Evaluation of Skin Cancer Risk Factors and Sun Protection Methods among MedicalFaculty Students

Altaş Z.M., Hıdıroğlu S, Dölek B, Sarı İ.B., Polat İ.Y., Gül N.A, Save D.
{"title":"Evaluation of Skin Cancer Risk Factors and Sun Protection Methods among MedicalFaculty Students","authors":"Altaş Z.M., Hıdıroğlu S, Dölek B, Sarı İ.B., Polat İ.Y., Gül N.A, Save D.","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.7427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: It was aimed to evaluate the sun protectionmethods and skin cancer risk factors among medicalstudents.Materials and Methods: The universe of thedescriptive research is 1,2,3,4,5 and 6th gradestudents (1482 students) of the medical faculty of astate university. It was aimed to reach the wholeuniverse, no sample size was calculated. Thequestionnaire was delivered via WhatsApp inNovember-December 2021. Sociodemographicinformation, skin cancer risk factors, sun protectionmethods were questioned (38 questions). Thebehaviors of sun protection methods were evaluatedby scoring the questions (6 questions). Higher scoreindicates higher protection behavior. Median,minimum, maximum values, numbers (n) andpercentages (%) were used for descriptive data. TheMann Whitney U test was used to compare thequantitative variables that did not fit the normaldistribution. The significance level was consideredas p<0.05.Results: Of the participants 58.3% (n=354) werewomen, 25.2% (n=153) were sixth grade. Of thestudents 34.9% (n=212) use sunscreen, 32.3%(n=196) use a hat, 39.9% (n=242) use sunglassesonly in summer. Of the students 48.9% (n=297) hadFitzpatrick skin type 3, 20.3% (n=484) reportedhaving more than 50 nevi, 37.2% (n=226) reportedhaving nevi larger than 2 mm. Female students,students educating in upper classes and living incoastal areas, having Type 1-2-3 skin types andfreckles had higher sun protection behavior scores(p<0.05).Conclusions: The rate of medical faculty studentspaying attention to sun protection methods is notsufficient. Awareness on this issue should beincreased","PeriodicalId":138155,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Health Sciences","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.7427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: It was aimed to evaluate the sun protectionmethods and skin cancer risk factors among medicalstudents.Materials and Methods: The universe of thedescriptive research is 1,2,3,4,5 and 6th gradestudents (1482 students) of the medical faculty of astate university. It was aimed to reach the wholeuniverse, no sample size was calculated. Thequestionnaire was delivered via WhatsApp inNovember-December 2021. Sociodemographicinformation, skin cancer risk factors, sun protectionmethods were questioned (38 questions). Thebehaviors of sun protection methods were evaluatedby scoring the questions (6 questions). Higher scoreindicates higher protection behavior. Median,minimum, maximum values, numbers (n) andpercentages (%) were used for descriptive data. TheMann Whitney U test was used to compare thequantitative variables that did not fit the normaldistribution. The significance level was consideredas p<0.05.Results: Of the participants 58.3% (n=354) werewomen, 25.2% (n=153) were sixth grade. Of thestudents 34.9% (n=212) use sunscreen, 32.3%(n=196) use a hat, 39.9% (n=242) use sunglassesonly in summer. Of the students 48.9% (n=297) hadFitzpatrick skin type 3, 20.3% (n=484) reportedhaving more than 50 nevi, 37.2% (n=226) reportedhaving nevi larger than 2 mm. Female students,students educating in upper classes and living incoastal areas, having Type 1-2-3 skin types andfreckles had higher sun protection behavior scores(p<0.05).Conclusions: The rate of medical faculty studentspaying attention to sun protection methods is notsufficient. Awareness on this issue should beincreased
医学院学生皮肤癌危险因素及防晒方法之评估
目的:了解医学生的防晒方式及皮肤癌危险因素。材料与方法:描述性研究的对象为州立大学医学院一、二、三、四、五、六年级学生(1482名学生)。它的目标是覆盖整个宇宙,没有计算样本大小。该问卷于2021年11月至12月通过WhatsApp发送。社会人口学信息、皮肤癌危险因素、防晒方法被询问(38个问题)。通过对问题(6个问题)的评分来评价防晒方法的行为。得分越高,表示保护行为越好。描述性数据采用中位数、最小值、最大值、数字(n)和百分比(%)。mann Whitney U检验用于比较不符合正态分布的定量变量。显著性水平为p<0.05。结果:参与者中58.3% (n=354)为女性,25.2% (n=153)为六年级学生。其中34.9% (n=212)的学生使用防晒霜,32.3%(n=196)的学生使用帽子,39.9% (n=242)的学生只在夏天使用太阳镜。其中48.9% (n=297)为fitzpatrick皮肤3型,20.3% (n=484)报告痣超过50个,37.2% (n=226)报告痣大于2mm。女性学生、上层社会教育学生和沿海地区学生、1-2-3型皮肤类型和雀斑学生的防晒行为得分较高(p < 0.05)。结论:医学生对防晒方法的重视程度不高。应该提高对这个问题的认识
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信