{"title":"Analisis Pergerakan Wacana Kasus Agni","authors":"Aprilia Kartika Putri, Anggi Triandana, Siti Fitriah, Ulil Amri, Yoga Mestika Putra","doi":"10.22437/kalistra.v2i2.24690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The news about Agni (not her real name) in 2018, a student at a major university in Indonesia who was sexually assaulted by a colleague, raised pros and cons in public. These pros and cons were caused not only by the case of sexual harassment, but also by the remarks from the university and non-governmental organizations that assisted the victim. The author is interested in examining the pros and cons of this case. This paper explores the discourse movement from the pros and cons of this case seen from various statements from the university and Agni's supporters in online mass media headlines. The discourse movement is analyzed using Sawirman's BREAK theory. Abstrak Pemberitaan mengenai Agni (bukan nama sebenarnya) pada 2018 lalu, seorang mahasiswi salah satu universitas besar di Indonesia, yang mengalami tindakan pelecehan seksual oleh rekannya, menimbulkan pro dan kontra di tengah masyarakat. Pro kontra ini selain disebabkan oleh kasus pelecehan seksual tersebut, juga disebabkan oleh pernyataan pihak universitas dan pihak lembaga swadaya yang membantu korban. Penulis pun tertarik untuk menelaah pro kontra kasus ini. Tulisan ini mengupas pergerakan wacana dari pro dan kontra kasus ini dilihat dari berbagai pernyataan pihak universitas dan pendukung Agni yang termuat di judul-judul media massa daring. Pergerakan wacana itu dianalisis menggunakan teori BREAK dari Sawirman.","PeriodicalId":499642,"journal":{"name":"Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22437/kalistra.v2i2.24690","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The news about Agni (not her real name) in 2018, a student at a major university in Indonesia who was sexually assaulted by a colleague, raised pros and cons in public. These pros and cons were caused not only by the case of sexual harassment, but also by the remarks from the university and non-governmental organizations that assisted the victim. The author is interested in examining the pros and cons of this case. This paper explores the discourse movement from the pros and cons of this case seen from various statements from the university and Agni's supporters in online mass media headlines. The discourse movement is analyzed using Sawirman's BREAK theory. Abstrak Pemberitaan mengenai Agni (bukan nama sebenarnya) pada 2018 lalu, seorang mahasiswi salah satu universitas besar di Indonesia, yang mengalami tindakan pelecehan seksual oleh rekannya, menimbulkan pro dan kontra di tengah masyarakat. Pro kontra ini selain disebabkan oleh kasus pelecehan seksual tersebut, juga disebabkan oleh pernyataan pihak universitas dan pihak lembaga swadaya yang membantu korban. Penulis pun tertarik untuk menelaah pro kontra kasus ini. Tulisan ini mengupas pergerakan wacana dari pro dan kontra kasus ini dilihat dari berbagai pernyataan pihak universitas dan pendukung Agni yang termuat di judul-judul media massa daring. Pergerakan wacana itu dianalisis menggunakan teori BREAK dari Sawirman.