The Identification of Relevant Factors for Breastfeeding Techniques in Postpartum Women Before Discharge in China: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sen Li, Dan Zhu, Guoli Liu
{"title":"The Identification of Relevant Factors for Breastfeeding Techniques in Postpartum Women Before Discharge in China: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Sen Li, Dan Zhu, Guoli Liu","doi":"10.31083/j.ceog5010209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To assess breastfeeding techniques and identify the relevant factors among postpartum women in hospital. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from March, 2022 to April, 2022 at a general hospital in China. A total of 331 postpartum women were investigated using a questionnaire survey that included the LATCH (latch, audible swallowing, type of nipple, comfort, and hold) scoring system, a general information and behavior questionnaire, a breastfeeding knowledge questionnaire, and the Chinese version of the maternal breastfeeding evaluation scale. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify independent factors for in-hospital breastfeeding techniques. Results: The average score for breastfeeding techniques before discharge was 7.88. In the bivariate analysis, the factors found to be significantly associated with scores for breastfeeding technique were parity, number of births, participation in online antenatal classes during pregnancy, mastery of the hand expression technique, nipple cracking and satisfaction with breastfeeding (each p < 0.05). The result displayed parity, participation in online antenatal classes, and satisfaction with breastfeeding were included in a multiple linear regression model (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Although breastfeeding techniques prior to discharge are improving, more improvements can be made. Clinical medical staff should therefore pay particular attention to primiparas, postpartum women who did not participate in online antenatal courses during pregnancy, and postpartum women with a low satisfaction for breastfeeding. Measures that promote breastfeeding techniques, publicize online antenatal training courses, provide breastfeeding guidance shortly after delivery, and provide timely evaluation and targeted guidance should help to improve breastfeeding techniques before discharge and increase the exclusive breastfeeding rate.","PeriodicalId":10312,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental obstetrics & gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog5010209","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To assess breastfeeding techniques and identify the relevant factors among postpartum women in hospital. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from March, 2022 to April, 2022 at a general hospital in China. A total of 331 postpartum women were investigated using a questionnaire survey that included the LATCH (latch, audible swallowing, type of nipple, comfort, and hold) scoring system, a general information and behavior questionnaire, a breastfeeding knowledge questionnaire, and the Chinese version of the maternal breastfeeding evaluation scale. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify independent factors for in-hospital breastfeeding techniques. Results: The average score for breastfeeding techniques before discharge was 7.88. In the bivariate analysis, the factors found to be significantly associated with scores for breastfeeding technique were parity, number of births, participation in online antenatal classes during pregnancy, mastery of the hand expression technique, nipple cracking and satisfaction with breastfeeding (each p < 0.05). The result displayed parity, participation in online antenatal classes, and satisfaction with breastfeeding were included in a multiple linear regression model (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Although breastfeeding techniques prior to discharge are improving, more improvements can be made. Clinical medical staff should therefore pay particular attention to primiparas, postpartum women who did not participate in online antenatal courses during pregnancy, and postpartum women with a low satisfaction for breastfeeding. Measures that promote breastfeeding techniques, publicize online antenatal training courses, provide breastfeeding guidance shortly after delivery, and provide timely evaluation and targeted guidance should help to improve breastfeeding techniques before discharge and increase the exclusive breastfeeding rate.
中国产后妇女出院前母乳喂养技术相关因素的识别:一项横断面研究
背景:探讨住院产后妇女母乳喂养方式及相关因素。方法:于2022年3月至2022年4月在中国某综合医院进行横断面研究。采用LATCH (LATCH、可听吞咽、乳头类型、舒适度、抱紧)评分系统、一般信息与行为问卷、母乳喂养知识问卷、中文版母乳喂养评价量表对331名产后妇女进行调查。采用多元回归分析确定院内母乳喂养技术的独立因素。结果:出院前母乳喂养技术评分平均为7.88分。在双变量分析中,发现与母乳喂养技术得分显著相关的因素是胎次、分娩次数、孕期在线产前课程的参与、手部表达技术的掌握、乳头开裂和母乳喂养满意度(每个p <0.05)。结果显示胎次、在线产前课程参与和母乳喂养满意度被纳入多元线性回归模型(p <0.05)。结论:虽然出院前母乳喂养技术正在改进,但还可以进一步改进。因此,临床医务人员应特别关注初产妇、孕期未参加在线产前课程的产后妇女以及对母乳喂养满意度较低的产后妇女。推广母乳喂养技术、宣传在线产前培训课程、在分娩后提供母乳喂养指导、及时评估和有针对性的指导等措施,应有助于改善出院前的母乳喂养技术,提高纯母乳喂养率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: CEOG is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. CEOG covers all aspects of Obstetrics and Gynecology, including obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine. All submissions of cutting-edge advances of medical research in the area of women''s health worldwide are encouraged.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信