REIT after operating for some time. For these REITs, the first monthly return used was the month when their REIT status was established. We used S&P Global Market Intelligence to identify such dates. We thank an anonymous referee for this suggestion.8 For REITs that were still trading as of December 2020, the last available monthly return was December 2020. For REITs that were merged, exchanged, liquidated, or delisted prior to December 2020, the last available nonmissing monthly return was used in the calculation. Since a stock might be merged, exchanged, liquidated, or delisted at any time in a month, it is likely the last available nonmissing monthly return was not for a full month.9 The data is available on Kenneth French’s website at https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html.10 The structural changes include allowing REITs to be internally managed and internally advised, removing the preferential tax treatment provided to limited partnerships, allowing the Umbrella Partnership REIT organization structure, and relaxing the restriction in institutional ownership.11 Results were not tabulated to save space.12 Appendix Figure A1 depicts dividend yields of equity REITs by property type over the period 1990–2020. The dividend yield data were retrieved from S&P Global Market Intelligence.13 Appendix Figure A2 shows price to NAV ratios of equity REITs by property type over the period 1990–2020. The NAV premium data were retrieved from S&P Global Market Intelligence.14 The poor performance in the 1981–1990 decade was likely due to the commercial real estate crisis in the late 1980s (Renaud, Citation1997). The geometric mean of annual returns for the CRSP value-weighted market index over the period 1987–1990 was 9.62%, while it was 0.19% for the FTSE NAREIT All Equity REIT index.15 Eleven REITs had a lifetime return exceeding 4,900%. These 11 returns are not displayed on Figure 3.16 Bessembinder (Citation2018) analyzed stocks over the period 1926–2016, which is much longer than our sample period 1972–2020. Thus, stocks in Bessembinder’s sample had a longer lifetime than equity REITs in our sample and, hence, generated a larger lifetime return. For example, out of the 25,967 individual stocks that Bessembinder examined, 574 stocks had a lifetime return over the mean return of 18,747.05%. The maximum lifetime return for stocks was 244.3 million %, which was substantially higher than 37,628% in our sample.17 For REITs that were still trading, the first digit of delisting codes was 1. For REITs that were delisted due to merger, exchange, or liquidation, the first digit of delisting codes was 2, 3, or 4. For REITs that were delisted by stock exchange, the first digit of delisting codes was 5.18 An SAS program to calculate the lifetime shareholder wealth is available on Hendrik Bessembinder’s website at https://wpcarey.asu.edu/sites/default/files/2021-10/wealthcreation_2019.sas_.txt.19 Kranzco Realty Trust, which has a unique PERMNO, merged with another REIT in June 2000. The two REITs were combined into a new REIT, Kramont Realty Trust. Kramont Realty Trust also has a unique PERMNO, but has the same PERMCO as Kranzco Realty Trust. The lifetime wealth creation for these two REITs was the sum of dollar wealth creations from the two PERMNOs.20 Only three REITs had a full life span of 588 months from January 1972 to December 2020. The average life span of the 370 REITs was 151 months.21 A complete list is available from the authors on request.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08965803.2023.2254587","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractThis study examined the performance of 371 equity real estate investment trusts (REITs) over the period 1972–2020. Unlike stocks, we found that the majority of the 371 REITs outperformed one-month T-bills, particularly over longer holding periods and in the modern REIT era. While most REITs outperformed the T-bills, only a minority of them outperformed the overall equity REIT market. REITs that outperformed the overall equity REIT market concentrated in the health care, industrial, residential, and other specialty REIT sectors. In terms of wealth creation, REITs in aggregate created a total net wealth of $0.89 trillion to their shareholders, but the wealth creation was highly concentrated in relatively few top-performing REITs. Specifically, the top five (20) REITs together accounted for almost 30% (60%) of the total net wealth creation. Overall, our results suggest that relative to the T-bills, REITs performed better than stocks.Keywords: Real estate investment trustsREIT return performanceshareholder wealth AcknowledgmentsThe authors thank three anonymous referees for helpful comments.Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1 The maximum lifetime return was 37,628% for REITs, while it was 244.3 million % for stocks.2 For example, Bessembinder (Citation2018) reported that the mean and median monthly returns for stocks were 1.13% and 0.00%, respectively. Our results showed that the mean and median monthly returns for REITs were 1.06% and 0.95%, respectively.3 For the period from 1972 to 2020, the average monthly return for the CRSP value-weighted market index was 0.94%, which was slightly higher than 0.88% for the FTSE NAREIT ALL REIT index. However, the average monthly income return (i.e., dividend yield) for stocks was 0.24%, which was less than 0.63% for REITs.4 We grouped equity REITs into eight property types, including diversified, health care, hotel, industrial, office, residential, retail, and other equity REITs. Other equity REITs included casino, self-storage, and specialty REITs.5 There are two REITs with the same company identification number in CRSP. We treated these two REITs as one company and calculated their lifetime wealth creation as the sum of dollar wealth creations from these two REITs. Also, see note 19.6 Our sample began in January 1972 because return data for the FTSE NAREIT All Equity REIT index are available since then. Eight equity REITs were listed in CRSP prior to January 1972. The sample also excluded four equity REITs with an initial listing date in 2020.7 The CRSP database does not contain the offering price of an IPO and, hence, the return in the IPO month is not available. Consequently, our analysis did not capture the return from the IPO month of a REIT. Furthermore, some firms changed their status from a non-REIT to a REIT after operating for some time. For these REITs, the first monthly return used was the month when their REIT status was established. We used S&P Global Market Intelligence to identify such dates. We thank an anonymous referee for this suggestion.8 For REITs that were still trading as of December 2020, the last available monthly return was December 2020. For REITs that were merged, exchanged, liquidated, or delisted prior to December 2020, the last available nonmissing monthly return was used in the calculation. Since a stock might be merged, exchanged, liquidated, or delisted at any time in a month, it is likely the last available nonmissing monthly return was not for a full month.9 The data is available on Kenneth French’s website at https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html.10 The structural changes include allowing REITs to be internally managed and internally advised, removing the preferential tax treatment provided to limited partnerships, allowing the Umbrella Partnership REIT organization structure, and relaxing the restriction in institutional ownership.11 Results were not tabulated to save space.12 Appendix Figure A1 depicts dividend yields of equity REITs by property type over the period 1990–2020. The dividend yield data were retrieved from S&P Global Market Intelligence.13 Appendix Figure A2 shows price to NAV ratios of equity REITs by property type over the period 1990–2020. The NAV premium data were retrieved from S&P Global Market Intelligence.14 The poor performance in the 1981–1990 decade was likely due to the commercial real estate crisis in the late 1980s (Renaud, Citation1997). The geometric mean of annual returns for the CRSP value-weighted market index over the period 1987–1990 was 9.62%, while it was 0.19% for the FTSE NAREIT All Equity REIT index.15 Eleven REITs had a lifetime return exceeding 4,900%. These 11 returns are not displayed on Figure 3.16 Bessembinder (Citation2018) analyzed stocks over the period 1926–2016, which is much longer than our sample period 1972–2020. Thus, stocks in Bessembinder’s sample had a longer lifetime than equity REITs in our sample and, hence, generated a larger lifetime return. For example, out of the 25,967 individual stocks that Bessembinder examined, 574 stocks had a lifetime return over the mean return of 18,747.05%. The maximum lifetime return for stocks was 244.3 million %, which was substantially higher than 37,628% in our sample.17 For REITs that were still trading, the first digit of delisting codes was 1. For REITs that were delisted due to merger, exchange, or liquidation, the first digit of delisting codes was 2, 3, or 4. For REITs that were delisted by stock exchange, the first digit of delisting codes was 5.18 An SAS program to calculate the lifetime shareholder wealth is available on Hendrik Bessembinder’s website at https://wpcarey.asu.edu/sites/default/files/2021-10/wealthcreation_2019.sas_.txt.19 Kranzco Realty Trust, which has a unique PERMNO, merged with another REIT in June 2000. The two REITs were combined into a new REIT, Kramont Realty Trust. Kramont Realty Trust also has a unique PERMNO, but has the same PERMCO as Kranzco Realty Trust. The lifetime wealth creation for these two REITs was the sum of dollar wealth creations from the two PERMNOs.20 Only three REITs had a full life span of 588 months from January 1972 to December 2020. The average life span of the 370 REITs was 151 months.21 A complete list is available from the authors on request.
房地产投资信托基金的长期回报及财富创造
摘要本研究考察了1972-2020年期间371家股权房地产投资信托基金(REITs)的表现。与股票不同的是,我们发现371支REIT中的大多数表现都好于一个月期国库券,特别是在较长的持有量和现代REIT时代。虽然大多数REIT的表现优于美国国债,但只有少数REIT的表现优于整体股票REIT市场。表现优于整体股票REIT市场的REIT集中在医疗保健、工业、住宅和其他专业REIT部门。在财富创造方面,房地产投资信托基金为其股东创造了总计0.89万亿美元的净财富,但财富创造高度集中在少数表现最好的房地产投资信托基金中。具体而言,前五大(20家)房地产投资信托基金合计占净财富创造总额的近30%(60%)。总体而言,我们的结果表明,相对于国库券,房地产投资信托基金表现优于股票。关键词:房地产投资信托;房地产投资信托基金;收益表现;股东财富;披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。注1房地产投资信托基金的最高终身回报率为37,628%,而股票的最高终身回报率为2.443亿%例如,Bessembinder (Citation2018)报告称,股票的月平均回报率和中位数分别为1.13%和0.00%。结果表明,REITs的月平均收益率为1.06%,月中位数收益率为0.95%从1972年到2020年,CRSP价值加权市场指数的月平均收益率为0.94%,略高于富时NAREIT ALL REIT指数的0.88%。然而,股票的平均月收益回报率(即股息收益率)为0.24%,而房地产投资信托基金的平均月收益回报率低于0.63%我们将股权REITs分为八种房地产类型,包括多元化、医疗保健、酒店、工业、办公、住宅、零售和其他股权REITs。其他股权REITs包括赌场,自助仓储和专业REITsCRSP中有两个REITs具有相同的公司识别号。我们将这两个REITs视为一家公司,并将其一生的财富创造计算为这两个REITs创造的美元财富总和。此外,我们的样本开始于1972年1月,因为富时NAREIT所有股票REIT指数的回报数据从那时起就可用了。在1972年1月之前,有8个股权REITs在CRSP中上市。该样本还排除了4个首次上市日期为2020.7的股权REITs。CRSP数据库不包含IPO的发行价格,因此无法获得IPO月份的回报。因此,我们的分析没有捕捉到房地产投资信托基金IPO月份的回报。此外,一些公司在经营一段时间后,从非REIT转变为REIT。对于这些房地产投资信托基金,使用的第一个月收益是其房地产投资信托基金成立的月份。我们使用标准普尔全球市场情报来确定这些日期。我们感谢一位匿名推荐人的建议对于截至2020年12月仍在交易的REITs,最后一次可用的月度回报是2020年12月。对于在2020年12月之前合并、交换、清算或退市的REITs,在计算中使用最后可用的非遗漏月度回报。由于股票可能在一个月内的任何时候被合并、交换、清算或退市,所以很可能最后一次没有丢失的月度回报不是整整一个月这些数据可在Kenneth French的网站https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html.10上获得。结构性变化包括允许REIT由内部管理和内部建议,取消提供给有限合伙企业的税收优惠待遇,允许伞型合伙REIT的组织结构,以及放宽机构所有权的限制为节省篇幅,未将结果制成表格图A1描述了1990年至2020年期间按物业类型划分的股票型房地产投资信托基金的股息收益率。股息收益率数据来自标准普尔全球市场情报。图A2显示了1990-2020年期间按房地产类型划分的股票型房地产投资信托基金的价格与资产净值比率。资产净值溢价数据来自标准普尔全球市场情报。14 1981-1990年十年的糟糕表现可能是由于20世纪80年代末的商业房地产危机(雷诺,Citation1997)。1987-1990年期间,CRSP价值加权市场指数的年回报率几何平均值为9.62%,而富时NAREIT All Equity REIT指数的年回报率为0.19%11个房地产投资信托基金的终身回报率超过4,900%。Bessembinder (Citation2018)分析了1926-2016年期间的股票,这比我们的样本期1972-2020要长得多。 因此,Bessembinder样本中的股票寿命比我们样本中的股票REITs更长,因此产生了更大的终身回报。例如,在Bessembinder研究的25,967只个股中,574只股票的终身回报率超过了平均回报率18,747.05%。股票的最大终身回报率为2.443亿%,大大高于我们样本的37628%对于仍在交易的REITs,退市代码的第一位数字为1。因合并、交易、清算等原因退市的REITs,退市代码的第一位数字为2、3、4。对于被证券交易所摘牌的REIT,摘牌代码的第一个数字是5.18。SAS计算股东终身财富的程序可以在Hendrik Bessembinder的网站上找到,网址是https://wpcarey.asu.edu/sites/default/files/2021-10/wealthcreation_2019.sas_.txt.19 Kranzco Realty Trust,该公司拥有独特的PERMNO,于2000年6月与另一家REIT合并。这两个房地产投资信托被合并成一个新的房地产投资信托,克莱蒙特房地产信托。Kramont Realty Trust也有一个独特的PERMNO,但与Kranzco Realty Trust具有相同的PERMCO。这两个REITs的终身财富创造是两个permno创造的美元财富的总和从1972年1月到2020年12月,只有三个REITs的完整寿命为588个月。370只reit的平均寿命为151个月完整的列表可根据要求从作者处获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信