Diversified boards and the achievement of environmental, social, and governance goals

IF 3.6 2区 哲学 Q2 BUSINESS
Asma Alawadi, Nada Kakabadse, Michael Morley, Nadeem Khan
{"title":"Diversified boards and the achievement of environmental, social, and governance goals","authors":"Asma Alawadi,&nbsp;Nada Kakabadse,&nbsp;Michael Morley,&nbsp;Nadeem Khan","doi":"10.1111/beer.12606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We explore the impact of board resources arising from diverse board members on the achievement of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) goals. Employing resource dependence theory as our frame and drawing on qualitative data from 41 interviews with board directors of publicly traded and privately held companies in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), we identify three key mechanisms underpinning the achievement of ESG goals, namely, the leveraging of particular connections, the deployment of different resources, and the harnessing of a range of diversity types. We find that the use of social resources is often related to environmental concerns and occasionally social goals, but rarely governance issues. We also find that financial motivations often drive environmental issues, while many of the social resources that added value occurred in the public sector. Importantly, the combining of both skill and social resources, rather than relying on each alone, was seen to increase the likelihood of achieving ESG goals. Our findings also point to the importance of board diversity in accomplishing the board's ESG goals, most especially functional diversity. We propose that such functional diversity, along with resources in the form of social resources and skills, needs to feature more prominently in order to improve ESG performance and outcomes. We highlight the implications of our work, especially regarding the establishment of board diversity policies beyond gender alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":29886,"journal":{"name":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","volume":"33 3","pages":"331-348"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Ethics the Environment & Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/beer.12606","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We explore the impact of board resources arising from diverse board members on the achievement of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) goals. Employing resource dependence theory as our frame and drawing on qualitative data from 41 interviews with board directors of publicly traded and privately held companies in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), we identify three key mechanisms underpinning the achievement of ESG goals, namely, the leveraging of particular connections, the deployment of different resources, and the harnessing of a range of diversity types. We find that the use of social resources is often related to environmental concerns and occasionally social goals, but rarely governance issues. We also find that financial motivations often drive environmental issues, while many of the social resources that added value occurred in the public sector. Importantly, the combining of both skill and social resources, rather than relying on each alone, was seen to increase the likelihood of achieving ESG goals. Our findings also point to the importance of board diversity in accomplishing the board's ESG goals, most especially functional diversity. We propose that such functional diversity, along with resources in the form of social resources and skills, needs to feature more prominently in order to improve ESG performance and outcomes. We highlight the implications of our work, especially regarding the establishment of board diversity policies beyond gender alone.

多元化董事会与实现环境、社会和治理目标
我们探讨了多样化董事会成员带来的董事会资源对实现环境、社会和治理(ESG)目标的影响。我们以资源依赖理论为框架,利用对阿拉伯联合酋长国(UAE)上市公司和私人控股公司董事会董事进行的 41 次访谈的定性数据,确定了实现环境、社会和治理(ESG)目标的三个关键机制,即利用特定关系、部署不同资源和利用各种类型的多样性。我们发现,社会资源的使用通常与环境问题有关,有时也与社会目标有关,但很少与治理问题有关。我们还发现,财务动机往往是环境问题的驱动力,而许多社会资源的增值则发生在公共部门。重要的是,将技能资源和社会资源结合起来,而不是单独依靠每一种资源,可以提高实现环境、社会和治理目标的可能性。我们的研究结果还表明,董事会多元化对实现董事会的环境、社会和公司治理目标非常重要,尤其是职能多元化。我们建议,为了提高环境、社会和公司治理方面的绩效和成果,这种职能多样性以及社会资源和技能方面的资源需要更加突出。我们强调了我们工作的意义,尤其是在制定董事会多元化政策方面,而不仅仅是性别方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信