A Review of Measurement Tools Developed and Adapted Based on the Rasch Model

Emine Burcu TUNÇ
{"title":"A Review of Measurement Tools Developed and Adapted Based on the Rasch Model","authors":"Emine Burcu TUNÇ","doi":"10.53048/johass.1369336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is often observed that the Rasch model is frequently used in determining the psychometric properties of measurement tools because the Rasch model has many advantages in the development and adaptation of measurement instruments. The aim of this study is to evaluate the theses included in the National Thesis Center, which examine the psychometric properties of measurement tools within the framework of the Rasch model, within the scope of the requirements of the Rasch model. In line with this purpose, the model of the research is a document analysis research within the scope of qualitative research. All theses containing the word Rasch in the thesis name and index were examined, and 24 theses in which the measurement tool was developed and adapted within the scope of the Rasch model were found. In order to examine these measurement tools, a coding list was created and the data was analyzed by applying categorical analysis which is one of the content analysis methods. According to the results obtained, it was revealed that in the majority of theses, information was given about unidimensionality, but in half of the theses, no information was given about the local independence assumption. There are studies that do not specify which model is used for polytomous items, and it was observed that model comparison was not performed. It was determined that item model fit was generally tested with different approaches in the theses, and item parameters were generally included. It is among the results that the Person separation index related to reliability was not reported in all studies, and sufficient information was not provided in some studies, even though Differential Item Functioning analyses were performed. In light of these results, it is seen that there is no common systematic approach in the development or adaptation of measurement tools within the framework of the Rasch model in the studies. Therefore, it is recommended that more detailed studies explaining this systematic approach should be conducted.","PeriodicalId":470135,"journal":{"name":"İnsan ve sosyal bilimler dergisi","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"İnsan ve sosyal bilimler dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53048/johass.1369336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is often observed that the Rasch model is frequently used in determining the psychometric properties of measurement tools because the Rasch model has many advantages in the development and adaptation of measurement instruments. The aim of this study is to evaluate the theses included in the National Thesis Center, which examine the psychometric properties of measurement tools within the framework of the Rasch model, within the scope of the requirements of the Rasch model. In line with this purpose, the model of the research is a document analysis research within the scope of qualitative research. All theses containing the word Rasch in the thesis name and index were examined, and 24 theses in which the measurement tool was developed and adapted within the scope of the Rasch model were found. In order to examine these measurement tools, a coding list was created and the data was analyzed by applying categorical analysis which is one of the content analysis methods. According to the results obtained, it was revealed that in the majority of theses, information was given about unidimensionality, but in half of the theses, no information was given about the local independence assumption. There are studies that do not specify which model is used for polytomous items, and it was observed that model comparison was not performed. It was determined that item model fit was generally tested with different approaches in the theses, and item parameters were generally included. It is among the results that the Person separation index related to reliability was not reported in all studies, and sufficient information was not provided in some studies, even though Differential Item Functioning analyses were performed. In light of these results, it is seen that there is no common systematic approach in the development or adaptation of measurement tools within the framework of the Rasch model in the studies. Therefore, it is recommended that more detailed studies explaining this systematic approach should be conducted.
基于Rasch模型的测量工具发展与应用综述
由于Rasch模型在测量工具的开发和适应方面具有许多优势,因此经常使用Rasch模型来确定测量工具的心理测量特性。本研究的目的是评估纳入国家论文中心的论文,这些论文在Rasch模型的要求范围内,在Rasch模型的框架内检查测量工具的心理测量特性。本着这一目的,本研究的模式是定性研究范围内的文献分析研究。对所有在论文名称和索引中包含Rasch一词的论文进行检查,发现在Rasch模型范围内开发和调整测量工具的论文有24篇。为了检验这些测量工具,我们创建了一个编码表,并应用内容分析方法之一的分类分析对数据进行分析。结果表明,大多数论文给出了关于单维性的信息,但有一半的论文没有给出关于局部独立假设的信息。有一些研究没有指定对多同构项目使用哪种模型,并且观察到没有进行模型比较。结果表明,本文一般采用不同的方法进行项目模型拟合检验,项目参数一般包含在内。结果之一是,尽管进行了差异项目功能分析,但并没有在所有研究中报告与可靠性相关的人分离指数,并且在一些研究中没有提供足够的信息。根据这些结果,可以看出,在研究中,在Rasch模型的框架内,没有共同的系统方法来开发或适应测量工具。因此,建议进行更详细的研究来解释这种系统方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信