Conflict between Indigenous Peoples and Forest Concession Rights Holders in Customary Forest Management in Gowa Regency, South Sulawesi

Baso Madiong, None Sobirin, Abdul Karim
{"title":"Conflict between Indigenous Peoples and Forest Concession Rights Holders in Customary Forest Management in Gowa Regency, South Sulawesi","authors":"Baso Madiong, None Sobirin, Abdul Karim","doi":"10.32996/ijlps.2023.5.5.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The determination of indigenous peoples' rights to customary forests has been regulated and recognized in the State Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945 and Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Provisions of Agrarian Principles (UUPA) and the Constitutional Court Decision of the Republic of Indonesia Number 35 of 2012, but until now there are still many government activities and companies holding Forest Concession Rights Permits that claim customary forests as state forests. This has resulted in conflicts in customary forest management. This study aims to analyze the causes of conflicts over customary forest land conversion in the Gowa Regency and analyze the legal consequences of conflicts in the Gowa Regency customary forest areas. This research uses qualitative research with a descriptive type. By conducting in-depth interviews with the Gowa District Forestry Service, Customary Leaders and company leaders holding Forest Concession Rights Permits. The results showed that there was a conflict in customary forest management in Gowa Regency, caused by each party, both local governments, Forest Concession Rights (HPH) holders and indigenous peoples claiming that they did not clearly understand the meaning contained in the legislation and also the Gowa Regency Regional Regulation which recognized the rights of indigenous peoples only limited to recognition but in fact, deprived indigenous peoples of their rights in the form of forests, as a result of the legal occupation of customary forest areas in Gowa Regency by local governments and HPH Permit Holders, flooding and erosion due to massive deforestation and residents around the forest are declining health level (Poor). For this reason, the local government is expected to immediately make optimal efforts to empower indigenous peoples in the form of forests so that they can improve their welfare and not give permission to companies to manage customary forests in the Gowa Regency so that conflicts are not prolonged.","PeriodicalId":475085,"journal":{"name":"International journal of law and politics studies","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of law and politics studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32996/ijlps.2023.5.5.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The determination of indigenous peoples' rights to customary forests has been regulated and recognized in the State Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945 and Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Provisions of Agrarian Principles (UUPA) and the Constitutional Court Decision of the Republic of Indonesia Number 35 of 2012, but until now there are still many government activities and companies holding Forest Concession Rights Permits that claim customary forests as state forests. This has resulted in conflicts in customary forest management. This study aims to analyze the causes of conflicts over customary forest land conversion in the Gowa Regency and analyze the legal consequences of conflicts in the Gowa Regency customary forest areas. This research uses qualitative research with a descriptive type. By conducting in-depth interviews with the Gowa District Forestry Service, Customary Leaders and company leaders holding Forest Concession Rights Permits. The results showed that there was a conflict in customary forest management in Gowa Regency, caused by each party, both local governments, Forest Concession Rights (HPH) holders and indigenous peoples claiming that they did not clearly understand the meaning contained in the legislation and also the Gowa Regency Regional Regulation which recognized the rights of indigenous peoples only limited to recognition but in fact, deprived indigenous peoples of their rights in the form of forests, as a result of the legal occupation of customary forest areas in Gowa Regency by local governments and HPH Permit Holders, flooding and erosion due to massive deforestation and residents around the forest are declining health level (Poor). For this reason, the local government is expected to immediately make optimal efforts to empower indigenous peoples in the form of forests so that they can improve their welfare and not give permission to companies to manage customary forests in the Gowa Regency so that conflicts are not prolonged.
南苏拉威西果瓦县传统森林管理中土著人民与森林特许权所有者之间的冲突
1945年《印度尼西亚共和国国家宪法》、1960年《关于农业原则基本条款的第5号法律》和2012年《印度尼西亚共和国宪法法院第35号判决》对土著人民对习惯森林权利的确定进行了规定和承认,但到目前为止,仍有许多持有森林特许权许可证的政府活动和公司声称习惯森林是国家森林。这导致了传统森林管理方面的冲突。本研究旨在分析果瓦县习惯林地转换冲突的原因,并分析果瓦县习惯林区冲突的法律后果。本研究采用定性研究与描述性研究相结合的方法。通过对果瓦地区林业局、习惯领导人和持有森林特许经营权许可证的公司领导人进行深入采访。结果表明,在果瓦县的习惯森林管理中存在冲突,这是由各方造成的,地方政府、森林特许权持有者和土著人民都声称他们不清楚了解立法和果瓦县区域条例所载的含义,该条例承认土著人民的权利仅限于承认,但实际上剥夺了土著人民以森林形式的权利。由于地方政府和卫生保健许可证持有人合法占领果瓦县的习惯森林地区,由于大规模砍伐森林造成洪水和侵蚀,森林周围居民的健康水平正在下降(差)。因此,期望当地政府立即作出最佳努力,以森林的形式赋予土著人民权力,使他们能够改善自己的福利,并不允许公司管理果瓦县的习惯森林,以免冲突延长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信